fuckbucket

[Sol]

Maybe someday, I will step out of the shadows of internet anonymity and bare my face and soul for public scrutiny.

You may leave your anonymity with you. Only your video is needed for typing, not your name or any personal data.
It's same like you talk with people on a street. 10 min of your talk about rather general things -> some resonable probability to type you. No video = no resonable probability to type you. No resonable probability to type you -> senseless loss of time on this forum.

[Cop]

I would recommend playing them in order of release, it is more interesting that way IMO and is how Hideo Kojima intended it to be. Plus the controls evolve with each game and it would be awkward going backwards then forward again with them.

Hmm, noted. Either way I would be proceeding with the first title.

The cameras and controls in Snake Eater were beyond retarded and a great source of frustration, so it's difficult to imagine how the prequels could be worse in this regard. The corridor style levels of Sons of Liberty seem way more suited for the controls and forced perspectives than the large open jungle areas of its sequel, for which a streamlined camera á la Splinter Cell would've been an enormous improvement. The number of fuckups because I couldn't see more than 15 feet ahead of me caused innumerable rage quits.

You may leave your anonymity with you. Only your video is needed for typing, not your name or any personal data.
It's same like you talk with people on a street. 10 min of your talk about rather general things -> some resonable probability to type you. No video = no resonable probability to type you. No resonable probability to type you -> senseless loss of time on this forum.

You seem to be operating under a a few strange assumptions, namely that one can't correctly self-type and has to rely on others for a true type assessment, and that learning the theory is useless before you know your type. Is this correct?

[Myst]

You seem to be operating under a a few strange assumptions, namely that one can't correctly self-type and has to rely on others for a true type assessment, and that learning the theory is useless before you know your type. Is this correct?

"Strange" is quite an euphemism here

[Cop]

"Strange" is quite an euphemism here

I give him the benefit of the doubt before I start to use more colorful and correct descriptors, like "retarded" and "laughable".

[Cop]

Hi there

HELLO.