What do you think, @Adam Strange? You typed me LII as well.
What do you think, @Adam Strange? You typed me LII as well.
Hi Para,
I think you are an I and F type, fwiw. Maybe LII just by overall persona.
SEI, IEI could be possible.
@Adam Strange @Finaplex
Thank you.
Seems to be consensus on Introverted type.
@para
Impression-based typing has failed me (probably because I'm very new at it). Having watched your video, I don't think you're ILI or LII. Ni is apparent, but I think you're an ethical type. Consider the options. If you were LII, then your phrases would be bounded by structure given that Ti would be your default mode of processing; however, even outside the context of metaphors, your words are often deliberately vague/ambiguous. That makes them more poetic at the cost of comprehensibility by the listener. This isn't a good or bad thing, just something I noticed. I think an Ni demonstrative type would use the vagueness of Ni more strictly i.e. to create analogies or metaphors rather than as a base means of communication like you seem to use it. I think they would use Ni as a tool to further their Ji program - to add ambiguity in situations where precision or firm judgment is not possible. So, I think Ni base is more likely. Some more evidence in support of that regards your relationship with your body. To paraphrase, you say that you are very anxious about typically Si aspects (sleep schedule, food intake, bodily signals). That sounds like Si role to me since Reinin describes the role function as the "zone of fears" function. It's the function that we don't "value" (I put quotations because value here is a little ambiguous - we all love good food, but that doesn't mean we value Si) but still want to maintain according to societal standards. Si role types don't want to deal with Si related things but still feel guilt or anxiety when they neglect it too much - it is in the superego block, after all.
Some evidence against this: you say that foresight, seeing the best option, etc. have not "captured [you] or been [your] drive". This would be unlikely for an Ni dominant type as Ni would be the central value. However, the value comes more in the form of thinking and imagining these options rather than just using foresight. It's about creating mental imagery with regards to how processes are likely to unfold. Does this sound like you?
I don't have as good a reason to distinguish between IEI and ILI. You don't seem as disagreeable or negativist as a typical ILI would be, which leans me towards IEI. However, you demonstrate very little Fe in this video, which would point against that. I think your method of communication fits an IEI's better than an ILI's - it's more expressive than it is factual. Moreover, you just "seem" more like an IEI than an ILI, which is an irrational thing to say but one that I think fits nonetheless. Perhaps your main interests could distinguish between Te valuing and Fe valuing. Te valuers pay more attention to finances, factual data, technical subjects, etc. Fe valuers pay more attention to emotions, expression, understanding others, etc. Having one valued means the other is PoLR if you are Ni base, meaning that it can make a big difference.
The last thing I should say with respect to socionics is that you do give me an EII impression in your video. However, besides the "wanting to be true to yourself" comments (which could also be Fe), I couldn't naturally connect anything you were saying to Fi base, so I don't think it's likely. Some of the stuff you say in the first 5 minutes or so could be connected, but I think it's more Ni than Fi (self-awareness is a subtle thing to talk about with respect to Ni and Fi). I think the impression comes from the fact that EIIs are typically very peaceful, emotionally unexpressive people, and so they present themselves very similarly to type 9s.
Enneagram-wise, I think you are certainly an ego type (5, 9, or 4). Your tritype could perhaps be all three (my guess is 954), though tritype is debated and so I'll let you determine if you want to use it or not. I don't think 4 is as likely since it's primarily concerned with creating a personal and unique identity, which you didn't really talk about in the values section. My guess is that a 4 would talk much more about that since forming a unique identity is their core motivation.
Of the two types, I think type 9 is more likely than type 5 since you don't really talk about a fear of incompetence or not having enough knowledge to survive in the outside world (or anything related to that since the chances of talking about those particular things is near 0 unless you're talking about it in an enneagram context). That being said, unless you're a 1 dimensional person, determining core fears and motivations tends to require more information and a lot of self-reflection. However, I think 5w4 and 9wX are likely possibilities (I'm uncertain about the 9 wing).
----- FarDraft, 2020
@FarDraft
Thank you for the comprehensive and thoughtful write-up, it is very considerate of you. (now i feel bad at how sloppy my own was )
This is something that definitely could be an argument for ethical type. I have a distinct tendency to regard language as something which does not tell truth or exactness by itself, but that it can inspire and create internal situations of importance, so to speak. I regard logical consistency as important, but only if that is a premise that is agreed upon. Language does not have to conform to those 'barriers', if that isn't the ultimate teleology or finality of it. I regard the imagery that language can create in oneself to be of larger importance than a consistency that ultimately says nothing about the world or us. (of course, the structure itself says something about the world, it just does not directly appeal to my personal meaning.)Having watched your video, I don't think you're ILI or LII. Ni is apparent, but I think you're an ethical type. Consider the options. If you were LII, then your phrases would be bounded by structure given that Ti would be your default mode of processing; however, even outside the context of metaphors, your words are often deliberately vague/ambiguous. That makes them more poetic at the cost of comprehensibility by the listener.
