How strange that his eye color has changed from pale blue to dark brown.
Discussion about this in short videos: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...address-video/
How strange that his eye color has changed from pale blue to dark brown.
Discussion about this in short videos: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...address-video/
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
Why? Why must you plague with these irrelevant topics of conversation with dubious sources that no one wants to or is going to paruse through?
His eyes are dilated.
He's surprisingly cogent for his age (can't say the same for Trump who appears to show signs of dementia). Of course, the same can be said for Bernie.
On an unrelated note, it's nice not being constantly reminded he is president because he fades into the background by not constantly showboating.
I have community radio on whenever I am driving and sometimes when NPR comes on and they mention President Biden, I am like "Oh, yeah, he's the president now." It's not like I forgot he's president but it's in the back of my mind most of the time.
When he was hiding in his basement during the election season in 2020 they were slowly grafting his skin onto a lizardman
Wow, It is educational to me, to see that that is how the mainstream media sells it.
But you can't help but know the media has an over-the-top slant left (Do you realize honest news coverage should be as neutral as possible??). And you've seen the Media's heavily selective censorship. And their just plain lies. So remember the news you see is highly selective and highly censored. We can't even read comment on news stories anymore. All that is censored now. So consider you aren't seeing everything. I will show you two plain proofs of Biden's incoherence, because, thank God, we aren't communist, and we aren't going to be sent to a concentration camp for viewing non-mainstream news (while we can and before it get's censored).
First, check out the link above in the OP. There is a [1 min., 56 sec.] video in the link. You can fast forward if you want, but the one that comes up immediately after that, starts right in on a current 20 second video clip of Biden speaking incoherently. The rest of the conversation is more info on this topic, including one that worked with him before, who says the current Joe is "at 50%", and is being handled completely differently than before.
Second is the following video, and it is HILARIOUS. At first I was offended by the circus music and they way the guys are laughing, because laughing at people seems tome like mocking and I don't like to mock, but it just only 6 minutes so I kept watching and soon I was laughing, too. And I had to watch it over again because it was unbelievable. The guys' expressions and laughter - and the suppressed laughter of Biden's interviewers, and that of the standers-by, just pulls you into the hilarity of it. Which feels good. Because it's much better to laugh than to cry.
So here it is. It is set at start at 30 seconds in, and this Biden montage ends at 6 min., 20 seconds:
One of the guys says, right after the six minute video:
"If you went and tried to make a five minute montage like that -- I mean, you couldn't find another politician (as crazy as some of them are, and [they]say crazy things - maybe Pelosi, maybe a little bit) - but you couldn't find five minutes of that. There is no other person you could do that with."
Yes, isn't that the truth. And we certainly know it is absolutely impossible to make such a montage of Trump, because if such a thing were possible you know it would have been done, and you would have already seen it - repeatedly and everywhere. The Media would see to that. But it looks like they didn't make sure you saw this Joe one.
The guys in this video go on to mention so many other crazy-Joe things that didn't make this video. Then there are those entire video montages of "Joe the Creep", petting and stroking women and little girls, and sniffing their hair - in front of multiple cameras aimed at him that he actually knows are there. The guy has more than one screw loose. And that is besides the creepiness strangeness of changing his face and chin and eye color!
Last edited by Eliza Thomason; 03-29-2021 at 06:40 AM.
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
........... The stupid is overwhelming.
There was no imprisoning for "geting info from forbidden mass medias" in USSR. Seems there was no any punishment for this. People could to get by radios capitalistic propaganda and never hear about problems for this.
USA's presidents. One satanistic TV clown has changed the other one. Nothing changed. If it's another human - nothing changes too. Majority's votings in the regime where interests of a minority is thought as higher can't be not falsificated indirectly or directly. Not a 1st case of doubtful voting calculations was in USA.
If you don't like communism which is based on humanistic collectivism then you reject Christianity too, as you prefer satanistic individualism of capitalism and its people hating approach. Where interests of small minority with big money is set above interests of the majority and where this majority is suppresed by different ways to keep the power above them.
Last edited by Sol; 03-29-2021 at 11:06 AM.
Wow, this is gobsmacking, Sol. You should know the horrors of communism! The devil loves communism. It always means tyranny, death of mass numbers of the population*, as well as violent persecution of religion.
