Block 1. Ethics - accepting, inert, strong
For Dreisers, information about values, morality, attitudes, qualities of people, their reactions and behavior is valuable and necessary for the perception of the world in itself. He does not use this information as a tool, since it is of self-sufficient value for him.
ESI tends to be very deeply immersed in thinking about the values of people and their behavior. In this area, he wants not only to receive information, but also to process it, creating new, his own attitudes - new ideas about morality, ethics, etiquette, which may come into conflict with external social attitudes.
This type assimilates a large amount of both his own and someone else's experience in the field of attitudes towards certain things, and this allows him to develop universal moral norms, taking into account many ethical factors.
BE - mental, boot, template, value
Dreisers tend to generalize information and build it into abstract categories. He often uses in his speech non-specific assessments (“good”, “decent”, “wrong”, “mean”) and general descriptions of the qualities of people with a clear evaluative subtext (“human”, “rotten”, “friend”, “enemy” ).
ESI constantly monitors the state of his relationships with others, and seeks to keep them under control. Moreover, he can establish not only his own, but also other people's relations, settle conflicts. In this area, stability is important to him.
This type builds its picture of the world on clear principles, it is typical for it to have a kind of “ethical code”, even if its ideas about morality differ from the generally accepted ones.
He is interested in studying the values of people, posing moral dilemmas to them in order to understand their system of priorities in life. He likes to understand what is important for people and not important, what they think is good and bad, and give his own assessment of this.
CHE - vital, unloading, situational, non-value
A dreiser rarely talks about concrete actions and actions of people, or, for example, retells other people's words and dialogues, since in his area of attention are not the behavioral manifestations of people directly, but conclusions drawn from them - about the qualities of people, about how to evaluate their actions, for example, is this or that act a betrayal.
This type is not characterized by adherence to principles in matters of etiquette, politeness and behavioral norms. The motives of the action are more important to him than the action itself (that is, whether the action was committed maliciously, knowingly or by mistake, whether the person regrets what he did).
ESI, as a rule, approaches behavior quite flexibly, adjusting it to a specific situation and a specific person. At the same time, he may suddenly show his own behavioral attitudes, which are very different from the generally accepted ones. But they do not appear on an ongoing basis, but rather chaotically.
Information about the actions, behavior of people, the rules of decency and etiquette is not interesting to this type in itself, if it does not reveal issues of relationships and human qualities. Interacting with such information causes internal resistance.
Originally Posted by thehotelambush
Reply With Quote
I don't care about rules either tbh and I don't relate to the english translated descriptions. Considering that LSI is supposed to be MBTI ISTP I do not think the translation from Russian to English is a good one, due to how we understand what "rules" mean.
with this said, you still could be ESI. In my case I was considering that ISTP in MBTI (before coming to the forums), it made much more sense to me after my run-in with several INTPs who in hindsight were clear LIIs. ESI would be MBTI ISFP.
