Both IEI and EII are called fawning lackeys by the other. (Socionics Russian literature) Maybe that is their social roles.
Both IEI and EII are called fawning lackeys by the other. (Socionics Russian literature) Maybe that is their social roles.
This actually reminds me of one of my favourite scenes from movies and books:
"The Hogfather" by T. Pratchett.All right," said Susan. "I'm not stupid. You're saying humans need... fantasies to make life bearable."
REALLY? AS IF IT WAS SOME KIND OF PINK PILL? NO. HUMANS NEED FANTASY TO BE HUMAN. TO BE THE PLACE WHERE THE FALLING ANGEL MEETS THE RISING APE.
"Tooth fairies? Hogfathers? Little—"
YES. AS PRACTICE. YOU HAVE TO START OUT LEARNING TO BELIEVE THE LITTLE LIES.
"So we can believe the big ones?"
YES. JUSTICE. MERCY. DUTY. THAT SORT OF THING.
"They're not the same at all!"
YOU THINK SO? THEN TAKE THE UNIVERSE AND GRIND IT DOWN TO THE FINEST POWDER AND SIEVE IT THROUGH THE FINEST SIEVE AND THEN SHOW ME ONE ATOM OF JUSTICE, ONE MOLECULE OF MERCY. AND YET—Death waved a hand. AND YET YOU ACT AS IF THERE IS SOME IDEAL ORDER IN THE WORLD, AS IF THERE IS SOME...SOME RIGHTNESS IN THE UNIVERSE BY WHICH IT MAY BE JUDGED.
"Yes, but people have got to believe that, or what's the point—"
MY POINT EXACTLY
You need to believe in things that aren't true. How else can they become?
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
Bend over
Generally I like what these posts are saying but I’m not sure I need someone to just fawn over me all the time. That’s probably more like LSE. It could be a subtype thing or whatever, but I value ambition and success a lot in men (and women) I’ve realized. I need to have relationships that are centered around supporting each other in achieving these ambitions, and where self-betterment is a necessity. I’m always attracted to people who are trying and in the middle of achieving big scale dreams from relatively somewhat humble beginnings. What I don’t care about I suppose are unique artistic projects; I mean no problem if it’s what other people are into, it’s just not personally attractive for me.
However, I do think it’s true that I take up a lot of “space” and need a lot of space... idk how else to put it. Someone who uses and takes up a lot of space and energy too is burn-outy for me. A relationship can be maintained but there needs to be lots of space between us.
Welcome to Ni beta shit brah.its freaky Lol . Quadra and social mission is always there,even if socioics don't exist. Socioics just make note out of it.
out of Filatova's book
I remember correctly, you've been a tour guide too?
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Here is the quote from a VK socionics site:
"In conflict dyads there is an almost identical view of the opposing dyad, which goes something like this:
Zhukov and Esenin vs. Stirlitz and Dostoevsky
Us: the almighty god of Olympus and his favorite kind gentle pussy.
Them: a cruel tyrant and his useless fawning lackey.
"
I see the IEI as a more gang tagalong version of a fawney lackey. The court jester. Or the mysterious hot girl that gets everyone.
The LSE EII version is more about the project managers right hand man/woman.
Both versions basically play 'the bestie' role.
@silke
This is just fun--->
This was posted by an EIE in one of the VK socionics groups:
"In conflict dyads there is an almost identical view of the opposing dyad, which goes something like this:
Hugo and Robespierre vs. Napoleon and Balzac
Us: one very smart dude, and the other's all hip and the soul of any company.
Them: two grimacing idiots.
Zhukov and Esenin vs. Stirlitz and Dostoevsky
Us: the almighty god of Olympus and his favorite kind gentle pusechka.
Them: a cruel tyrant and his useless fawning lackey.
Don Quixote and Dumas vs. Jack and Dreiser
Us: an unrivaled genius and a "grey cardinal".
Them: a vulgar clod with a stick up one place and a desperate housewife.
