This is the sort of vagary I have come to disdain within the Socionics system. You may hear one thing about a sort of type within one instance, yet here the exact inverse of the what was previously mentioned. This sort of fluidity and lack of structure in the system is is derrogatory to the objectivity of the system and further research done upon it. Pyschology that has not been tested and verified multiple times tends to have a sort of entropy affect on the research, pulling it farther and farther away from reality. Justification of such nonsense is apprehensible and should not be tolerated to no degree.