Originally Posted by
Jonathan
But is there anything in the type 1 that's inconsistent with being SEE? I certainly recognize SEE there, although the last bullet point doesn't seem to fit as well as the others (lots of types could be creative designers.) I bring this up because I know that often in Socionics SEE is described in more aggressive (even 'pushy') terms, and it may be interesting discussion whether that's really so (in which case many people who seem SEE would then have to be SEI, and then you have two very different types of SEIs).
Anyhow, among real people I know, I think this type 1 description fits very well.