Communism is polar opposite of Christianity. Communism will not tolerate Christianity. It is a totalitarian regime. Capitalism DOES tolerate and support Christianity. Obviously. (Capitalism has some problems and is not perfect because there is NO GOVERNMENT that will ever create a paradise (because PEOPLE will run the government and people aren't perfect).
God eliminated the whole idea that communism might be a good thing, and is instead the enemy of Christianity, when He sent the Blessed Mother with that message, accompanied by the greatest miracle since the parting of the Red Sea, witnessed by probably more people, because huge crowds gathered (including journalists), because unlike the Red Sea miracle, this one was foretold.
The core message of Fatima was a warning that unless Russia were consecrated to her Immaculate Heart, Russia would spread her errors throughout the world. And there was another World War, which she told us could be prevented. She said that if Russia were not consecrated as she asked, there would be soon another world war as well as many other wars. And Russia still has not been consecrated. (Some will say it was, by JPII, but that was clearly not done as asked - which is, it must be done by the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world). In the 20th century, more people died for the faith than in the previous Christian centuries combined.
But Our Lady told us that "in the end" her Immaculate Heart will triumph. The world will revive once again by Heaven's help. But meanwhile, we in America (and around the world) groan and struggle with the errors spread by Russia - Marxism, Socialism and (shudder) Communism. These errors were a horrible scourge on Russia, and they are a scourge to the whole world. Communism is horrible.
This is what those angling for Socialism in America want. Socialism, leading to communism. "You will own nothing and you will be happy". Yeah, sure.
That said, I will have to get back to that because having a lot going on this week, plus it is Holy Week, so my time is full, and it will be sometime after before I can get back to this.
___________
*Loss of population due to communist tyranny, as well as anything that threatens the life and health of population, like covid (or perhaps deaths and ill health caused by experimental vaccines), or deaths from cancer (that somehow can never be cured, but will certainly always need more piles and piles more money spent on finding one!) are tragic to us regular folk, but if you are a population-control elite, then these are actually all good things. Positives for our planet! Yeh!
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
Yes this sure is strange. This looks more like doppelgangers than twins. (You know how you can look at identical twins and find the little differences to tell them apart). They look like different color "seasons" palettes - one warm, one cool. I did a google image search for more images for more comparisons, but strange, though he was in politics for 40 years, almost all the older pics of Joe have been removed! Almost nonexistent. Google sure is weird with the stuff they remove.
editing to add: the more I look the more I see. When he got his nose job they shortened the proportional distance from nose tip to mouth. Huh.
Last edited by Eliza Thomason; 03-29-2021 at 05:52 PM.
Wasn't Jesus supposed to have lived on a commune? Where people shared everything without using money?
I wonder if you could call it commune-ism.
LOL, Adam. I never heard of a commune-tale for Jesus!
Nope, Jesus did not have anything to do with a commune life. He lived in family life only - truly the perfect family life - His whole life, and then the three years of ministry beginning at age 30. All those years before, unlike other young Jewish men who left home to start families, He lived at home with his mother and father (earthly, foster father) and did not leave home until He was 30 and left for his ministry and death (which was His ministry, too). It is thought that Joseph died shortly before that. His three years ministry was not living somewhere with His disciples but traveling (walking) all over Israel with them, with only shot stays as guests with people who showed them hospitality (The Jews had a tradition that it was proper and good, though not required, to show hospitality to travelers), always on the move, often sleeping without shelter along the long distance travel routes.
Are you being serious that you have heard that? No Sunday school classes growing for you?
Did you ever read the Bible? Or just the New Testament? Just wondering.
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
Eliza, I've read parts of the Bible, and I've read some analysis it, but I don't read it the way I read mathematics texts, so I probably have a lot of the details wrong.
Nevertheless, I grew up in a nuclear family and a communism. All the resources were pooled, and people could withdraw from that pool based on need. When I needed shoes, my father didn't ask me how I was going to pay for them.
@Sol was merely pointing out that capitalism, where personal debts are denominated in money, not in good will, has some serious drawbacks.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage...35&version=ESV
32 Now the full number of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one said that any of the things that belonged to him was his own, but they had everything in common. 33 And with great power the apostles were giving their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. 34 There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold 35 and laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.
