Your own socionic model

[machintruc]

I go for model A, paying attention to quadra values as Joy mentioned and even model X, and also to temperaments. Smilingeyes's model is useful although I don't agree with all of it. To define temperaments, I go for my own interpretation of static/dynamic + rational/irrational = temperament.

Highlighting quadra values is not that useful. Quadras are only the groups of maximal psychological confort.

[machintruc]

I go for model A, paying attention to quadra values as Joy mentioned and even model X, and also to temperaments. Smilingeyes's model is useful although I don't agree with all of it. To define temperaments, I go for my own interpretation of static/dynamic + rational/irrational = temperament.

Highlighting quadra values is not that useful. Quadras are only the groups of maximal psychological confort.

[Expat]

Highlighting quadra values is not that useful. Quadras are only the groups of maximal psychological confort.

On the contrary, I think quadras are essential to understanding anything about Socionics. They explain why they are the groups of maximal comfort. That's not due to chance.

[Expat]

Highlighting quadra values is not that useful. Quadras are only the groups of maximal psychological confort.

On the contrary, I think quadras are essential to understanding anything about Socionics. They explain why they are the groups of maximal comfort. That's not due to chance.

[Exodus]

Smilingeyes's model is useful although I don't agree with all of it.

What parts don't you agree with?

[Exodus]

Smilingeyes's model is useful although I don't agree with all of it.

What parts don't you agree with?

[machintruc]

This is an hypothetical model, somehow based on a Reinin's representation of Model A :

http://www.socioniko.net/ru/articles/aug-priz/6.gif

I did this hypothetic model, which doesn't really resemble Model B :


01 - 02 + 03 - 04 +
08 + 07 - 06 + 05 -
12 + 11 - 10 + 09 -
13 - 14 + 15 - 16 +


block 01-02 is the program block
block 03-04 is the contact block
block 05-06 is the basic block
block 07-08 is the inert block

[machintruc]

This is an hypothetical model, somehow based on a Reinin's representation of Model A :

http://www.socioniko.net/ru/articles/aug-priz/6.gif

I did this hypothetic model, which doesn't really resemble Model B :


01 - 02 + 03 - 04 +
08 + 07 - 06 + 05 -
12 + 11 - 10 + 09 -
13 - 14 + 15 - 16 +


block 01-02 is the program block
block 03-04 is the contact block
block 05-06 is the basic block
block 07-08 is the inert block

[tcaudilllg]

This is an hypothetical model, somehow based on a Reinin's representation of Model A :

http://www.socioniko.net/ru/articles/aug-priz/6.gif

I did this hypothetic model, which doesn't really resemble Model B :


01 - 02 + 03 - 04 +
08 + 07 - 06 + 05 -
12 + 11 - 10 + 09 -
13 - 14 + 15 - 16 +


block 01-02 is the program block
block 03-04 is the contact block
block 05-06 is the basic block
block 07-08 is the inert block

...Do you resemble Thomas Jefferson?

[machintruc]

This is an hypothetical model, somehow based on a Reinin's representation of Model A :

http://www.socioniko.net/ru/articles/aug-priz/6.gif

I did this hypothetic model, which doesn't really resemble Model B :


01 - 02 + 03 - 04 +
08 + 07 - 06 + 05 -
12 + 11 - 10 + 09 -
13 - 14 + 15 - 16 +


block 01-02 is the program block
block 03-04 is the contact block
block 05-06 is the basic block
block 07-08 is the inert block

...Do you resemble Thomas Jefferson?

off topic