Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 67891011 LastLast
Results 361 to 400 of 417

Thread: German Typings Thread / Deutsche Soziotypen

  1. #361
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,702
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
    Das kann ich nicht beantworten.
    Ja, das verstehe ich, das kann ich von dir nicht verlangen.

    Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
    Es ist halt schwer, da er hauptsächlich natürlich in einer wissenschaftlichen Umgebung agiert und man kaum private Eindrücke von ihm bekommt, also natürlich auch schwer schwache Funktionen beobachten kann.
    Stimmt. Vom seinem Privatleben ist so gut wie nichts bekannt. Er spricht in der Öffentlichkeit nur darüber wenn er kokret darauf angeprochen wird.
    Er ist zwar prominent, aber nicht mal die Boulevardmedien interessieren sich für sein Privatleben.

    Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
    Er nutzt auch keine sozialen Netzwerke (was für mich wiederum auf eine Introvertiertheit hindeutet).
    Ich habe eher den Eindruck dass er zuviel arbeitet und einfach keine Zeit dafür hat in sozialen Netzwerken tätig zu sein.

    Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
    Ich denke die einzige Gewissheit für uns beide ist Alpha NT. Ich müsste ihn wohl in Person beobachten, um wirklich sicher zu sein.
    Da bin ich derselben Ansicht.

  2. #362
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,702
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Joseph von Fraunhofer — gamma NT , würde ich sagen, basierend auf dem was von ihm überliefert wurde.

  3. #363
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hans-Jürgen Faul - LSI



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xefg4gBG_8

    ist wahrscheinlich als video für die intuitiven typen hier eher uninteressant, aber ich bin immer auf der suche nach S-Typen, da sie meiner einschätzung nach den großteil der gesellschaft ausmachen.
    Last edited by Still Alive; 12-30-2019 at 09:14 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  4. #364
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  5. #365
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @WinnieW: ich würde dir mittlerweile doch bei Harald Lesch zustimmen. Ich habe in den letzten Tagen ein paar seiner Videos gesehen.

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5E...Dv2wHuA/videos

    Ich finde für einen introvertierten Typen beschäftigt er sich mit zu vielen Themen und ist zu involviert in der Kommunikation mit seinen Gästen. Er hat oft direkte Reaktionen zu dem Geschehen, mit dem ich mich als LII nicht identifizieren kann.

    In diesem Video fängt er bei der Bekanntgabe der Gewinner des Nobelpreises sogar an zu weinen.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjdV1T6v6DU+

    Ich denke ILE macht doch deutlich mehr Sinn. Ich könnte mir bei ihm einen normalisierenden Subtyp mit akzentuiertem Ti vorstellen, wodurch er den Eindruck eines LII erweckt.

    Helmut Schmidt - ILI



    "Keine Begeisterung sollte größer sein als die nüchterne Leidenschaft zur praktischen Vernunft."

    https://youtu.be/deIy4P7_SEI

    denke in diesem Videoausschnitt kann man Ni+Te sehr gut erkennen.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  6. #366
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Saliha Özcan - SEI



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUNQ...ature=youtu.be

    ihr Mann ist auch ein SEI.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  7. #367
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    No. IEI.
    hmm, I watched a couple more interviews and you might be right. I rejected the idea that he was an intuitive because of his occasional aggressive behaviour (something for which an IEI is definitely not known for).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRiFI-n0iQ8

    but I'm starting to think that he is a dominant subtype, and displays this behaviour because of his accentuated Se. in interviews he is quite calm and peaceful.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  8. #368
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  9. #369
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,702
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Um mal ein Beispiel zu bringen weshalb ich denke dass Emmy Cho SEI ist, hier mal ein Beispiel eines Lebensmitteltesters der meiner Einschätzung nach ESE ist.

    Junkfoodguru




  10. #370
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sascha Huber ist meiner Einschätzung nach ein SLE



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCNutgZXaP0
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  11. #371
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Markus Lanz - LSE

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  12. #372

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    TIM
    IEI-Fe-DCh so/sx
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    *not sure If i posted this already somewhere

    Emilio Sakraya - LSI-Se


  13. #373
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Elyas M'Barek - SLE



    Tim Raue - SLE



    Sophia Thomalla - SLE

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  14. #374
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  15. #375
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anne Will - LSE



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1Bj0TEfk8M

    Sandra Maischberger - LSE



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgwnh03Hg8E

    Michael Wendler - ESI

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  16. #376
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,702
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
    Anne Will - LSE


    Anne Will – wirklich LSE?

