That guy actually looks a lot like @Sol.
That guy actually looks a lot like @Sol.
that's the bad stereotype of a SLE
Ethnically he's not very far (check grandfather's brother). But also there is significant effect of the similarity in nonverbal due to same or close types. People higher remind others, in general. This impression may mix with the perception of the appearance.
Nah, that guy isn’t SLE. As @timber said, he’s too square-cut Boy Scout.
The guy in that picture will drive his truck into the wilderness and will have prepared for everything, whether it be fishing or cutting down trees, and will return and say “Good evenin’, ma’am” to the ladies at the church house.
An SLE would look both more dashing and less neat. Se vs. Si.
Last edited by Adam Strange; 06-16-2019 at 07:10 PM.
I'm not convinced
well that's a pic before the safari in the Danube, ofc he's clean and neat, also it's a stocking photo lol
and he doesn't look at all like he'd say "good evening, ma'am" to me, he looks more like he'd grumble smth or just keep it shut, whereas, I agree, LSEs are polite cute things.
SLI 9w1? I love J Mascis, but he needs to CHILL
Activation Vibration - INFJ
Girl - IEE?
Guy - EII?
Jim Caviezel - EII
the coach lady at 55:30 seems SLI
Rupi Kaur - possibly Delta NF? or EIE?
Rupi Kaur SEI
Possibly.
Rupi Kaur - mb IL*
ASMR Hranitel - mb INFJ
IEE
guy in blue shirt: EII
Activation Vibration, SEI.
Last edited by Faith; 07-10-2019 at 08:44 PM.
haha she makes me laugh, she reminds me of this girl:
Girl to the left of the guy in the start - IEE
I usually notice, forgive me.
VI is still phenotypical traits, no? It only helps us to see an inductive correlation - these specific cognitive elements result in this expression etc. This does not mean that there cannot be deviations from this principle, that people cannot 'feel' like different types. After all, what really matters must be the cognitive elements, not the appearance of these?
VI which I use is about behavior dependent from a type.
> It only helps us to see
It allows to identify correctly Jung types and is the most appropriate for typing as main method for people which you don't know good IRL or without specific typing methods alike test/questionnaire/interview.
Having good typing skills mb checked good correlation of VI with a behavior and your IR effects with the types gotten by VI before.
Before you'll positively check own type by IR it's early for you to be assured in own typing skills. Study to type people near you IRL and only then type famouses as it's significantly harder.
Note: You got SLI by VI and then got not bad fiting of your IR test results to SLI. That IR test is created mostly by VI too. And when you did the test you used VI. So "bad" VI was concretely for you.