Robert Solow
ENTj?ESTj?ESTp?
Amayrta Sen
ENFj? INFj?
Robert Solow
ENTj?ESTj?ESTp?
Amayrta Sen
ENFj? INFj?
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Robert Solow - 1. LIE, 2. LSE
Amartya Sen - Maybe an intuitive ethical (1. EII, 2. IEI), but I could also see ILE
http://images.google.com/images?hl=e...e=UTF-8&tab=wi
Thanks Rick. Probably a Te sub ENTj imho for Solow.
Nassim Taleb?
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Slavoj Zizek, famous European philosopher. ENTj as well.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Never heard of him. I'll read something.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Thanks electric, I also just read something. He sounds Ne-dominant to me.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I was thinking a possible ESFj if not ENTp, since he does have a strong preference for analysis and logical models.Originally Posted by FDG
ESFj is an available option, yeah. I'd also say that his fondness of Hegelism is not realistic and/or compatible with ENTj as a typing, imho. Although I must admit that I can easily understand him. I can also see ENFj as a possibility. I am reading and I enjoy his writing, even if sometimes it sounds whackOriginally Posted by electric
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
SOLOW ENTP.
Amayrta: INTP
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
ISTJ IMOOriginally Posted by FDG
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
INFJ IMO, quite sure for this.Originally Posted by Gilligan
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
BY the way, FDG, check this out, what do you think?
http://trance-speak.blogspot.com/200...-robert-j.html
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Impossible. He doesn't have an ounce of Ne polr; ever read his books?Originally Posted by Dioklecian
In any case, I'm not familar with all the people you have tried to type in your blog; I'll give my opinion on some of them.
Mundell: a very clear ENTj, especially after having seen and heard him talking live
Prescott: ISFj
Heckman: ISTj or ESTp
Akerlof: ENTp!!!!!(I <3 Akerlof btw)
Stigliz: ENFp (vomit @ him)
Myron Scholes/Robert Merton: ENTj/INTp mirror pair
Lucas: INTj
Markowitz/Sharpe: ENFj/ISTj
Haavelmo: ESTj
Modigliani: ESFj
Leontief: ENTj/ESTp
Tobin: INTx
Hicks/Arrow: ISTj/ENFj seems fair, but could also be ISFj/ENTj
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Nope.Originally Posted by FDG
Ne POLR seems to be here:Taleb calls himself a "skeptical empiricist", and believes that scientists, economists, historians, policymakers, businessmen, and financiers overestimate the value of rational explanations of past data, and underestimate the prevalence of unexplainable randomness in that data.
Taleb believes that most people ignore "black swans" because we are more comfortable seeing the world as something structured, ordinary, and comprehensible. Taleb calls this blindness the Platonic fallacy,
Clearly he is unable to piece together the pieces of the puzzle (Ne) and see the univers as a whole.
Compare his ideas to this:
Socionics function: black intuition - intuition - intuition of potentialities
potentiality of object - inherent possibilities, purpose, abilities, talents, structure, construction, diagram or internal map of object
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
By the way, I was a follower of Popper myself, until I read Lewis Carol's article that I posted in this forum. (Achilles and the turtle).
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
WHHAAT ALL TALEB TALKS ABOUT DURING HIS BOOKS IT'S HIS IDEAS!!! How can a Ne polr person be concentrated on his ideas?
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
You could be right about Mundell. I keep mixing ENTJs with ESFPs.Originally Posted by FDG
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Do you suggest that ISTJs and ISFJs have no ideas?Originally Posted by FDG
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
By the way, have another look at my post above, it seems from the timing (my last edit at 9:04, your post at 9:03, that you might have writen this post before i completed mine).Originally Posted by FDG
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
What type is he anyways, INTP? ISTP? :
Wife seems ENFJ
http://www.dailyspeculations.com/
http://www.dailyspeculations.com/vic/1_vic_index.html
I think that he is INFJ, or more likely ENTP, or INTP, most likely ENTP though
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
While I agree with the following, I don't see how that removes predictability:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nassim_TalebNarrative fallacy. Creating a story post-hoc so that an event will seem to have a cause.
Ludic fallacy. Believing that the structured randomness found in games resembles the unstructured randomness found in life. Taleb faults random walk models and other inspirations of modern probability theory for this inadequacy.
Statistical regress fallacy. Believing that the probability of future events is predictable by examining occurrences of past events
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.