  17. #377
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinnieW View Post


    Anne Will – wirklich LSE?
    ich hab ein video unter das foto verlinkt, weil ich deine meinung zu ihrem typ wissen wollte. das video mit ina hatte ich auch gesehen. ich denke beide sind extrovertiert und sehr gespächig, wobei ina mit Fe als basisfunktion noch deutlich extrovertierter rüberkommt. Anne Will hat in mehreren videos erwähnt, sie wollte in ihrer jugend etwas handwerkliches lernen, am liebsten wäre sie schreiner geworden (ich glaube sie erwähnt es auch im video mit Ina). sie hat ziemlich klare vorstellungen von ihrem leben und ihren zielen, was mich eher zu einem rationalen typen führt. logik scheint mir recht deutlich ausgeprägt zu sein. LSE scheint mir der typ zu sein der einfach am meisten sinn macht. welchen typ würdest du vorschlagen?

    hier ist auch noch ein kurzes video mit ihr und klaas, wo er über emotionale aspekte ihrer tätigkeit redet und sie fast gar keinen fokus darauf hat. (man sieht hier recht gut Fi als basisfunktion bei klaas)

    https://youtu.be/V8R805wtEQA
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  18. #378
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,702
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
    welchen typ würdest du vorschlagen?
    Ich bin mir da nicht ganz schlüssig. Was mir allerdings aufgefallen ist dass sie Te hauptsächlich im beruflichen Umfeld verwendet u. sie als Privatperson deutlich mehr Fe einsetzt.
    Nur gibt es keinen Typen der sowohl Te als auch Fe wertschätzt. Meiner Vermutung nach ist die Form Te zu nutzen bei Journalisten Resultat der Ausbildung.
    Ich verhalte ich im beruflichen Umfeld auch anders im Vergleich zum privaten Umfeld. Te nutze ich rein um bestimmte Aufgaben zu erledigen, ansonsten eher spärlich.
    Ansonsten habe ich da schon bestimmte Vorstellungen von meinem Leben, aber diese kollidieren doch öfters mit der Realität.

    Aber es ging ja um Anne Will und deren Typ, nicht meinen. Ich kann nicht erkennen dass Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer und Anne Will denselben Typ haben sollen.
    Anne Will ist viel offener und geschickter was den Ausdruck ihrer Emotionen betrifft und sie reagiert auch geschickter auf emotionale Ausdrücke anderer Leute... aber das zeigt sie fast nur in privaten Situationen, selten im beruflichen Situationen.

    Was sind eigentlich die Anzeichen dass Ni die Verletzbarkeitsfunktion von Anne Will sein soll?



    ...und hier noch ein Interview mit ihre welches sicherlich bereits 20 Jahre her ist.

    Last edited by WinnieW; 02-19-2020 at 07:19 PM.

  19. #379
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinnieW View Post
    Ich bin mir da nicht ganz schlüssig. Was mir allerdings aufgefallen ist dass sie Te hauptsächlich im beruflichen Umfeld verwendet u. sie als Privatperson deutlich mehr Fe einsetzt.
    Nur gibt es keinen Typen der sowohl Te als auch Fe wertschätzt. Meiner Vermutung nach ist die Form Te zu nutzen bei Journalisten Resultat der Ausbildung.
    Ich verhalte ich im beruflichen Umfeld auch anders im Vergleich zum privaten Umfeld. Te nutze ich rein um bestimmte Aufgaben zu erledigen, ansonsten eher spärlich.
    Ansonsten habe ich da schon bestimmte Vorstellungen von meinem Leben, aber diese kollidieren doch öfters mit der Realität.

    Aber es ging ja um Anne Will und deren Typ, nicht meinen. Ich kann nicht erkennen dass Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer und Anne Will denselben Typ haben sollen.
    Anne Will ist viel offener und geschickter was den Ausdruck ihrer Emotionen betrifft und sie reagiert auch geschickter auf emotionale Ausdrücke anderer Leute... aber das zeigt sie fast nur in privaten Situationen, selten im beruflichen Situationen.

    Was sind eigentlich die Anzeichen dass Ni die Verletzbarkeitsfunktion von Anne Will sein soll?

