Not really into being typed, but I'm more interested in seeing the difference in different interperations in the different socionic systems.

Also show your process of thoughts and reasoning if you want.

Ex: SLE in classic socionics, LSI C by gulenko himself, SEE or LIE in modern socionics, so one. And yes this is one of the questionnaires I filled out.

Extroverted Logic
Te-A. What would you consider to be productive work? How would you measure this? What are some factors that may affect someone or something’s efficiency? Provide some examples.
Effective work is reaching an objective in a smooth manner, and fulfilling all criterias. The criteria often involve time and quality. Nothing should be done without a purpose, when pursuing a job, one must take all the necessary steps towards reaching said goal and keep a consistent pursuit towards that goal or all of your previous work would be for nothing. One’s own ability on being able to be efficient depends on their habits and inclinations, basically temperament, but as well as external factors that can very such as how loud your surroundings are can hinder you from producing a clean audio for a project, etc. Though dealing with other people while working is unpredictable especially when we have to have to take one another seriously otherwise ridiculous sentiments will prevent oneself from making any meaningful progress.
Te-B. Think of a time where you needed to complete a difficult task. How did you approach managing the workflow? Why? How can you tell apart logical and illogical workflows or methods of action?
In the pursuit of a difficult, is only reasonable to take a step back and it says the problem from a larger lens, all factors or changing parts and and possess a keen understanding of the workings of this situation, then one must experiment with practical options/solutions. Then the cons and the pros should be compared, properly evaluate the risk, then when the path is chosen, one would have to work diligently until they’ve reached that outline of that particular goal. When it comes to separating illogical and logical methods of action, one must calculate which option till one is hundred percent sure. If any roadblock, or undesirable disrupts to the workflow, then the solution is deemed to be nothing but useless. But also, the time effort between different types of workflows can be easily compared, therefore calculating the costs.


Te-C. How can someone make a set of rules or instructions easy to follow? When people aren’t properly following directions or procedures, how do you correct them? When should you?
Anyone can reduce the complexity of steps down to tolerable brief chunks that still maintain their presumed effectiveness, while conveying the instructions in its most simplistic or fundamentals, as well as presentation. There should be done when there is a critical issue of others reaching a particular objective or goal, otherwise instructions are not to be considered.
For example, let’s say you’re giving a huge workload, that the workload is something having to do with steepling a bunch of papers, and that situation I would group the papers together per pamphlet, all of them, then I would staple all of them when they are all organized, which tends to be around the 10 minutes less than the amount of time as skipping out the organization, but in a sense it’s tolerable.
Once when I had a group leader, which usually I tend to prefer to be the leader of a group project in school because they tend to not trust other peoples judgements based off of the performances, I’ve seen from them. So what I did is, I broke up the group again from their roles, pushed everyone to showcase their grades and pacific grades on past individual projects to accurately assessed who was good at what, then assigned them their corresponding role in the Perez and project, Every day I would look at my teammates progress, and if people had any issues, I would look at their problem and help them solve it by creating instructions, help them out with their load of work, but I will also help with their load of work if necessary. I don’t mind helping other people out, I actually preferably like it.
Te-D. What would you consider a normal level of activity? Is it always necessary to maintain this? Why or why not? How can you tell if someone is overexerting or underexerting themselves?
Not exerting the right level would go two different ways. As tasks are completed and rewards are rightfully given, the exertion, and the effort should be congruent with the value of the reward, Or when an individual is two static, to an active. To the extent where it could negatively impact their health or general physical state, this would be a considerable indicator of exertion.
A good example, or scenario, let’s say your teacher gives you a assignment to complete for the class time, however, it’s a workload, therefore you come up with a solution and look at what the primary issue is of the worksheet and what you have to do, but also look into if you could look to the Internet for answers if not be stuck to a textbook. But at the end of the class, the teacher decided to make it due tomorrow. And the case of overexertion, you could’ve saved yourself stress by taking your time rushing, if you didn’t answer that question properly, you would have to be revising the questions again if you had the philosophy of, it’s better to have something than nothing. If you we’re not productive, your ass would be saved, but you have more homework. If you were just active enough, you met the teachers expectations, and you didn’t tire yourself out or rush too much, or have any extra homework.
