Quote Originally Posted by Smilingeyes View Post
I would suggest only caring about the charts in this thread. The rest is very ... primitive. The descriptions I wrote here, I wrote when I was only beginning to grasp the types as they are and hence I wrote in a crude and in some cases, erroneous way. The basic idea was and remains solid but the individual descriptions are not good. I could not recreate the original IP material here even if I wanted to and I have tried to clarify the same issues better in other threads.

So, please enjoy and use the charts but think of the descriptions as evidence of my folly and proof that everyone needs to practise before they understand.

Thank you.
Alright, but even as a rough estimate I liked them..because they combined the dichotomies in description. I also like the way the functions move..the progression that is. I need to do more reading but it was just easier to get your idea of how they combine. It's a starting point from where otherwise would be a very difficult/time consuming thing to piece together.