Hamlet and Maxim vs. Huxley and Gabin
Us: an artful manipulator and a chill hero of "Equilibrium".
Them: a quarrelsome histrionic and an object of furniture.
@Megatrop Your phraseology doesn't seem IEI-like although your questions seem to have that tinge of IEI self-doubt.
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...iption-by-I-O?
a.k.a. I/O
No. It's just a thread from someone who thinks that has wasted a lot of potential in life and wants to make some meaningful impact. It's not about purpose. It's about recognizing what's already there, a tendency among a certain type to play a certain role. It is a metaphorical term that emphazises the areas in life that have a lot of potential, a possible path of least resistance. PLEASE, DON'T TAKE THE WORD "MISSION" TOO LITERALLY.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Nothing really.
In all honesty Im' pretty shitty and useless. The very word "mission" kind of scares me because I mean it naturally carries with it this level of Te/Fi prestige I'm not fully comfortable with.
But that is actually a great strength as I know when to avoid/evade things and let it go and I realize well that thought-words are weapons and that healing things often requires a simple gentle sadness & solitude. "Least said soonest mended." Although that might seem more SEI/EII-ish, like Pookie said, IEIs know how to be good people really well when we try to be, when we want to be. There is a lot of goodness in Te and effort though that the IEI needs to work with in order to truly shine.
So many people get involved with something and thinking they're "making a difference" but in all reality they are fucking things up even more and making more problems in the world that another group of extroverts have to correct that person's fuck-up and so and on so forth. So people call IEIs "too lazy" but we're really just letting nature heal the wounds inflicted by extroverts.
I have to tell people all the time 'you're not helping as much as you think you are, you know that right?' Then they go 'BUT AT LEAST I'M DOING SOMETHING WITH MY LIFE AND EARNING MORE MONEY THAN YOU ARE AND LIVING IN THE REAL WORLD UNLIKE YOU, YOU LOSER. I AM PROFESSIONAL AND YOU ARE NOT!'
And it all could be avoided and the world could heal and be a beautiful place again of loving gay forestry if people just minded their own business and ignored/loved one another from a safe distance and jacked off to their own pervy fantasies like an IEI would. ppl would tell me growing up "don't be so shy you emo loser Carrie, get involved more!" but they didn't realize that was the infectious sickness that was ruining things in the first place. School as an institution didn't need to exist as it was formulated out of arrogant ego and not out of true love, but misguided "good" intentions. Same thing with many corporations.
BND YOUR TE POLR IS SHOWING. Yeah true but you know I'm right anyway.
Although I have been posting more lately so I know I am 'damaging things' with words. You can't help but say anything and not offend *somebody* no matter how sugary sweet Disney gay boi like you make it, in fact- that often pisses people off even more. Trying so hard not to be offensive and you end up really offending much more than you think, what Betas tell Deltas & Alphas all the time. But I mean still. I am a hybrid magic DPS/Healer class after all.
If Trump is EIE/IEI, we all ought to know what social mission they're on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology
An optimist - does not get discouraged under any circumstances. Life upheavals and stressful events only toughen him and make more confident. He likes to laugh and entertain people. Enters contact with someone by involving him with a humorous remark. His humor is often sly and contain hints and double meanings. Easily enters into arguments and bets, especially if he is challenged. When arguing his points is often ironic, ridicules the views of his opponent. His irritability and hot temper may be unpleasant to others. However, he himself is not perceptive of this and believes that he is simply exchanging opinions.
http://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=LIE_Profile_by_Gulenko
From Oldhamish personality style (that might blend into pathology) they seem to hit close to dependent box many times. I recommend to read Millon's book. So some sort of personal cheerleader.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Off the top of my head..being an annoying reminder to people (through example or discussion) that they should be less selfish, and should think about how their behaviour or words affect other people- (their feelings or stress levels.) Keeping people in check..trying to reduce the dog eat dog mentality of the world. Trying to reduce the tit for tat mentality of the world which can so quickly spiral out of control into much pain and many more problems. Trying to stop people spreading hate and anger.
