I'm not married. She wouldn't be into it.Originally Posted by miss BabyDoll
I'm not married. She wouldn't be into it.
by offensive I meant how you attack people with your rude remarks. I'm not the only one in here complaining, proof is most of that shit got deleted after pointing it out.
you can count on me to call out people who behave like pricks, when they have no reason to, yes. for example, those who denounce online bigots for hate towards racial/ethinic/religious minorities, and are themselves hateful bigots towards specific groups. as you've repeatedly shown.
look, I got what you meant in that thread, there's no reason you keep requoting that example as a sign of how smart you are. understanding your logic doesn't make it true...
I'm not into hateful hypocrites, even if they were married ; )I'm not married. She wouldn't be into it.
Oh fuck off you pussies sometimes people sleep with married people and ya its unfortunate, but its not like someone was fucking murdered for christ sakes. Don’t make a habit out of it and move on.
You two could provide useful feedback for the hate fucking thread. Do it for socionics. Do it for science.
<3
Pretty much this. Personally, I don't think there's ever any situation where sleeping with someone who is married is acceptable. Of course, the act in and of itself is detestable. And I would personally never do such a thing. But a person is never detestable in my book. I can't judge a specific person for their deeds, partly because I don't know enough about this situation in particular - if it even happened - nor is it any of my business. Also, we all make mistakes. Everyone of us - even those on their moral high horse.
Didn't Jesus teach forgiveness and to love your enemy? Just a thought, seeing as how a lot of the hate seems to come from "Christians", who if present in the New Testament would probably be the Pharisees more than anything else.
Tagging @ooo for reference.
Girl snapped
thanks atly, I agree. I don't mind passing as the reckless bitch here, I don't really care what some internet idiots think. but it's funny 'cause they accuse me based on made up things. the guy I dated was in a somewhat open marriage, his wife knew he was in other relationships at times, and would let him free. she doesn't know the specific people he's dated, but she knows of them.
what amazed me is how some people were ready to use a confession of mine as an excuse to attack me. but it's just a gang thing, unrelated to anything I do, had I said I was gonna join GreenPeace, you'd see them burn a forrest down, just to offend me.2 people don't like me and the whole gang goes "gnč gnč let's burn this witch alive"
so passč~
To be clear, using her infidelity against her is primarily a means to an end, with that endpoint being > don’t critique my Fi when your own Fi is flawed and fucked, and especially when my “sins” (talking crudely and recklessly to certain individuals on an internet forum) pale in comparison to hers (infidelity). Simple. Moreover, it’s retarded and unreasonable to hold someone with 1D Fi to the same morally consistent standard as someone with 3D or 4D Fi. I’m not addressing her sitting atop some high horse. I readily concede that much of my own personal ethics are flaky af and easily picked up and just as easily discarded, which is ultimately why I’m Fi seeking. But evidently hers exist along active fault lines, as well, and so, for me, it comes off as hypocritical for her to critique my "vulgarity," because if I'm “vulgar,” then arguably so is she.
And speaking for myself, I don’t believe in cheating (already have trust issues and to me that’s a massive betrayal) and anyone who cheats on me would certainly not cheat the accompanying death. Half joking. But anything done outside of my business is none of my business because people in relationships have the right to negotiate their own boundaries, independent of whatever I think or believe. But then don’t come pointing out the “straw” in my eye when you have a “rafter” in yours.
I like you, for what that's worth.
Morals are bullshit anyway.
edgepost af
mfckrz - SLI final type
Ur profile pic is edgy
why are all the SLEs on this site retarded
I like you too @Adam Strange
hey you take that back Mr Dostoyevsky
Mr Dostoevsky would have liked the SLEs on this site : )
Nah bro, I do not huff gasoline
Thanks, I like it too
we're all happy now : )
edgy
nr9 - ESI final
it's not ACTUALLY Dosto, just a portrait that happened to be used as the cover for quite a few of his works, for whatever reason.
Perhaps. I know he wasn't a fan of atheists, leftists, or hedonists, however.
He was a socialist for a while tho, and was addicted to gambling
nr9 is probably the cutest member on this forum.
hmmm, I think much of what he did was to protect himself and avoid the guillotine for a second time
but hedonists? seems unlikely... also, you're obsessed
In his later years he became an ardent supporter of the Tsar and he very much saw his gambling addiction as something shameful.
That's true
what about his many adulterous relationships?
what a superficial manner of seeing thingshmmm, I think much of what he did was to protect himself and avoid the guillotine for a second time
but hedonists? seems unlikely... also, you're obsessed
it wasn't me to complain ; )
its funny cuz u seem to be one of the most superficial here. guess we use our own worst insults to others eh?
That's Ivan Kramskoy, famous Russian realist painter and portraitist of the late 20th century.
You're not wrong.
According to Gulenko >
Especially within group dynamics, IEEs can often strike me as "phony" in a demonstrative Fe sense and it can be irritating af. ooo does a lot of ( ; and ( : and <3 among other things and I always think "nobody is that goddamned perky/sweet/happy," save for fake ass IEEs. EIIs are Fe ignoring and in my experience, almost never come across as disingenuously "too much" with Fe. I'm not saying that she is actually being disingenuous, but just that she comes off that way to me, which is one of the ways that identifies her as my benefactor, and, therefore, IEE. This aspect of the benefit dynamic rings true for me because, based on experience, I know that SLEs may think I look like a Ne "goofball" when I'm flexing it too much in a group situation. The look on their faces transmits something akin to "sit your ass down." lol I often feel similarly towards IEEs.At the same time there is something in behavior of benefactor that the beneficiary finds irritating. Those features that the benefactor demonstratively puts forward to attract attention and look good in public view seep into the subconscious of the beneficiary and awaken a vague desire to remove the conditions that make the benefactor act so unnaturally. The beneficiary may also be unaware what is it exactly that he is supposed to do? The issued request is not individual, but social in nature i.e. it encompasses problems of the groups of people to which this pair belongs.
: )
When one's only lens is philandry, everything begins to look like fucking somebody else's husband
lol, the more bs u type the more u look like a drunk mama fkr
cute : )
So this is the insults thread?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote