@Aramas INFj EII with a good amount of analysis and inclusion
@Aramas INFj EII with a good amount of analysis and inclusion
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Aramas ESI - Fi (maybe)
Thegreenfarie IEE- Fi
Freelancepolice EII- Fi
Adding the fi egos
Join a video chat @kingslayer and see if you still think I'm IEE I know some people have had doubts on video, but others not clearly : ) We can type you too
No way I see FP as EII
Sounds fun, I'm down. When and where are these calls?
You just really remind me of a co-worker I had once. She was delta or beta nf, I think we ended up settling on IEE for her (she ended up getting into socionics)
I should have put a disclaimer that I'm not the best typist. I jump between my own type fairly often. My thoughts are just a general impression off of your posts, Te dual seeking seems like it would benefit you more than Fe IMO.
oh no, he was right lol, who is Jon o.O
I'm still trying to accept the fact that supposedly @Beautiful sky and @Aramas could be the same type. It's more likely that they're semi-duals or something close to that.
That we do.. Especially in the eyes.
Structure wise I been told similar to young Marlon Brando. I didn't see it at first, but now I totally do and it's like we're related as well lol. I see Brando's typings all over the place here, same with Momoa, so makes sense mine are as well haha.
I've seen both typed SLE, SEE and Si base . I've even seen IEI for Brando from our mutual acquaintance
@Beautiful sky / Maritsa
for EIE against EII
Introverted types are generally shy to discuss sex and own sex preferences publicly. Especially N ones, which have this region weak and so vulnerable for a criticism. Also for Fi types is lesser expected to praise publicly abnormal sex variants which may be perceived as aversive for many people. And Si valued types have lesser interest to unnatural sex with elements of doubtful pleasantness.
Seems, her initial variant of the message had only a single string cited above, without the part in the brackets and other text. It was just emotional demonstrative shout. Then, after my message in that theme about links with Se valued types, she've expanded the message.
@Eliza Thomason
Last edited by Sol; 07-30-2020 at 05:29 PM.
@Megatrop
To the point, Maritsa is your possible dual. Her videos, in case she kept them, are useful to check your impressions from her nonverbal - the degree she's comfortable for you. Besides her messages on the forum. The grammar, at least, should be not so bad.
Don't be weird, @Sol. Maritsa is EII.
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I think Maritsa is EIE. (:
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I like Martisa a person; she seems pretty nice. ((: But Maritsa has an approach to Socionics that I personally find odd and rather eccentric, and which deviates substantially from what I (and probably many others) would consider Socionics. She believes, for instance, that the shape of someone's neck is a reliable indicator of their sociotype.
yes that's eccentric. Do you have any more information that could help type her? I know EIIs can also have very weird ideas. Now watching her video again I guess one could consider EIE? But if she is mistyped that is pretty interesting, because she has devoted herself so much to her selftyping. I know I would be shocked if I found out I was mistyped after 10+ years with socionics. @maritsa, do you have any more videos for typing?
edit: @Beautiful sky (sorry forgot)
Last edited by Tallmo; 07-31-2020 at 08:09 AM.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)