@mrrrmaid
newcommer with a video. add, pls
@mrrrmaid
newcommer with a video. add, pls
@silke: you use some additional letters in your enneagram typings... e.g. "im so/sx" and "rea sx/sp". what do they stand for? i guess, rea = reactive (triad)?
Please add me, @Director Abbie
Sorry, I'm desperately trying to figure it out, but my phone is refusing to do so.
@Director Abbie , please could you add me? It's not letting me add anything. Do I need a PW or something now that some time has gone by since this was introduced?
Thanks.
4 people voted some sort of gamma SF for me . My Se is absolutely nonexistent, how can people see me as gamma SF? This is really a mystery for me, unless those people were just joking.
LOL
BTW: I do not type myself anything anymore. There are people here who think I'm an IEI and that's fine. Then there're those who don't think so and that's fine with me too. I'm just absolutely sure I'm not gamma and my Se is very weak. Hell place into any other quadra, but gamma is the biggest NO for me.
@Director Abbie
I would like to join as well.
Being interested in clothes and shoes doesnt imply sensing or SF at all, not even remotely.
The thing that you dont express Se doesnt mean you dont have such personality.
@Kara and @MrsTortilla, you've been added. Sorry for the delay.
That’s ok! Thanks!
Everyone that types me anything other than my selftyping are basement dwelling masturbators and incels. I've offered the same amount of evidence for my claim as they have.
I am talking to olimpia and eko, ofc.
You are wrong about me, though
Your disproportionate reactiveness is getting tiresome. How is it being upset and butthurt all the time? Seems exhausting.
It is just a typing, calm yo ballz.
Btw, whenever someone gets so upset about a typing, it just makes it seem even more like there could be truth to it.
Because, if it was really so absurd or besides the mark, why would you be upset about it? You would shrug and not take it seriously.
But it hits a nerve. For a good reason, usually.
@Director Abbie May I please be added? I want to be crucified by the masses, too
(@strangeling haha, good one)
I think it has more to do with the fact that others projecting an image of yourself unto you is annoying, and makes you feel llike you have to fit their vision of you.
Or at least, it can. It depends of how the person challenges your self-typing, with arguments or with bias. Alot of people have personal reasons for saying someone is not in their quadra, for example. That's bias.
yeah or the magic moment when you see someone who's talked trash of a specific type challenges your self typing to put you in the trashy bin who wouldn't enjoy that?
It's rather about their Ego getting hurt. They have developed this attachment to a certain image of themselves, and if you do not acknowledge that, they feel like it is an affront to their Ego. They feel slighted. And insecure, because how can you not see them the way they "are" (or rather, want to be seen)?! So they get upset. People are quite touchy when you invalidate their idealized view of themselves in any shape or form.
This is actually pretty much why I wrote my posts. Also, because I know myself more than you know me, and your knowledge of socionics is more limited when it comes to me than mine is. Claiming anything about me on this forum would be absurd, apart from a few people which I have had a deep verbal vivisection of my personality with. To be clear, you aint one of them.
I think both sides can be argued for. It is easy to step on and feel stepped on when we're discussing personality of individuals. The generalizing nature of systems like this tend to create this effect. I think it is important to be open to the one who is typing, but also the one who is the individual that seeks to be typed, or is being typed. That's partially why we're here, right? It isn't that hard to be considerate and tread lightly, not all people are ready to be told that they're ''completely wrong about themselves in Socionics'', they'll surely find out for themselves if they're being encouraged to learn and discuss.
Well, I find it a bit lame to get upset about being re-typed on a spreadsheet that is specifically about typing others. You gotta expect not everyone to agree. But hey, that's just me.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
The massive focus on Ne and the secondary Ti and the amount of Si he loves and needs and the fact he responds easily and well to Fe and is Alpha and Fi polr and the way he really likes SEIs and gets along well with SLIs and the way he doesn’t really understand gammas very well and the fact he is super irrational and quite extroverted and the help I got typing him years ago from people I trust and so on blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah he’s sort of a classic ILE not even hard to type blah blah
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
So, you do understand that people's attitude or perceived attitude towards a person can impact how that person takes something, and maybe can see where other people are coming from in their complaints to you now?
---
Btw, I don't hate you. In fact I said that you were similar to me in some aspects, and it was those aspects I associated with sensing. That you read this as an insult, well, maybe reread what you said regarding people's egos being hurt and the image they want to project. That you think it was an insult probably has more to do with the associations you've made with sensing and intuition than what I actually said.
I do think you have an ego, and are sensitive, and the way you type people strikingly reminds me of Maritsa and her approach. While you may not say, "You are X. Confirm and final" that's certainly the attitude you take and yes, I've made fun of you for this. Sometimes I'm not very nice. But I wasn't actually trying to hurt you by any of it.
@Director Abbie thanks!
You are not the only one who typed me as an Si type, so you are wrong in your assumption this is just about me getting my ego hurt over some typing.
This is about you attacking me as a person, continuously. I am not bothered by all the other ones who typed me as S, because they don't make it a personal matter of invalidating me. I don't believe that all S types are stupid or whatever. It is the way you single me out and sh*t on me and undermine me all the time. I got annoyed by it before, and again, you singled me out this time and make it all about me being incompetent and sensitive? Great. Smh.
You seem bitter and kind of jealous, and I am assuming that is why you keep doing this. As you said, you see some similarities, if we were totally different (and I didn't have such a voice on this forum) you most likely wouldn't really care.
Oh well.
all fun and laughters until someone loses an eye