Russia has the experience of of socialism and of capitalism. As the one who lives here I know the situation some better than those who live in USA. Also I may remember a little of late USSR.
I notice that at capitalism the life of most people has become much worse than was in USSR. People get lesser income, worse morality, worse education level.
You may check UN's levels of human development index of USSR and of Russian Federation to compare, and places of them among other countries. May look what happens with population numbers to understand how worse life conditions has become since 1991. To look what happens with a place in science, what we produce and export to compare with USSR. Not only life of most people, but also Russia as the state has degraded significantly too.
Horrors of capitalism is what I see near me everyday. Those were more clear until 1917 worldwide, when communists pushed other countries to make the life of most people better.
Russians better than anyone else understands that communism and socialism is better for people by own experience.
This fits to the theory where individualism has antihumanistic nature, which creates inequality where a minority exploitates the majority. Communism is opposite to this.
To blame Communism means to blame the idea of love to people, the life in serving to the humanity, among main ideas of Christianity. While to accept capitalism means to accept Satanism.
Hithler is the example of ideology where a minority is above the majority - a "special nation", "super people", etc. It's where capitalism goes - to new classes society, where the majority is treated as slaves and biorobots. While communism leaded to develop anyone as unique personality to higher, but not to use most people as slaves which serve to a "special" minority.
Humanity is doubtful to stay alive and develop without dominating collectivistic ideology, without altruistic love to others. It's what the essence of communism.
This I do want to respond to, and I will, but I have so many thoughts to wrangle that I can't do it this week. I have been thinking for a time now after being shocked how in these times people would even for a minute think of communism as a benign, let alone a not-horrible option. To this end I have researched and put in much thought and now have important (to me) insights that I have not yet put into words -- but if I try to pull it all together on the spot right now it will be long and rambling, as a result of my hard-to-wrangle-Ti.
This is the sort of thing I need to put a ton of thought into in order to communicate on it, and then write my thoughts out for myself, and then edit and rearrange that overflowing pile of words, because is it an IEE handicap with Ti that we can be boringly wordy and quite meandering explaining what we really do have thought out well in our own heads for our own understanding. And this is the very sort of topic that is unwieldy for me to communicate, unlike decorating, art, psychology, socionics, relationships, parenting, education theory, or a number of other things for me. And it is an important topic for me, so I will be responding to both of these posts of yours. This week is Holy Week and in my tradition there is a whole lot happening in this, our most important week of the year. And I just learned I will hear about a position I am "still a serious candidate" for, that I have been pursing for weeks now and if I get it there will be much training to start with, on I don'' know what schedule, or how soon. But it is important to me to get back to this and I will!
Meanwhile, read this below, and feel very sorry for me when you read what I have to go through to make my thoughts on such matters coherent!
A Spotlight on IEE's Introverted Logic (Ti)
IEEs tend to have a difficult time describing a concept or system in a manner in which the essential facts are all that is needed to understand or describe it. The IEE's focus in describing a concept or system is in how they themselves came to understand and see what they are describing. If an IEE is asked to describe or explain something, their natural tendency is to describe the pieces of the concept, system or idea that are related to the subject as a foundation before explaining the actual concept itself. The IEE will often describe details or aspects of a system that are unnecessary to the understanding of the system's properties, but the IEE views these details as essential functions of a sequential system (as opposed to describing the concept or system and only the concept or system as an independent entity). In other words, even if a detail is deemed outside of the IEE as extraneous, the IEE that is describing it will see it as a vital and significant part of a chain in order to paint the full, "proper" picture of the system the IEE wants to describe. An IEE will tend to start off explanations with a tremendous amount of detail, energy and patience and will move towards a more general explanation as they tire out (if they tire out). If something in the IEE's chain is broken or questioned, the description (in the IEE's mind) halts or falls apart.
When an IEE understands a logical concept or system, they are much better at describing anecdotal experiences with the concept or system that help to illustrate the concept or system. They would prefer to do this rather than describing the concept or system as described in the previous paragraph -- describe the essential facts of a concept or system.
Last edited by Eliza Thomason; 03-30-2021 at 02:15 AM.
