why?
why?
When the person just tells random things and is not concerned about identity in group. EII normlaizer seem quite harsh, joyless and stoic caring about the common day. I'm trying to wrap my head around why they consider it to be the best thing.Originally Posted by soundofconfusion
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Fi types are the least harsh as prefer to be emotionally pleasant
instead of using bs heresies to rationalize mistakes is better to type more correctly to fit the theory
> joyless
does not relate to Jung types. T-types are lesser emotional on surface and I-types are lesser open
Bjork is Fe
Rachel (Rachel & Jun's Adventures!) - IEI
some P-I, most for SLI
plain wrong -- Fi is personal ethics. maybe EII is less harsh due to their "airy" quality, but ESI is definitely harsh. Fi doms are Fe ignoring
Marina Novichkova - ENFP
link2
Fi is emotional comfort which relates to personal ethics. just think
to re-read basics of the theory will be also useful. and look at my types examples to better understand what you read
plain wrong is for noobs to argue with me. especially ones who read random English texts instead of normal books and such got a strange mess in their heads
Last edited by Sol; 09-10-2019 at 08:08 PM.
Emotional comfort?where are you even getting this? Fi isn't emotional comfort, in fact that's strictly a FeSi thing, Fi is energy relations and distance, personal ethics and a judging function. look at what im doing now: you are stepping on my Fi+Te belief, so I'm disregarding comfort in order to prove my point. it has nothing to do with comfort. just think
@voider
also. to understand the theory better is important to understand correctly own type. this will reduce mistakes and so wishes to rationalize them. I recommend you to make a typing theme with a videointerview
You guys made the blue haired girl take her videos down. I would too if someone posted mine on a site that seemed weird. I would feel stalked. Maybe she doesn't know English which would be creepier.
At least youtube/google let's you track it.
Plenty of deltas have piercings, tattoos, unnatural colored hair, etc. I know many IEE who dye their hair with a rainbow of color.
I am not sure what kind of sheltered life someone needs to live in to not notice. I know sol is not in Siberia so he recognized it is possible.I only looked for a few seconds at her video when it was posted but since she wasn't speaking English I didn't get much of an impression on type.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I think it's very likely actually. I initially thought she was a bit famous but when you google her channel name one of the first results that comes up is this thread. it's a reason why I don't like to type bloggers.You guys made the blue haired girl take her videos down. I would too if someone posted mine on a site that seemed weird. I would feel stalked. Maybe she doesn't know English which would be creepier.
At least youtube/google let's you track it.
Plenty of deltas have piercings, tattoos, unnatural colored hair, etc. I know many IEE who dye their hair with a rainbow of color.
I am not sure what kind of sheltered life someone needs to live in to not notice. I know sol is not in Siberia so he recognized it is possible.
Would be strange to scary a many years popular blogger by psychology site.
> Maybe she doesn't know English which would be creepier.
She knows basic English as should all educated Russians.
> Plenty of deltas have piercings, tattoos, unnatural colored hair, etc.
> I know sol is not in Siberia so he recognized it is possible.
types give a tendency in a behavior, but not strict limitations. there a variacy by different factors. so a behavior not common for types and values is possible, but the more of it and higher degree - the lesser possible it is and more rarely is met
that EII has a ring in the nose. to more rings in the face - the lesser possible that would be EII
I miss Siberian snowy forrests with bears and no men in 100 km radius (as all were eaten by bears)
> I only looked for a few seconds at her video when it was posted but since she wasn't speaking English I didn't get much of an impression on type
use your VI force
why would an EII care about a group identity with Fi as base? normalisers are more grounded in reality that's true, but their creative endeavours can be quite complex. the difference between creative subtypes is that creatives don't fear scandals when it comes to their interests, while normalisers are more cautious. normalising subtypes experience more anxieties in everday life, that's why they stick to routines and order.When the person just tells random things and is not concerned about identity in group. EII normlaizer seem quite harsh, joyless and stoic caring about the common day. I'm trying to wrap my head around why they consider it to be the best thing.
Reply With Quote