Te-E. Think of an activity you’re interested in which requires certain physical or mechanical skills. How would you differentiate a good and bad technique? What makes these techniques effective or ineffective? How aware of you of your own performance?
The sense of confidence, moving fluidly, in the sense, knowing what to do, comes naturally, is a huge indicator. Excellent teacher knows how to explain information detailedly in a clear manner, excellent martial artist knows how to control an assert against their opponent without breaking a sweat. It should be easy for you to spot the Potential and the ability to transform and change your intentions into vile action like it’s nothing, It should be very instinctual, like an impulse and keen sense of purpose and understanding the situation and combination and breaking down the issue, to them formulate a method or a plan. It’s pretty obvious when other people lack it, the very sense of direction on what to do for any situation, be it even specific, usually these people end up freaking out over high stress situation, or displaying any queues of being unable to understand what exactly they should be doing, creating a reaction of distress.
E ▶ Examples of activities to describe
Recreational interests: Martial Arts
Work skills: business operations, Labor like farming, specialist(carpentry, electrician)
Basic skills: fixing everyday things like outlets, cabinets, Cooking, etc.
Try to think of an activity where you can easily tell a layman and a master apart. Alternatively, an activity in which you have a lot of experience.
Extroverted Ethics
Fe-A. To what extent does someone’s emotional state affect a person’s being? How does your emotional state affect your everyday life? When does your true emotional state differ from what you express?
My true state tends to be a bit off from my expression sometimes, especially when it comes to emotions that I find that will only cost ridicule, such as sadness or any vulnerable emotion. However, my expression of irritability, or or whether if I’m in a good mood pare purely authentic. However, I have poor regulation over my mood, temper, and tend to rely on long periods of rest, or being around people who can affect and change my mood for the better.
The impact it has on individuals is direct, it affects how active they are in their relations. My emotional state mainly tends to be between being irritability and satisfaction, when I feel energised my capacity for work and willingness to spend time with others are good. However, when I’m irritable, My relationship with other people tends to crumble due to me losing my temper.
Fe-B. How important is it for someone to be inspired and excited about what they’re doing? Why? How can people actively inspire others?
Two distinct things, In terms of excellence, and so on, it requires all capacity and attitude to be congruent towards the pursuit of quality and respectable outcomes are results. Then there is the instinctual or survival part, That what you feel, and how you feel is still irrelevant to securing whatever is mandatory for security, and what you’re feeling, should be pushed to the side when partaking and important decisions that require critical thinking.
People may use deep, scent, or moving narratives to slowly manipulate any type of motion others, even inspirational. But dangers, threat and detriments and it’s opposition, benefits and rewards, can motivate an individual with ease.
Fe-C. What role do negative emotions, including anger, play in people’s lives? What causes them? Are they intrinsically valuable? Why or why not? What can be learned from negative emotions?
Emotions can be adaptive tools to help individuals pass through social and basic life, it’s what creates bonds and causes actions. It pushes large groups of people to act out in their emotions, primarily negative emotions like anger, Usually for exerting power or to create a larger impact. Emotions are caused by the stimulants of the external world, perhaps in lack of, However, these emotions are still subjective and non-tangible, Or not necessarily for functioning due to striving and taking actions that can be taken care of by other drives like dedication, discipline, in the sense of obligation that may be more indirect in terms of relation. Some work for others, emotions are still pretty much subjective.
Fe-D. In your view, what does it mean to be calm? How can someone reduce the amount of emotionality happening in others around them? When would it be appropriate to adjust this?
Calmness is the opposite of volatility, its a state of low emotional activation and response.