To concretely adress what you've written here, i've often been criticised for exactly that - vagueness that is too general, overarching or non-concrete. It seems that, to some and even myself sometimes, i speak, think and write for my own personal unfolding. This seems to fit together with the idea that i wish to imbue imagery or meaning in my communication, and not necessarily strict, factual, logical connections.
I do not directly relate with ''seeing the best option'', although this might just be circumstantial, in that a lack of situations where i can express that ability in a formulaic way. (if i do possess it)Some evidence against this: you say that foresight, seeing the best option, etc. have not "captured [you] or been [your] drive". This would be unlikely for an Ni dominant type as Ni would be the central value. However, the value comes more in the form of thinking and imagining these options rather than just using foresight. It's about creating mental imagery with regards to how processes are likely to unfold. Does this sound like you?
But, the imagining of processes/states/thoughts in abstract imagery and imagining of various outcomes i can relate to - the things i imagine are often fantastical or not bound to things i might consider (which i think seems more Ne than Ni valuing), but they often come in themes, feelings, nebulousness. I also have a tendency to observe and mold my thoughts and perception to the point where i often fall into doubt whether my thoughts really are 'primordial and inherent' or constructed by my own inevitable understanding of Socionics. (they're both correct)
I derive great satisfaction and self-strengthening in my imagination, and i imagine it as the core of myself - but this is a facet that all humans possess, i would imagine.
I usually am more factually oriented in communication with others, but internally i am more oriented towards images, sensations, pulses, feelings, thoughts etc.I don't have as good a reason to distinguish between IEI and ILI. You don't seem as disagreeable or negativist as a typical ILI would be, which leans me towards IEI. However, you demonstrate very little Fe in this video, which would point against that. I think your method of communication fits an IEI's better than an ILI's - it's more expressive than it is factual. Moreover, you just "seem" more like an IEI than an ILI, which is an irrational thing to say but one that I think fits nonetheless. Perhaps your main interests could distinguish between Te valuing and Fe valuing. Te valuers pay more attention to finances, factual data, technical subjects, etc. Fe valuers pay more attention to emotions, expression, understanding others, etc. Having one valued means the other is PoLR if you are Ni base, meaning that it can make a big difference.
I have no real drive to really express and undestand, to be a guidance in the emotional realm to others. So i have thought T type based on not my focus on *logic*, but on my lack of focus on ethics, externally. I have often been criticised for being selfish, criticial, cynical IN prescence of others, but i am much softer, more sage-like alone. I often feel troubled by my communication with others, as if i don't really understand how to act, and i have a distinct disregard for the traditions and ways of the world, something i see more as Fe PoLR than anything else - disregard of the external ethical situation. Where i do feel a responsibility is in moral actions towards others and fairness, although i can't always uphold this ideal - which i've interpreted as low, but valued Fi. How i appear in the video is a lot more like my internal world, since i did not take notice of my problems with communication there - i want to stress still that English is not my mother tounge, so vagueness might also stem from that to a certain extent.
I do not think i am EII, based on the simple fact that i do not think i am rational. I did type as LII first, though.
I have not really gotten into enneagram much, so i'll refrain from commenting at the moment. I will take your suggestions into consideration, though.
I hope this is intelligible, i've written it hastily.
Sol cognizes morality through Fi/Ne. His response from "what is morality?", as follows:
For Fi/Ne confirmation on Sol, see Beautiful Sky's more elaborative reply:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...orality-to-you
This is about as antithetical to Ni-lead cognition as is humanly possible:
Fe/Si (^) aptly expresses and reflects mainstream values. Obvious Ni PoLr is obvious.
I said to take it with a grain of salt for a reason. Those aren't my complete thoughts since my analysis of life isn't 9 bloody sentences. And if I'm so wrong, mind explaining, in detail, why I'm wrong? Perhaps you could explain, in detail, why this one piece of data is enough to conclude Ni PoLR? How are these mainstream in the first place? Do you actually think I explained all my thoughts? Is everyone with "mainstream" views Ni PoLR? What are your methods? Explain or none of your comments mean anything to me and anyone else with a brain.