    ...und hier noch ein Interview mit ihre welches sicherlich bereits 20 Jahre her ist.
    hmm ich werde mir deine videos mal anschauen. sie scheint mir eigentlich in allen videos die ich gesehen habe den eindruck einer Logikerin zu machen. alles ist sehr rational. schau dir mal dieses video mit klaas speziell ab 3:53 an, wo er ethische aspekte ihrer arbeit (ziemlich deutlich Fi) erwähnt und sie überhaupt keinen fokus darauf hat.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8R805wtEQA

    es gibt für mich im moment zumindest keinen anderen typ, der bei ihr in frage kommen würde. Menschen können den gleichen Typ haben, und trotzdem sehr unterschiedlich sein. Im Falle von AKK halte ich Anne Will persönlich für deutlich intelligenter.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chae View Post
    ILE SO/SP - Peter Fox
    hmm, schau dir mal dieses kurze Videointerview von ihm an:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3KhD_TqVNE

    was auf jeden fall an musik gut ist, es bringt leute zusammen. man kann auch gefühle gut teilen bei musik, bei einer party oder beim tanzen.

    Ich denke er ist ein IEI
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  20. #380
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Stefan Raab - ISFJ - Jack London

    Last edited by khcs; 05-06-2021 at 08:45 AM.

  21. #381

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    TIM
    IEI-Fe-DCh so/sx
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LII-Ne


  22. #382
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,702
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Alexander Bloch - Beta ST

  23. #383
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Liberal Propagandist Oliver Welke - ESFP - Napoleon




  24. #384
    back for the time being Chae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    ExFx 3 sx
    Posts
    9,183
    Mentioned
    720 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    bares für rares is such an sp/so show it's incredible.

    antiques and rarities sold (sp) with the help of a jury/expert team (so).

    now an extremely mainstream phenomenon, has a sort of conservative appeal. classic synflow

    Attached Images Attached Images

  25. #385
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,759
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default


    SLI / ISTP

  26. #386
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,702
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dead account View Post
    Rezo ist meiner Einschätzung nach ein EIE
    I confirm that.

    Rezo... real name publicy unknown... is EIE with well developed Te-Role

    Strong Fe focus in most of his videos, Ni valued, Si unvaled, a few videos with strong Te focus

    Last edited by WinnieW; 06-24-2020 at 01:10 PM.

  27. #387
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    yraglac
    Posts
    7,893
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


  28. #388
    back for the time being Chae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    ExFx 3 sx
    Posts
    9,183
    Mentioned
    720 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    falco — very enneagram 3w4 and either alpha or beta extrotim, SO/SX


  29. #389
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE-C (ISTP)
    Posts
    2,299
    Mentioned
    248 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think Falco was beta, EIE.

  30. #390
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Horst Seehofer - ESFJ

    Last edited by khcs; 05-06-2021 at 08:44 AM.

  31. #391
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thomas Rabe - ENTJ Stierlitz




    Last edited by khcs; 05-06-2021 at 08:44 AM.

  32. #392

    Default

    Any suggestions for Joachim Sauer (spouse of Angela Merkel)?

    Sabine Pommikay ist eine Fotze aus Epe, sie hat geschlechtlich mit Andreas Lienesch verkehrt!

    (+49) 0178 2117679

  33. #393

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    TIM
    IEI-Fe-DCh so/sx
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Madeline Juno - ESI so/sx 4w5


  34. #394

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    TIM
    IEI-Fe-DCh so/sx
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maja Schöne - IEI


  35. #395

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    TIM
    IEI-Fe-DCh so/sx
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Christian Ehring - LSE


  36. #396
    if it isn't Mr. Nice Guy Ave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    6,146
    Mentioned
    247 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Stefan Ackermann of Das Ich - IEI

    Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs

  37. #397
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    yraglac
    Posts
    7,893
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Alive

    Joachim Löw,

    Mario Götze,

    Manuel Neuer.

  38. #398
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerxe View Post
    @Alive

    Joachim Löw,

    Mario Götze,

    Manuel Neuer.
    ILI, ESI, not sure about Neuer, seems rather introverted. might be ESI too
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  39. #399
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ursula von der Leyen - INTP Huxley

    This is the comment you are looking for



  40. #400

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    TIM
    IEI-Fe-DCh so/sx
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oli.P - EIE-N ?


Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 67891011 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •