I'll add this to my signature. I'm curious about how I'm perceived from the outside.
I think I'm ENFp, but if you have a different opinion I would like to read about why do you think so.
Mikemex type
I'll add this to my signature. I'm curious about how I'm perceived from the outside.
I think I'm ENFp, but if you have a different opinion I would like to read about why do you think so.
[]
| NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
ENFp.
I voted "other alpha" but ENTp works, too.
i voted enfp
you write a lot like an enfp who believes they know it all
*looks completely and utterly innocent*
and nothing like the other entps on this forum.
....well, except for gilligan who has his good and bad days
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
I don't think you're lacking for Fi so I'll say ENFp.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
I can't see an ounce of Ti.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I haven't really paid enough attention to his posts to say I've seen or not seen any particular functions, but I get an Alpha feel... hence my vote. I am open to other suggestions though.
feel free to delete this post
Sorry for that post...just ignore it.
(Actually, I'm going to delete it.)
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
ENFp.
I think he has a preference for Fi.
LOL @ ann's post.
INTp
sx/sp
Vote goes for ENFp (Ne subtype).
me
Yeah.Originally Posted by FDG
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
IEE.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Well, I'm not really that arrogant. It's just that I'm used to state my views quite confidently (maybe because my father is INTj and my supervisor, and instead of getting angry, I've developed resistance over time).
Over all, I'm a free thinker, so I don't care if the rest of the world don't agree with me. To me, ideas stand by their own weight, not by how much people supports them.
[
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
If they are illogical, they are illogical forever. This argument, too, is of course illogical.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Re: Mikemex type
ENFp seems fine to me, VI and your style and content in interaction. While friendly and interested, your seem to have a distance within.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
VI? Where are the pics?
Delta IEE confirm
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
So people just view you as arrogant but you know better?
Are you unaffected by quoting someone for authority on a matter?
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
You come across as bitchy, (though not mean-spirited), interpersonally exploitative (You are not a person who i would feel safe talking about my feelings/weaknesses with no offense) even if you find justifications for being so, moralistic and independent. Like you are just trying to find the right thing for you and you're only using other people's opinions to help yourself.
I think we are from conflicting quadras definitely, as I don't naturally feel comfortable pming you and 'just being myself' but I do value your sense of values. When you do that you come across objectively as arrogant to other people but when somebody does the reverse (like me, I have a horrible time trying to find what my values truly are) - they come off as 'victim playing' so I don't think we can win with ANYBODY - objectively, that's the point. You just have to find somebody that likes you for you like we all do.
Yes, I don't believe in quantum physics for example. And I have no problem claiming that Bohr and other figures are wrong.
Basic claims of quantum physics are largely unscientific. We don't have instruments to be sure of what's happening at small levels and rather than assuming that there is no reason to believe that they are be doing anything special, scientists went the esoteric way and derived a lot of things from logic. If you take statistics literally, you're at risk about thinking that some women have a full child and some just have one third of a child, just because statistics says that fertility is 2.3.
Astonished of my claims, my father asked me if I imply that all the millions spent in the hadron collider are a waste. And all the work of hundreds if not thousands of scientists involved in the issue. I just replied that big numbers don't give a cause any legitimacy: hundreds of millions lost their lives in religious conflicts and it doesn't make them any more relevant.
People don't notice it because it's all too human to surround ourselves with people that think like us and scientific communities are not exception to that rule.
Obviously, you don't know me at all.
[
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
You asked how you appear to others, not who you were. You won't let anybody get a chance to do that because you don't act vulnerable on the forum with others in any post I have ever seen from you. The things you talk about always come across as things outside of yourself.
Which makes you LOOK like an arrogant bitch, not that you ARE one.
You still come across as bitchy and interpersonally exploitative. But maybe that's just because you are lousy with people and insensitive.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
That's just narcissistic nonsense. Ideas without grounded empathy are just insane.Over all, I'm a free thinker, so I don't care if the rest of the world don't agree with me. To me, ideas stand by their own weight, not by how much people supports them.
An idea doesn't have a weight. It's just an idea. I just thought strongly that my nephew was in another room but really he was in a room I wasn't even t hinking he was in , in reality.
I know before I got rude and short with you (like years ago I said I wanted to punch your avatar in the face lmao) but I don't really get you at all. I would apologize but why when you come across like you aren't willing to relate.
It's good that the opinions of others don't have such effect on you because you this thread might make you think that you are really fucking stupid and annoying. But, hey, we don't know the awesome real you. You just appear retarded.
I can't see an ounce of Ti.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
Maybe you're addicted to this:
And just get frustrated because I am not.
[
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
Well, looks like you met the welcoming committee, mikemex.
Avatar is not a good source, but I'd think about beta F based on it.
But, but, don't you need a video or something?
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Nonverbal data exists on photos, so I may assume types by photos too. Video is much better as has more nonverbal data, - gives more probability of correct type.
Type me please. I have a YouTube video
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That's not a picture of him though. Mikemex is a guy.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I did it in past. And have said your type is doubtful to be INFJ.
lol. one of good reasons to say your sex in the profile. especially for languages like English
^
I do think IEE fits Mikemex.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I doubt based on how rude he talks. What says about physics. And betish looking woman on the avatar.
and what would you type me, oh god of socionics?
*hint
"annoying" is not a type...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Make a video and we'll see.
People can find opposing quadra members attractive-looking, no? that's not what socionics is about... Idk about the other two things. Mikemex hasn't been particularly rude to me personally...but i'm not sure that not being rude is a qualifier for IEE-ness. That is after all an Fe-thing, imo.
I'm not sure what he has said about physics to you, but i've had some conversations about science with mikemex where things he said seemed a bit nonsensical to me personally. Although idk what that translates to socionically.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
