In less than 30 seconds of this - definitely
NOT INFj.
Wow, it all makes sense now. You are at it with @
Maritsa ALL the time, constantly grating on her that she is not EII (and she is). Yet your "Systematicaly typing" posts have merit. So how is it you get Maritsa's type wrong? The answer to that is not that you are a bad typist - you are just an
imperfect typist - just like the vast majority of the rest of us here, and you, Sol, have the EIIs very much mistyped in your mind - Hannah Blair here is a perfect example. You are absolutely right that Maritsa is not like this Hannah. If you have her in mind for EII then you have a misidentification of EII stuck in your mind, and that is why you stumble on this type.
Admit it. You are imperfect, and you can possibly have some misconceptions of some types in your mind. You do have some missing areas of knowledge concerning the details of the ways of the personalities of some types. You actually can stumble in typing people. You know some types well, and other types NOT so well. I can see for sure you don't know EII, and I do not think you know IEE well, either, which I will comment more on below. And if you think Hannah Blair is your dual, then you are definitely no LSE! (And I have been puzzled that you do not seem to be LSE - which I think you I have seen you claim yourself to be - but maybe you don't really know because its not in your avatar-info. So you should definitely look at the other types your are considering yourself to be. I have never seen LSE traits come through in you in any of your posts here myself.
From a Dostoyevsky article on this forum: EII =
"Quiet, affable, even gentle" - gentle and quiet - that's NOT Hannah. She has lovely cheekbones, lovely eyes, but not the INFj kind of those (i.e., her chin is feminine, but not elegant) She is girly but not the INFj kind of girly. INFj is
"tactful, modest, and even a bit shy". Where is modest and
shy with Hannah? Hannah is confident and self-possessed, not bashful or retiring. EII is
"unobtrusive, sensitive, yet determined and stoic". STOIC. Hannah Blair is NOT STOIC. Not a hint of that. Also, Hannah is all smiles and charm - EII has a lovely smile does does not smile without a specific reason to smile - though when she does she will break into a lovely sincere one. I would not label Hannah "sensitive" in this short. Nice, yes, but not "sensitive". Do you listen to this video and feel protective, like you want to keep people from hurting her feelings? I think not. EII is sensitive. Maritsa gets harassed by you, and her sensitivity to it is obvious every time you are on her. She doesn't like it. It stings, and she lashes back.
Continuing from Dostoyevsky:
"These are quiet, assiduous girls, who do not argue with the teachers. Even if they receive an unfair grade, they do not protest, but explain such situations to themselves somehow so that the authority of teacher does not suffer." Hannah is a school girl. Does she look "quiet and assiduous*"?? If Hannah gets an unfair grade, will she hesitate to (charmingly) protest it? I get from her the kind of self assurance that will go ahead and do that, if its a matter of concern to her. I do not think Hannah would be sensitively concerned that questioning her unfair grade would undermine the teacher's authority. I think she woudl just say her piece.
" In the class this girl, as a rule, has a few best friends, with whom she stands during breaks near a wall and with a quiet voice and with merit she discusses all the events of school life." She stands against the wall and quietly talks to her freinds. I do not think this video gives you that vibe.
Hannahis a school girl so this should fit if she is EII: "They excel at examining the events and troubles of the personal lives of the characters in literary works, which they have studied according to the class outline, and write some of the best essays in the class. Moreover, they read a lot outside of the assignments, write verses and prose, as a result of which their inner world becomes strongly romanticized. They are, in fact, some of the most dreamy girls in the class."
This doesn't sound like Hannah.
I could go on but you need to read Dostoyevsky and the other EII descriptions. You cannot stop at V I because VI is not enough. Even if you are good at it. The unformed wrong ideas in your mind about some types you are not ill-informed on will color your VI'ing. Like it did here.
And you are also not understanding the mind of an IEE, from your other posts in this thread: Bahar Takhtehchian is a Fashion Consultant and competent TV personality, and not ENFp, the Psychologist ENFp. ENFp is concerned with the inner workings of people - not the outer workings. I expect that Bahar is xSxJ. That Katie Moran that you say here cannot be ENFp, talking about "Quiet Borderline"? Wow, she sounds just like a psychologist. Oh, wait, isn't that what they call ENFp? Yes. I related very strongly to Kati's talk on that video, to her way of thinking very much, and I would NOT rule out ENFp for her.
So I am boldly urging you to read up on the personalities of EII and IEE - not just on the VI aspects - and also reconsider your own type. The reason why I am being so bold with you on that is because you are very bold about re-typing others. So since you dish it out, I assume you can take it. And you are probably not Delta. You relate to Hannah who is not Delta, and you have an aversion who is like ENFp, and you don't seem to take to Maritsa at all, showing her little if any respect, which is an abnormal, unlikely reaction to one's Dual (which you probably realize, and seeing this disconnect, rather than examine your understanding, you harass Maritsa.
)
_______________________
*Does the following describe Hannah? :
as·sid·u·ous
əˈsijo͞oəs/
adjective
showing great care and perseverance.
synonyms:
diligent, careful, meticulous, thorough, sedulous, attentive, conscientious, punctilious, painstaking, rigorous, particular; persevering
Originally Posted by universe
Bloggers and actors lists have them.
Reply With Quote
- 
(as per tcaudilllg)
