Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post


While writing this post, I was trying to imagine what it would be like to have sex with an SEE, and I concluded that it would probably be like having sex with a very attractive person who isn't really there.
I much prefer sex with ESIs who are very attractive people who are really there.
“LOL” doesn’t begin to describe my reaction to this comment. It’s kind of mean… however I believe you mean it in the sense of the true soul connection being missing on some level, as opposed to the other person being hollow. And in that sense, I think you might be onto something in identifying the difference in the relationships of LIE/SEE vs. LIE/ESI. In the SEE’s defence, I think that they may, in return, describe SEE/LIE sex as the LIE being too intense (vs. their more dreamy counterpart ILI). So in that sense, SEE/ILI sex would consist of neither one “being there” (LOL) because the SEE is preoccupied with their own bodily experience, and the ILI is lost in their own thoughts—yet being introverted does not also have to deal with the overwhelming need to voice them and thus they’re a better fit (no pun). In contrast, with LIE/ESI sex, both would be focused on/lost in “the connection” (ESI more with the physical, LIE more with the psychological). I’m just guessing… no experience dating a dual.