Originally Posted by
idiot
I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.
If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.
Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
. I personally think that you can confuse mirror types and quasi-identicals for example, because those types share quite a lot of similarities, but if you claim you are this objective person with years of experience with socionics and you can't even differentiate vulnerable Fi from base Fi, that's really saying something.
Reply With Quote
