Results 1 to 40 of 3214

Thread: Socionics Beta types Examples

Hybrid View

  1. 05-22-2024, 09:41 PM #1
    nifl
    nifl is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    1,480
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikite iru View Post


    reminds me a lot of Ben Shapiro
    from beta maybe EIE
    does not remind me of Ben Shapiro. this guy is emotional
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-23-2024, 03:40 AM #2
    Still Alive
    Still Alive is online now
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,947
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nifl View Post
    from beta maybe EIE
    does not remind me of Ben Shapiro. this guy is emotional
    It's the way he talks, tonality, facial expressions.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 05-23-2024, 04:39 AM #3
    godslave
    godslave is online now
    Hakuna Matata and the cycle of Samsara godslave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Southern France
    TIM
    694 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,004
    Mentioned
    165 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikite iru View Post
    It's the way he talks, tonality, facial expressions.
    The timber of his voice is indeed a bit similar to that of Shapiro but his prosody is different, more specifically his speech tempo / elocution speed is slower.

    As for his Type, he an Si valuer. Based on my analysis of this video alone I would say Delta>Alpha and IEE>EII but I need more data.

    He's probably fearful avoidant 6-is. There is a lot of Fear expressed in that video.
    Lack is the Muse of all Poets
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 05-23-2024, 04:42 AM #4
    Still Alive
    Still Alive is online now
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,947
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by godslave View Post
    The timber of his voice is indeed a bit similar to that of Shapiro but his prosody is different, more specifically his speech tempo / elocution speed is slower.

    As for his Type, he an Si valuer. Based on my analysis of this video alone I would say Delta>Alpha and IEE>EII but I need more data.

    He's probably fearful avoidant 6-is. There is a lot of Fear expressed in that video.
    At least from my point of view, most of his videos revolve around him speaking perfect, fluent chinese as a westerner, which fits to my description of Ni as theoretical perfectionism.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules