not sure. LIE is possibleOriginally Posted by necrosebud
not sure. LIE is possible
Okay. Why did you say N>S if you don’t mind me asking?
I think Emily is IEE.
Stephen Fry - ISTP
emilywking - mb ENFP
his non-verbalism/mannerisms/mimicry etc. reminds me more of intuition than sensing
agree on Delta NF for emilykwing
EII
https://linktr.ee/tehhnicus
Jesus is King stops black magic and closes portals
self diagnosed ASD, ADHD, schizotypal/affective
Your face makes your brain and sociotype – how muscle use shapes personality
I want to care
if I was better I’d help you
if I was better you’d be better
Human Design 2/4 projector life path 1
SLI, Canadian subtype.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Anastasiya Shablinskaya - INFJ
N type
Gibi ASMR - IEE
Last edited by nifl; 04-27-2023 at 10:49 AM.
Benedetta Porcaroli - mb ENFP
Last edited by Sol; 04-29-2023 at 01:13 PM.
maybe IEE
seems too ditzy for logic or rationality. no 'dangerous' intertype feelings which i sometimes get with EIE/IEI
Last edited by nifl; 04-11-2023 at 09:08 AM.
I have a question about that , how do you make sure your impressions are accurate ?
Souls know their way back home
the more i watch a person, the higher the possibility is for a sure impression. if they give ostensibly not-contradictory type-related mannerismic/non-verbal impressions and thus intertypical feelings, then the chance of being sure in my impression is obviously also higher. if there's enough other and quality data which coincides with the primarily non-verbal typing, then that's additional support. this support is rarely more than secondary, as celebrities rarely can be accurately understood adequately from what they say or what is said about them; it's either selective or even can be false information a lot of times.
even if there's no 'possibly/maybe', etc. it's possible for me to change my typing - including those which i fancied as secure initially -, with or without additional data; being a sensory-logical means that these intuitive and emotional impressions are averagely weaker, more muddled, less secure, more easily influenced which can then lead to a change in opinions about a person. these types need more intense practice to get securer impressions here. when a higher rate of secure impressions is gotten, then my opinions will change less.
He should to have same basis as me.
Same check as with any method can be used with intuitive-nonverbal method.
By fiting facts to supposed types, by a match of results with other methods and different data (common behavior, abbilities, relations, tests), by independent match with other typers.
For example, for well-known people there is much of data about common behavior. You may check how types supposed by impressions fit to types which could be supposed by common behavior. If the match of methods is good and it's regular situation - skills in the method are good and the method works. The more of different data matches to theory - the more trust to a method by which types were supposed.
In case of IR effects, which is main Socionics hypothesis. It's understood and checked by experience of factual impressions from people which types were supposed by different data. 1st of all - for good known irl people. This needs correct own type and correct types of other people to understand IR theory and what impressions IR inspire.
As with any today method there exist significant speculativity. Skills are improving step by step after a time to achieve better match of known facts and impressions related to type traits.
There were experiments with typing matches on socioforum. When were used only questionnaires (hence for logical analysis), - average match they got not significantly better, seems even worse than in my experiment where people used intuitive impressions. So for a typing both T and N are useful. Jung types traits are seen in nonverbal not badly as average match 17-20% from random videos, - it's far more than accidental (~6%) - and that was got by random people without special training in intuitive nonverbal method.
Last edited by Sol; 04-11-2023 at 11:19 AM.
The legendary Delta manga/anime Doraemon:
Doraemon: IEE/ESE
Nobita: EII/IEE
Nobita’s mom: LSE
Nobita’s dad: EII
Suneo: EIE
Gian: SLE
Shizuka (Nobita’s crush): SLI
Last edited by Renna; 04-13-2023 at 12:16 PM.
Tatjana Navka - EII, IEE
Marla Sokoloff - EII
Mena Suvari - IEE
Julia Goldani Telles - IEE
Last edited by nifl; 04-13-2023 at 06:46 PM.
Marla - maybe ESI, IEI
Se valuing
Tatyana Navka - mb INFP
Julia Goldani Telles - ENFP
Marla Sokoloff - not EII
Shannon Curry - ENFP
Nina (Rational Typology) - INFJ
Last edited by Sol; 04-24-2023 at 10:39 AM.
Marion LMJM - ENFP
She looks INFp
"Precision beats power and timing beats speed"
My favorite EII David Gilmore. I think Roger Waters is beta.
Roger Waters - mb INFJ
while David Gilmore - not mb
kallmekris - can be ENFP. looks cute
Aokiji SLI
Ice queen
Valentina Teresjkova on the other hand, looks more like a ST
Yuriy Gagarin - mb INFJ
I thought IEI for him, what is not a rare opinion.
Recently had watched his video interviews and have inclined to EII now.
(The idea of delta being 1st in space I like more, anyway
His mimics reminds me Coulthard, who I think as EII
also extravert, maybe.
Last edited by nifl; 05-05-2023 at 10:40 AM.
Gabby's Channel - ENFP
Conan O'Brien IEE
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
may be. some extraverted intuitive, at least
Conan O'Brien reminds Jack Oliver Aaron (ENFP)
Resident Evil 0: not very sure but Billy could be SLI and Rebecca could be IEE Fi/ ESI?
EII
Yes, Jack Oliver Aaron VI's like Conan O'Brien who btw wrote episodes for the Simpsons. IEI
Too many beta types on this page, meh
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
Natasha O'Keeffe - ENFJ
flowers near @Alive - IEI
the primal fear of Socionics: to fall for a cute ''dual/activator'' only for the tale to end in misery finding out it's a conflictor/superego after much not understood pain
Neha Sehgal (Binyamin Tsadik) - mb ENFP
This is among reasons why it's useful to know a human better and to become good friends before making a pair.
There are examples of good pairs and even good IR pairs when both had mistakes in own types. Those people communicated a lot and for long before making a pair and so _factually_ understood how good they feel and cooperate together.
Also, as other traits besides Jung types influence and hence anyway you need _general_ evaluation how good both feel together in establishing friendship relations.
It's harder to mistake in a type when you'll get so much info, after monthes of friendly communications. With lesser info - rather possibly to mistake in a type and in general fiting to each other.
Last edited by Sol; 05-09-2023 at 04:52 PM.
Emily Haines - IEE
"Precision beats power and timing beats speed"
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LTYIXLvBwQI
SLI female spotted.
"Precision beats power and timing beats speed"
Reply With Quote
