The discrepancy between Phaedrus' oppinion and that of the community seems mainly due to Phaedrus' (possibly justified) unwillingness to acknowledge 'organic causality', eg. the phenomenom that no matter how hard one screams what the 'proper' way of handling a system like the MBTI is, people will treat it the way they have for as long as they remember, and will evaluate statements made about the system in accordance with this.

'organic causality' seems to me a broad catagorization all the mechanisms driving the Fe function. After all, what is social evaluation of emotion really? "If I say X, person Y will react in way Z." Conversely, Ti, the function of structural (or should we say, inductive?) causality, runs paralel to it, orienting by it entirely...