Quote Originally Posted by Gilligan
It's useless to consider the types themselves outside the context of those to whom they apply. I think there is a distinction, even between two comparatives of the accepting subtype or look-a-likes of the producing subtype, but only theoretically; I observe people changing within the lines of type easily enough that at some point it became utterly useless for me to really think of individuals as one type or the other. I think that people usually are, at any given point, on one side or the other of the line distinguishing two types, but people as entities can't be confined to one type, IMO; there's really only a "baseline," the type in which a person spends most of his or her time, which would be the one her or she identifies with the most.
completely agree

i think the easy to identify types are:

EP-Ti EP-Ne EP-Se EP-Fi

IJ-Ti IJ-Se IJ-Ne IJ-Fi

son on