Originally Posted by
thehotelambush
I subscribe to both of these views, and see no conflict between them. You can construe something as content on one level, or form on another.
In theory, or in general, there is no conflict. But in the specific application I have in mind in Socionics, there is. It's why, for example, Joy (who seems to be an advocate for the contentist position) will say a person is one type, whereas a structuralist will disagree and say that the person is a different type. It's basically why most of the disagreements in, say, the video thread and other threads on the forum occur.
Reply With Quote