I asked for justification, not for you to make a fool of yourself. Step up your game. Actually face my challenges for once instead hiding behind the veneer of idiotic comments with no substance. You're supposed to be good at analyzing things, right? So fucking do it.
EDIT: I should also add that if you want me to take you more seriously, then actually respond to my responses. If you're not willing to engage in a discussion, then I have no reason to listen since you'd just be a close-minded, irrational person. I have no problem with holding my own intellectually. If you want to see if I'm lying about that, then debate me in your responses rather than creating bland over-generalizations and providing nothing of substance.
EDIT2: To not be a hypocrite, let me add this critique. Let's assume that that post isn't Ni lead cognition, even when that post is completely outside the dominion of evidence that can be used to determine cognition. Then, what type of cognition is it? You claim it's Ni PoLR. That would imply that I lack the ability to accurately manage time and lack the ability to construct the whole picture from the details. If I were poor at time management, then I would not have survived as long as I have (survived I mean actually doing decently and stuff). Given that my parents forced me to undertake a number of extra-curricular activities in high school, not having strong time management skills would have meant that I was under constant stress or continually on the move. But instead I was as languid as I am currently and I never missed a deadline. Moreover, constructing the system from the details is essentially interpolating by creating linear and nonlinear connections. Any sort of problem solving requires such thinking and I think I'm pretty good at problem solving. I should also add that I'm not one to mistime actions. I'm not an impulsive person and so I know when to do things and when not to do them. This was actually a praise from my taekwondo coach since, when sparring, I knew exactly when to move and which attacks were coming.
I'm bragging too much... perhaps I am a 3...... or maybe I'm just not being asked the right questions to actually reveal my weaknesses...
Last edited by FarDraft; 04-02-2019 at 02:24 AM.
----- FarDraft, 2020
This may be impolite, but...
Do you have an opinion on my type, @Kill4Me?
New Additions: Oppai Anschluss, Alonzo, Fardraft, VenusRose, lelelewomanwomanwoman, Floozy, Araz
ILE-Ti: Myst, Transkar, LuchoisLurking, JWC3, MadCity, Troll NR 007, Falsehope
ILE-Ne: Geneiouws, Lagerdemon, Cubazoan, Nickelslick, Hitta, dangerbird89
ESE-Fe: Chipsnunderwear, Suz, Inumbra, Subteigh, Kalinoche, FlutteringShyx, Mrrrmaid, Fardraft
ESE-Si: Mu4, Wacey, Xerx, Esaman, KrigtheViking, Hacim, Little Timmy
LII-Ti: N0ki/Zap, Muddy, Reactance, User Name, Bertrand
LII-Ne: Kimuchi/kimu, Zero, Vers, Vesstheastralsilky
SEI-Si: johannesbloem, chriscorey, the whole English, lelelewomanwomanwoman
SEI-Fe: BnD, crazedrat, dinky, Neokortex, Pallas Athena, Coeruleum
SLE-Se: herzy, mercutio/satan, ananke, idontgiveaf
SLE-Ti: agee, kill4me
LSI-Se: Spider, Missbabydoll, Pole, Aramas, Karatos
LSI-Ti: Rocky, Hamouchou
IEI-Fe: Allie, Pink, SisofNight, Cassandra, Fay, Summer Princess, Xiavay
IEI-Ni: Starfall/Fox, Glam, Elina, Strrrng, Velvet, Penny Dreadful
EIE-Fe: Cuivienen, Alonzo
EIE-Ni: Gilly, Darya, Bain, Sarinana
SEE-Se: Woofwoofl, Handjob, Number9Large
SEE-Fi: Lucas, Aquagraph, Chae, Vogue Paris, Totalize, Schwiftyrickity, Niko
LIE-Ni: Ineffable, Moonraker, Avebury
LIE-Te: Ashton, FDG, Expat, Invisiblehim, Narc, Anglas
ESI-Se: DiscoJoe, EJArendee, Jet City Woman, MisterNi, Scarletluxx, Amber/Rosewood, Strangeling, Oppai Anschluss
ESI-Fi: Lungs, Golden, Ouronis, Radio, Suedehead, Galen, Kore/Persephone, Delilah, the Locust, Saiorse, Hag
ILI-Ni: Scapegrace, Korpsey, Krieger, Cpig, InvisibleJim, Floozy
ILI-Te: Marie, Mensupermateriam, Aestrivex, Crispy, Soupman
SLI-Si: Words, Stray, Scarper, LuminousLynx, Lord Pixel
SLI-Te: kim, daft punk, directorabbie, pookie, Jessica, may, supremacist, plasmatorpedo1043, Araz
LSE-Te: Absurd, JimBean, QueenTiger
LSE-Si: William, JackOliverAaron/Echidna1000, BurningIce, Timmy, Smilingeyes, Laurie’s Crusader, Viktor, Kingslayer
IEE-Ne: Elizathomason, UDP, Sapphire, Syrup De Gem, Pinoline, Azbestos, Nanashi, VenusRose
IEE-Fi: Finale, Airman/airborne, Adam Strange, Prince Andrei, Niffer, Eos
EII-Ne: Aylen, Epheme, Wasp, Tpaduan
EII-Fi: maritsa/beautiful sky, mikemex, IBTL, contra, sol, suintal/silke, tela/arachne, Olimpia, thehotelambush, Yaaroslav
Last edited by Kill4Me; 04-02-2019 at 02:52 PM.
