Beyonce Knowles

[Suz]

I watched her performances and her interviews and she pumps so much energy into the crowd and everything while perfoming

This is Fe, my friend.

[Moonbeaux Rainfox]

This is Fe, my friend.

SEE have Fe demonstrative, so they can be pretty strong in it.

It could also be high Se.

With Fe it will put her either in Beta or in Alpha.

I suppose people want to go with ESE or ISFp for her?

So Jay Z is LIE and they are Conflictors or Super Ego?

As ESE or SEI you will have her as Caregiver type.

I mean I went with Aggressor, bc content like in 'all the single ladies' etc.

[Suz]

SEE have Fe demonstrative, so they can be pretty strong in it.

oh, i dont disagree with that possibility.

I'm just making the point that what you described there quoted in my last post was Fe, not Te or whatever else you were implying it was.

I really dont know what type she is, but I am curious.

[Moonbeaux Rainfox]

oh, i dont disagree with that possibility.

I'm just making the point that what you described there quoted in my last post was Fe, not Te or whatever else you were implying it was.

I really dont know what type she is, but I am curious.

Ok. Then thanks for clearing that up. I wrote that with having high Se in my mind and then I went with .... I also think she has high Te. I mean when you don't exclude an ESI typing, you have to account somehow for this higher focus, hence ESI - Se.

Going with SEE - Fi you might account for higher focus on Ni (which I think she is maybe also not bad at). I consider landing with 2 Mirror types not as the worst outcome for an argumentation, because they still have high focus on the same functions and maybe 'less' focus on others.

Also to clear the other thing up. I type Olivier Rousteing as ESI (and saw SEE as the other possibilty) and he took over Balmain, when he was still pretty young, so I don't think 'weak' Te means less drive or sth. like that. I didn't intend it to come across that way.

Re. Alpha SF (I mean I have seen these typings,too), but I personally just cannot argument for it.