Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - mb ILI
P.S.
European monarchs like Brits' queen are the "dictators" too
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - mb ILI
P.S.
European monarchs like Brits' queen are the "dictators" too
I can't attach pic as keyboard not working but I think George Costanza and his actor whose name eludes me is EII- Ne.
Jim Smyth, the guy conducting the interrogation - EII-Fi, the other dude is ESE sosp - kind of interesting how he gently presses him to a full confession by playing on his EJ-ness ("what do we do here? ... I'm lost, would you direct me?") as well as creative -ne ("you're running out of options here").
EII (Kodi)
EII-Fi
EII
Last edited by Mila; 11-03-2018 at 02:07 AM.
LSE
girl [3:46] - EII
Sally Field EII
Peter Falk "columbo" SLI
Lera Boroditsky - mb INFJ
Audrey EII, Samuel mb ESI
the girl - T, the dude - NOriginally Posted by BOT
Yanina Sokolovskaya - EII
Ksyusha Kartasheva - IEE
Curly Susie - ENFP
Last edited by Sol; 12-13-2018 at 02:44 AM.
Nerida Joy (celebrity esthetician) — LSE SP/SO
Love Lu - ENFP
thinks herself as ESTP. mb due to E8
ESFP is 2nd version
IEE
Vitalina Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya [blond] - INFJ
Lyubov Kuryanova [interviewer] - mb LSE
Jenna Ezarik (itsmejennae) - ENFP
Ivan obo vsyom (Иван обо всём) - LSE
Last edited by Sol; 01-03-2019 at 12:20 AM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Um, I wouldn't use Onision as an example of any type, though I personally (tentatively) type him ILE...
He's LSE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
OnisionSpeaks - N
Yep.
Dude's annoying af.
Chuggaaconroy.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evUwGUNhRiw
Chuggaaconroy - IEE i think?
@Sol what do you think?
it's possibly
SLI (-Si so/sx 9w1)
Male EII-Fi
Female probably LII or something.
@Cody I am curious - what types would you see for Trevor Noah and Liza Koshy?
I don't know them, do yo have some links?
"All nations will place their hope in him."
(Mt 12:21)
Ira Zakharova - INFJ
both seem ethical. She's probably Fe. I think he could be IEE.
You don't think she could be Ne-base?
My impression of her is Fe lead, not sure which one. I'd have to look more in detail her preferences. My guess is EIE but not %100 sure.
Ah interesting, she may have strong Fe, i dunno, but she seems Ne valuing to me...i havent watched too many of her things either. But yeah, by vibe i would think infantile and I don't see the 2D HA Se either, nor the very...how do i put it...theatrical vibe (not in a bad way!) that EIEs often give off, along with victim vibes. They come across somewhat more serious and heavy to me, though they can also joke but more so in an Se way. Like Ne is there, but it's just supporting their Fe and Se. She seems to spend a lot of time Ne-ing..or perhaps she is just ENFP on mbti haha idk.
His Fe is more subdued, yeah.
Has Idubbbz been typed? Delta Extrovert, I think? LSE over IEE I'd think.
N
Reason why? Appears like more emphasis on Te and no weak Ti
I was not about T.
Why - as common, my intuitive impressions from the nonverbal.
Such impressions are not worth much unless you can explain using the system.
A method is useful in case it gives practically useful results. Intuition (the process of which is impossobly to describe) is one of Jung's functions not lesser meaningful than others.
The system is the Jung's typology. The intuitive impressions are the descriptions of peoples traits in it.
The source of information as nonverbal and its intuitive analysis was objecively proved as useful for typing by higher than accidental matches in a experiment. Subjectively it's proved for years of my experience of watching peoples' traits and behavior after their types were supposed by nonverbal and then fited good to the theory.
There is my IR test which gives results better than accidental where types of examples were gotten by nonverbal mostly.
All that was explained before and was known to you. So your assertion is wrong, incompetent from theory point and rejects the known practice.
Last edited by Sol; 01-14-2019 at 11:51 AM.
What is the use of "nonverbal and its intuitive analysis" if you can't explain how you arrived at your conclusions?
"was objecively proved as useful for typing by higher than accidental matches in a experiment."
I don't care about the things you claim to have proven
"Subjectively it's proved for years of my experience of watching peoples' traits and behavior after their types were supposed by nonverbal and then fited good to the theory."
The problem with this approach is that, unless you can somehow show me how your impressions fit with the system, I don't care if you have ten thousand years of experience. Your method is not clarified. For all I know, you have been following a flawed method for years. How can I trust if you can't demonstrate how it works? You don't need to explain it here, you can simply link me to resources of yours which demonstrate how your typings have been "fited good to the theory"
"All that was explained before and was known to you. So your assertion is wrong, incompetent from theory point and rejects the known practice."
I asked you a very simple question. How did you conclude Idubbbz is an intuitive type? The only thing you have proven to me is that you're incapable of answering a simple question. It is an absolute embarrassment when a person claims to have such amazing Socioncs knowledge when they can't answer a simple question without resorting to demonstrating my incompetence. You just shifted the goal post here. What are you hoping to achieve? Really search inside of yourself and answer.
@Pano Lou
it's not needed to know how a TV works to use it. while you claimed above the opposite
read about intuition at Jung. try to use it for typing to notice positive results. then will be easier for you do not claim baseless nonsense that logical reasoning is the only way to type correctly
also look about "black box" models
Last edited by Sol; 01-14-2019 at 01:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