add me pls@Kill4me xoxo
SLE, they can’t see hidden factors. Only what is shown.
The special snowflake kind of SLE who understands introverted feeling so well that they spend years evaluating it (and its position and value) plus the inner motivations, hopes, dreams and fears of forum members and celebs (2500+). Sounds legit.
I haven't met one of those irl.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
What’s wrong with it—or what’s short-sighted in it—is you are not going to magically end up doing what you love by doing what you do not love.
If someone manages to find a passion in this age of indifference, they should pursue it. Whether they make it their paid work or not is a separate question, but I also don’t agree that work has to be “grinding” torture day upon year unless that is the masochism someone is into.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
Hmm, maybe its just really strong Ti, and its so visual with all the pictures so outside sensing is fine there. His assesment of Hotel was weird: why wouldn’t an intelligent Ti type cast a wide net by asking questions in the Questionaire that would capture inner ethical types? Like, that doesn’t make the asker that type themselves, that makes them clever. Duh.
Or maybe he is Ti polr... hard to say from his forum presence. I may say more about this later. I will think about it and get back to you.
If you do see a case for strong Ti then I think it is worth considering LxI too. Maybe LSE or SLI as well since they have strong Se too.
*it isn't visual with everyone since he has not seen me except for a blurry childhood pic. I don't know how many he has seen from the forum that made it to his list. Maybe about half of them. You are on his list too so do you agree with his typing of you?
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yeah Se doesn’t translate well into the online world without looking edge lordy. We’ve all seen the none Se types make lots of tough guy claims over the years.
Se is a kind of intuitive perception of reality at its core. Not intellectual in the least, although it could be. Its pure perception.
K4 does pick out lots of SLE celebrities, so that’s pretty accurate.
His own systems of relations is very well developed. And it seems like creative use, so very fluid in approuch and not dogmatic, just as you would expect for creative use of a IE.
He does post a lot of STs some of which are SLE. I think he admires them on some level. I never asked if he does. It is an assumption. I know two guys he has said he admires. Gene Simmons of KISS and Frank Sinatra. I think they are role models. I have seen a lot of weak Se males do the edgelord thing on various forums. Then I see them on video and they are soft as a baby's bottom. It is such a huge difference between their online persona and video presence it should be shocking but it no longer is so I am skeptical of tryhards.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I think sometimes you have to do what you don't "love" as a stepping stone to what you do love. He is 17. I agree you can do what you love whether paid for it or not. I used a couple jobs as stepping stones to get me to where I am now. I didn't want to have to work a job after I turned 30 and I made that happen. Actually my parents made me work as soon as I was legally able to. My siblings and I all had part time jobs as soon as we were able to. We didn't love it but we understood it. Now I do what I love and get paid for it when I want to do it. I can also turn projects down without worry.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I wasn't suggesting that you will magically end up doing what you love by doing what you don't love. I was suggesting that, oftentimes, doing what you love is not profitable and having the funds to be able to do what you love with comfort often requires taking up different jobs that are unrelated to your field of passion. I never said that you shouldn't pursue your hobby. I said that the likelihood of making money off your passion is minimal since the probability of your passion also being a field that's in high economic demand is small. This mostly pertains to people with hobbies in artistic fields that have never been incredibly profitable for the masses. Basically, having the passion to do something doesn't necessarily mean that you should pursue it as a career.
