Previously I had considered SLE for William and LIE for Harry, but then later, I couldn't for the life of me think why I had done that...it almost felt like I had got them mixed up.
Regardless, your suggestion seems like a good one. I don't know a lot about it him apart from that he seems like quite a careful, shy, sort of person (and not really like Harry).
Yeah very true--the little bit i know about Harry, he's the one who strikes me as SLE. Definitely a merry type (Harry I mean).Originally Posted by Subterranean
Prince William has always been more of a serious type even when younger, imo.
my understanding of socionics has evolved quite a bit as well (and is still evolving!) since i started. Probably true for you as well.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
x
Prince William: LIE Ni
Kate Middleton: ESI Se
They are duals, IMO
Prince Harry: SLE Ti
Sarah Ferguson: SEE
Diana: IEI
Prince Charles: LII
Camilla: ESE
Queen Elizabeth II: ESI
Prince Phillip: LIE
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Prince William - Si-ESTj
Kate Middleton - Ne-INFj
They also seem more Delta to me, as compared to Gamma.
How so?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Just watched a documentary on William and Kate's love story. I'm convinced they are LIE/ESI. Their brief break-up was handled in a very Fi sort of way, especially by Kate. And she is DEFINITELY a sensor.
Oh yeah, and I agree on Princess Diana having been an Fe-valuer.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Do you have a link to this documentary? Is it on Netflix, by chance?
I think my Mom and Dad are ESI and LIE, so seeing this documentary you speak of might help me confirm (or ultimately) reject the typing of my parents.
My life's work (haha):
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
Input, PLEASEAnd thank you
They don't seem Se/Ni to me?
Yup.
Also, your standard tickle-me-elmo Se-PoLR pose:
Reminds one of April.
Based on the highlighted portion above, it reminds me of what Delta STs would be interested in as well. ESTjs (especially Si-ESTjs) are generally not stiff and "prudish", contrary to what most would think. If so, INFjs would probably not have been their dual.Lol, your earlier response was douchier. Good edit.
That's not the only reason for my typing, obviously. I'm generally a cautious typer and rarely get to a solid typing of someone famous, but this is an exception. I was referring to the entire pattern of behaviour, not just the Nazi stuff, although that particular brand of acting up is rather SLE-ish. His choice of jackarooing for his gap year, the Arctic charity trek, insisting on going into Iraq, partyboy reputation, love of off-road motorbiking, etc. Also he looks exactly like my SLE boyfriend around the eyes in practically every photo, and his bearing reminds me of some other SLEs I know.
What do you mean by "stiff" and "prudish"?
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
except for Sarah, who I'm not sure about and Philip who I think is more ILIish, and possibly SEI for Diana but Fe creative at the very least
btw, I was watching the recent interview of Kate and William on Yahoo news and it seemed strikingly obvious to me that Kate is the more dominant one of the two
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