At the same time..encouraging people to talk about their problems and concerns and listening to them, trying to empathise.
Sticking up for vulnerable, unprivileged people...or those who are struggling or whose problems are going unnoticed.
Showing love and care to people who show it to me..(not because they do it to me, but because it’s important for people to feel that their love is valued) and for people to bring out the love and happiness in each other..and being a caring friend and respectful colleague.
edit: (I’m 100% sure I’m IEI)
Last edited by Bethanyclaire; 02-06-2021 at 12:46 PM.
IEIs are creators of narratives. This means they are natural actors (generally more Fe) and artists (generally more Ni subtypey). Diplomacy and tact are tools (Fi) used for end's means (Se Ti). All good at drawing you in for a cause, if they wish to do so. The cause could be for the good of humanity or it could be a purely selfish one. Good at garnering sympathy. Realizing individual potential and being fanatically altruistic is generally more of a Delta NF thing, I feel. Both EIEs and IEIs are good at creating images to support their narratives. EIEs profess more the "mover and shaker" aspect and IEIs a more passive existence, carving out and refining their narrative over time. More intellectual IEIs resemble ILIs in the seer/oracle/predictors of da Way faucet. It's kind of sad because most IEIs IRL I've met are kind of shallow/unstable (Fe) or too inert to realize their full potential (Ni), I suppose their duals help in this aspect.
edit: realizing the "beauty of existence" and "inspirer" is a role that can be applied to all 4 NFs, all in a slightly different way. Likewise STs are in theory the most adept executioners of visions.
Vitality- EIE
Muse- IEI
Idealism- EII
Potential- IEE
Last edited by Tzuyu; 02-04-2021 at 08:07 PM.
I find myself naturally “symbiotically linking” to other people and follow them like a stray puppy. They help me avoid weathering down into some detritus (poor sensing and logic) and I offer them my ability to see things beyond their periphery. You could say people give me piggyback rides while I help them not get lost and discouraged on their (or our) journey. Some people are well suited for this arrangement, and others are not.
A lot like Mimir from God of War if he were an IEI: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uG2bR8B8UOc
(Mimir is actually probably some ENTx type)
I agree with what @Eli said ⇑⇑
Last edited by Djinn; 02-04-2021 at 07:38 PM. Reason: I wanted to post a picture of a piggyback ride through a maze, but it is not showing up :(
Really? I’m definitely iei. I suppose iei and eii can look similar. And maybe an eii might seem more like this outwardly..I mean, I’m not sure people would exactly notice me doing all the above..but I think I get those messages out to people subtly. And sometimes they will notice and sometimes they will stop and think about it.
Ok so the bit about showing love and care..I guess you could say I do want to receive it back (I do haha). But only because deep down I just know it’s so obvious that all humans need love. Everyone is fragile and we all need people to lean on, and loving each other or looking after each other is essentially what makes us human and makes life worth living.
Lyrics from the Smiths keep coming to mind.. ‘I am human and I need to be loved..’.. ‘It takes guts/strength to be gentle and kind’. I suppose it isn’t easy to be caring to other people..because our values can so often be in conflict, as socionics shows. But we do need each other, or at least we are better off together…so when we find a way to work together to enrich each other’s lives, I think it’s pretty cool
I love this...
I really want to think more about this kind of thing, read up on Jung/ archetypes etc. I had a really hard time recently, feeling like life had no purpose..but I've been slowly starting to feel a sort of 'connectedness' to the people of the past and maybe future too. Before discovering Socionics, I loved the idea of just being limitlessly kind and loving..(god knows what I was actually like lol) and socionics made me realise I couldn't and shouldn't expect that from other people..and that it was not a healthy mentality to have for myself either.
But yes, I think I like the idea of feeling a more wider sense of purpose now..
I like what you say about 'te' too, it's very interesting to think about the strengths of the polr.. or the weaker functions.