How did this happen or how does it happen?
I am looking at very young pictures of myself and seems that it’s always been like this
How did this happen or how does it happen?
I am looking at very young pictures of myself and seems that it’s always been like this
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
then: no one told you to sit upright and that resulted in a bad habit.
these days a smartphone is enough to fuck with your posture
the word you're looking for is "stooped" and it's not type related
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I see... it was EII who burned down Notre Dame. Keep good care of your backside or else you end up being unfortunate quasimodo (or ILI professor who walked in extremely crooked position).
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Beskova EII
“EIIs may look fragile or loose in their body, and are sometimes a bit stoop-shouldered.”
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
a picture full of EIIs
(jk, first guy on the left is SEE, second guy on the right is LSI, the girl on the back at boss seat is probably SEI)
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
yeah..
(two of the same peeps from before)
For the record, I have stooped posture, just like my LIE dad and LSE grandma. My SLI mom cannot stoop; physically impossible. Related to the spinal makeup.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
BeskovaReliable, proper, responsible, MAXIM is distinguished by good posture and wide straight shoulders - he has a true military bearing.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
maybe VI is a bit contradictory?
I have extremely stooped and awkward postures - often becoming aware of this, which worsens it. If Socionics is to be applied, it is probably p>j thing.
I've always sat like that since I was a kid for the simple reason that it's more comfortable.
it's not more EII related than to other N and to some degree I types
which have worse physical selfcontrol and may miss what they do, may adopt to sit for long near computer or books in such way, having lesser physical activity and worse developed muscles to hold the body as should
though mb at any type, while your EIE being N is among more expected ones
Re:
How did this happen or how does it happen?
I am looking at very young pictures of myself and seems that it’s always been like this
Kyphosis, can be treated unless maybe you were born with it and it is severe? My cousin has a mild case but she wore a brace which prevented that stooped look from ever happening. Good thing her parents caught it when she was child. In most people it isn't very noticeable until they get old. It is different from slouching which I do on the computer but I don't have this. My spine is fine.
It is probably genetic. If you don't want issues when you get older you might want to look into treating it before it is too late.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
There are so many more great LSE in the world to everyone who gets put off by one. Go find another. It will improve your life
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Here’s Dostoevsky
2AF8A076-1F4B-4E52-AB75-35A588B4D6AE.jpeg
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I have the impression BS is trolling us all
That felt great.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
glad you're having fun!
Kierkegaard had it too. Adding this since the op asks why this could be. It might save someone from losing some inches as they get older. I don't have many inches to spare. :/ I admit I have been more aware of my posture than usual reading this thread. It isn't too bad but I have brought my laptop up level to my eyes. lol
"I confess to being put off when the “diagnosis”--“hunchback”--is listed among Kierkegaard’s major maladies. For me “hunchback” somehow conflates into Hugo’s Quasimodo, an image that carries with it conscious and unconscious revulsion and/or pity over his horrid deformity. I believe this psychological content helps fuel biases—e.g., a hidden explanation for the actions of this “isolated, asocial” individual. Although we have only one idealized portrait and several caricatures to go by, I am confident that Kierkegaard was no Quasimodo. The medical term for forward bending of the spine is called kyphosis; present normally to a mild degree in all of us in our upper back. Certain disease processes will accentuate this bend, causing a “hump.” Linguistically sterile the word kyphosis may be, but blessed by absence of the psychological or sociological content Hugo gave it. Clearly Kierkegaard exhibited a significant, probably abnormal kyphosis.
Several disorders could well have been its cause. X-ray films of pathological kyphosis will show collapse of the front side of one or more vertebral bodies, the 24 mobile hockey-puck shaped bones which make up the weight bearing anatomy of the spine. The affected body will be wedged shaped, the apex to the front, producing a forward thrust of the column above it and the noticeable “hump” over the site on the individual’s back. Sometimes, in order to bring one’s weight back over his or her hips, an individual will develop an increase of the normal low back (sway-back) lordosis below the affected area, an observation seemingly caught by Klaestrup.
Kyphosis can be associated with rare severe inherited metabolic disorders resulting in structural weakness in the building blocks of skin, bone, cartilage, tendons, and related tissues. Invariably these illnesses exhibit striking features, such as those captured by Hugo (and Chaney). Most often these individuals also have a lateral twisting of the spine called scoliosis, the combination called kypho-scoliosis, a finding not apparent in our images of Kierkegaard.
More commonly, one or two vertebrae, particularly those in the thoracic region can collapse in a wedge seemingly spontaneously—an occurrence in an otherwise normal person. The condition occurs frequently enough to bear the name Scheuermann’s disease. Believed to be a disorder of the growth process, Scheuermann’s often will first appear at the onset of puberty. If not corrected, the condition is permanent. Most often it remains stable, the individual affected only by the appearance of the hump. However it can be severe enough to compress the nerves that comprise the spinal cord and cause varying symptoms of neuronal damage below the defect, ranging from abdominal pain, to sphincter problems to lower leg paralysis. When one considers that no mention ever was made of the hump until Kierkegaard’s adulthood, Scheuermann’s could well explain the notorious hump and its consequences."
Søren Kierkegaard Newsletter 49 - St. Olaf College
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I’ve been to a doctor. Never lost height and in perfect health
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
One aspect of xII/se PoLR that definitely applies to me is physical appearance/facial expressions, being somewhat ungainly in the way that I walk. I've constantly been told to work on my posture. I may end up leaning back instead of leaning forward, so a lot to work on...
I have gotten better with posture, at least with going horsebackriding but I think I will always be a bit on the klutzy side. In order for a horse to trust you, you need to show confident posture and give off a calm energy. They are herd animals so they rely a lot on trusting one another and groups. Also, I've been taking up piano and this helps with posture. I do have mild scoliosis, nothing serious so that's part of it.
xII se PoLR, 9w1-5w4-2w3 sp/so
Phlegmatic-Melancholic |RCoAI| Fascinator| Newtype-secondary| LEFVl|
#JusticeforJeb_, Water Sheep did nothing wrong, High Inquisitor Of Council of Water Sheep and Water Sheep's protector
Make things right? Who are we to decide when things are right and when they need to be fixed?