I sure hope you did not see any criticism of you in what I wrote, because I had not such intentions. The Bible is not required reading in these times and if you don't have an active Christian faith, which you haven't declared, I wouldn't expect you to. I just wanted to see where you were coming from.
The commune analogy surprised me quite a bit, because I never met a single person that grew up in a commune, so it came out of left field for me. I have questions if you wouldn't mind explaining! You said above, "nuclear family and communism" - is that a typo? Did you mean commune?
Hmm. My father didn't ask us kids how we were going to pay for shoes... he just provided them! One pair once a year at the start of school for school, a pair of dress/church shoes replaced only when outgrown, and sneakers for play as needed. Summer sandals, nothing fancy. I had three brothers but we had a very limited pool of relatives, as my Dad was an only child and my Mom had one sis with one son, and we were living in a different state from them (and where they came from). My Mom was stay-at-home until temp work and substitute teaching when we got to middle school, and my Dad was a salesman who frequently traveled for work; sometimes we had no car because of that, and those times we walked everywhere or went for long bike rides together to a park for a picnic. We had just enough clothes for what we needed, no excess. We did manage a 1 (occasionally 2) week annual vacation to a lake cabin in the mountains though, because my parents were frugal. Times were tight at times but my parents kept us from that a lot. I guess most families ask family members when times get tight, and I don't know if they ever did that, but I do know my grandfather mortgaged our house for then, at a very low rate. Most people can't do that for their kids, but my dad was an only. I can't imagine a connection where you had a poll of money not related to your family.
When I was working to put my ex through college, on my very minimal wage as a library clerk at the university, we had a semester when we did not think we could afford to pay tuition and fees, and the deadline loomed. We prayed, and a check came in the mail for the amount we needed. We had no idea where this came from, and we found out much later after he graduated and we were moving out of that state, that a classmate/study partner of my ex's had a girlfriend from a wealthy family and she heard about our concern, and her father paid for that semester! That was amazing. People do come through for you.
As to what Sol is saying, please read what I just wrote him, and have pity on me.
Last edited by Eliza Thomason; 03-30-2021 at 01:59 AM.
@Eliza Thomason
You may visit Cuba to see "horrors" of communism/socialism. Take into account that people there get long and serious economical harm from USA & co.
In ex-USSR territory Belorussia has kept significant USSR economy basis and style. Visit it instead of TV propaganda.
With lesser formal political approach it can be said that societies differ in the degree of individualism (capitalism) and collectivism (communism) balance. For the simplicity, it's linked much with an equality of peoples incomes. Look at situations in countries with low and high equality of incomes.
USSR should tended to have 10% RP close to 3. Same as other friendly socialistic countries which it controlled.
What you see with COVID worldwide lie is the intention to reduce socialistic reforms done after 1917 in many countries, to return more of inequality. Besides incomes, it is about information and education. Technology development may allow to create higher levels of slavery and inequality than before.
Those who blame communism (collectivism) - support antihumanistic individualistic regimes and their coming on new level. Those who blame communism created hithlerism and two World Wars. Those who blame communism support hell on earth and satanism.
This globalist pig Biden took office, gas prices are now way up, way way way up. Used to cost me 44 dollars to fill my tank up with 93. Now, 60 bucks. Look up the prices before Globalism. 15 bucks to fill up a tank of gas. Before globalism, 100,000 dollars a year was upper class. Now that's shit.
Globalism destroyed US's standard of living.
Trump had the right idea about declaring Trade War on China. America first is the only way to go.
Keep going in the other countries first direction, there's not goin' to be a middle class.
Clinton and Obama were two globalist pigs of the highest order -- they made America take the bend over and touch your ankles first policy so China and other countries can rape and pillage the economy.
Last edited by Kill4Me; 04-11-2021 at 02:58 PM.
You are all South Afrincans now. Plan accordingly.
This is the comment you are looking for
If are going to criticise an ideology for being totalitarian, don't follow Christianity.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
it's possession, that's how he stopped the march prophesy about trump the holy righteous magically returning to office. it's a godless time. the end is nigh.
"You ain't black!"
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
reasons for eye color change constitute (sensitive) private data. be a class act and let lizards be.
"Joe Biden then" was just a quart low.
The obsequious reporters make this so much better. Truly my president lmao.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
BASED
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".