For example, according to dataUSA, in 2016, the average salary for a male musician/singer etc. is $44963 and for a female is $21805 (https://datausa.io/profile/soc/272040/). Moreover, the bureau of labour statistics shows that the states with highest employment level for musicians are New York (7640), California (6770), Tennessee (2140), Florida (1700), and Illinois (1610), with New York and California both being in the top 5 states with the highest cost of living (https://www.fool.com/slideshow/15-st...ving/?slide=15). Moreover, something like music is often a very unstable career since your work is often gig-by-gig, meaning that to thrive you need to have an entrepreneurial spirit. This is something that many do not have and it cannot be taken for granted. Also, in comparison to other careers, music is never in incredibly high demand since the arts are always specialized. Only a select few people want to enjoy a specific form of art, meaning that the growth rate within the country music market, for example, isn't likely to be high or, more importantly, predictable since trends within this industry are highly variable.
I don't say this to discourage people from pursuing music. In fact, pursuing these types of fields as a hobby should be encouraged since it diversifies interests in an age of indifference, like you noted. However, economic instability is often a cause of familial instability since if you're constantly under the stress of making your next pay-check, your mental health deteriorates. That being said, there are consequences in the rabid pursuit of wealth as well. Child neglect or stress due to competition is a real problem. The solution lies in balance and understanding how to manage career, personal satisfaction, and familial stability. This article is an interesting read relating to these topics. https://www.prb.org/family-instabili...omic-mobility/
I will agree that "grinding" was a poor choice of word there since it evokes powerful imagery that may not be equivalent to what I had in mind. When I wrote that, I was thinking about the physical intensity of blue collar work and the often monotonous "grind" of white-collar work. We do have to consider the future, though. While I haven't researched this thoroughly, automation is likely to reduce blue collar work significantly over the next few years. Moreover, artistic work can be emulated quite well by AI to where the differences between it and human-made art is difficult to notice. This means that, in the future, jobs relating to artistic passions are likely to decline. Again, this isn't to discourage people from pursuing art but rather to take into consideration the situation the world is in and how it can affect you in the short and long run.
----- FarDraft, 2020
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Sometimes I see SLE's who just sit there on top of the situation. The way they can know ahead time how the presence works without really trying is quite perplexing.
Then they ultimately fail to see underlying things that will twist it considerably and I remind them and they respond like 'Oh, shit.., yes.'.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
@Kill4Me
lol I appreciate you including me on your list, and even more for typing me as a EIE, seeing as how in my daily life, I aspire to that and milk my Role-Fe for all its worth.
But here's the thing, I ain't no damn Fe-empath, not one bit--I don't utilize affective empathy; I can't "feel" the emotions of others by way of "contagion." Instead, I utilize cognitive empathy (perspective taking) by way of Fi, and my ability to do this is rather limited and sometimes altogether impaired if I have no previous experiences that specifically relate to whatever it is that calls for my empathy. You can't watch me lose my shit in a thread where my already shoddy and decrepit Fi value system was compromised and then call me a EIE. lol
If you want to know how I think, take my own words:
SEI-posture is upright and “elegant “ with soft demeanor. Dresses somewhat bohemian in style. “Kind, courteous, soft - these are just a few of the adjectives that can be used to describe a typical female DUMAS. A charming femininity is characteristic for her, that would be complimented well by exquisite furs and headwear. Unusual elegance permeates her figure and bearing, even when she is dressed in her usual, daily clothing, since there is no angularity or abruptness in her movements. All her motion is graceful, softened, and smooth. ”
Final typing
Thanks for showing your true colors
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Looks at Beautiful sky's avatar
"SEI-posture is upright and “elegant “ with soft demeanor. Dresses somewhat bohemian in style. “Kind, courteous, soft - these are just a few of the adjectives that can be used to describe a typical female DUMAS. A charming femininity is characteristic for her, that would be complimented well by exquisite furs and headwear. Unusual elegance permeates her figure and bearing, even when she is dressed in her usual, daily clothing, since there is no angularity or abruptness in her movements. All her motion is graceful, softened, and smooth. ”
Final typing
Thanks for showing your true colors
Do we really need all this battletyping? This is not respectable behaviour for someone who aspires to be a psychologist.
How to type based on text snippets is beyond me
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I've asked Maritsa repeatedly to stop trying to push her typing on me. She's made her opinion clear (multiple, multiple times) and that should be enough. She has no kindness or understanding toward me, particularly with regard to her interactions with me, however, and despite previous warnings by moderators continues to harass me.
Here, publicly, I request that she entirely ignore me and never reference or speak to me unless it is a direct request to make peace. I believe that is a fair request, especially since she has asked similar of others.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org