Horribly Inaccurate Vultology Typings

[Braingel]

People whose vult types would be wrong by mbti and beebe (based on vuktology’s own database):


Miley Cyrus (mistyped enfp, is esfp)


Kurt cobain (mistyped estp, is infj)


River Phoenix (mistyped estp, is infj)


Michael Jackson (mistyped istp, is isfp)


Madonna (mistyped isfp, is estp)


Juan Sandoval (is isfj, mistyped intp)


Britney Spears (mistyped enfp, is esfp/j)


Albert Einstein (was once mistyped istj, is now mistyped enfp, is actually an intp).


Chris Martin (mistyped estp, is XNFP)


Liam Payne (is mistyped entp, is isfj)


John Beebe (mistyped isfj, is entp)


Antonia Dodge (mistyped estj, ks entp)


Hit-ler (mistyped estj, is some XNFJ)


Enya (mistyped isfp, is infj)


Taylor Swift (mistyped istp, is esfj)


Harry Styles (is enfj, mustyped as estp)


Ariana Grande (is ESFX, mistyped as an entp)


Elon Musk (is mistyped istp, is actually entj)


Donald Trump (is estp mistyped as entj)


Lana Del Rey (is infj mistyped isfp, but this isn’t as obvious)


John Lennon (is ENFP mistyped as esfp)

C.S. Joseph (is ENFJ/ENTJ mistyped as ESFJ)

Dario Nardi (some ENTP or something, mistyped as enfp)

Some other people are def mistyped but who idk well enough to type, like aurora, Anya Taylor, Mia Goth, and Tom York or whatever his name..

I get that vultology is supposed to be about expression, but if you assume this to actual cognition.. Then like, a great fucking deal of these typings are wrong

[Braingel]

If the expressions don’t correspond any to actual cognition and the essence of one’s psychological unfolding, then it’s absolutely useless to render someone a type relative to said expression.. Unless the expressions have do with transience in loops, shadows, etc, but then this would have expand of..

This is one of those things of Si lead being about subjective sensory interpretation.. Much as you see in Qaz, it can be completely of base from someone’s actual process.

[SacredKnowing]

@Braingel C. S. Lewis?

[The Reality Denialist]

Well, it is very clear that he does not even meet the basic premises of Jung. Counting and collecting data about everything seems to reduce type down to Te (valuing) as per Jung. So. I'd say ILI type seems rather obvious.