Oh, God no.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
See, this is what I meant when I said you are forcing this too much. The only times you post on here anymore is to defend the belief that "all types are the same, always" which can't be true. BTW, I do think you try and force the belief that you are Ni in socionics by using MBTT definitions of Ti, when of course that doesn't make sense. And if we were talking about Jung, then he would probably say that your intutition was "archaic", and thus, not a dominant function. The best answer for your type, with everything you continue to post, is dominant Ti, which I don't think is impossible (or even uncommon) for people who relate to dominant Ti in MBTT.