To satisfy their emotional impulses and temper all their emotional energy, it can be done in many ways, venting, excersise, reflection, sedation etc. it should be done when the individual is displaying emotions that are detrimental to themselves and others.
Bing calm is to be the opposite of angry, volatile, a state of low response. Satisfy emotional impulses, tempers, which can be done with method such as reflection, exercise, sedation, Suppression, etc. It should be done when someone is expressing any excessive emotion that is harmful towards oneself and others.
Fe-E. How can you tell how someone is feeling? Describe some signs to look for. What are some giveaways that someone’s internal state is different from what they’re expressing on the outside?
From how someone carries themselves to the tone of their very voice, if you know someone’s past, you have an easier time understanding their internal, emotional state, Especially if they are acting different than their usual selves, such as being more distant or the opposite, etc.
The only way to understand someone’s internal state is to know what could’ve possibly happen to them that would elicit such a internal state, Specially, if they’re acting off from their stereotypical self. However, personally, this is more of a struggle especially since most social cues fly over my head because of autism.
There are many things that I try to understand about this entire section, similar to the Fi section. however, I don’t necessarily feel any obligation to learn about it currently or at all.
Extroverted Sensing
Se-A. To what extent does an individual’s appearance and external presentation affect them? How aware are you of the way you come off? Should people always consider how they look? Why or why not?
I’m aware of how I come off to people by their demeanor, body language, and facial expressions. Generally people will dress to “self express” which is to really means their appearance will often reflect on whether or not they have self value, maybe in some sort of gang or have some sort of status for example(basic care, etc). It’s just better to represent yourself in a true manner. I’d say the people around me do tend to get tense due to my more heavy presence or presumed strictness, despite me not even being a strict person, but fairly volatile.
Se-B. Describe your view on money. What can it do for someone, and how does access to it affect people? What are your thoughts on riskier approaches to attaining it, such as risky investments or criminal activity?
Money is a very important thing, a tool even, and should be used for what it is meant to be used for. Basically money allows you to have more freedom, reach, opportunities to get your way, and the more money you have, he more leverage you generally will have over other people in a capitalist society without rules regulating monopolies. Many people see it as a weapon in all sorts of ways, some others think it can bring equality among people in terms of fair pricing. If one only care about end results, “ends justify means”, then of course taking risks is involved in the pursuit of money. However for some others, then it’s better to find a money making method that isn’t incompatible with your own set principles of moral and the values of your society.
Se-C. What would you consider your short and long term material goals? How do they compare to the goals of others? How can you tell if someone is striving for the right goals?
Short term material goals would give me the ability to spend money comfortably without having to compromise my basic lifestyle or needs. if an object catches my attention or focus, be a muscle car or something like an art piece, I want to own it and enjoy it without having to be broke. I’m pretty young, however currently I’m starting to have interest in an estates, cars, Art pieces, And I also want to build my own wealth, but also be able to help my family out when I do, a notable example is a desire to possibly pay for my brothers tuition fee when I get older. Generally, I can be driven by desire that are inherently impulsive, and I have a struggle to suppress them(ex: demanding fights, gambling(an old habit that was broken)), So securing my own independence and backups and guarantee that I won’t have others, have a saying how I live because of the independence I so desire. Nor do I want any dept, sounds like the worst thing, like a dumbass decision to even take any options that lead to such outcomes. For what I strive for long-term goals, To to affect any given event or situation to my advantage, and posed as a possible threat to any opposing or harmful intentions directed towards me or what I would stand for. Specifically, in terms of what I stand for, I mean politically. I find that other people want money to live a comfortable life, while due to my class and the unlikelihood of it, i’m most certainly want to change the political ideals, or any power dynamics of struggle or conflict, to my advantage. I want to push the people nearby me, hopefully even spread my own ideals to hopefully have people who take on a tough mindset and change the ridiculous softness of today’s society. However, I am unsure for what the future holds, and I am still in high school, therefore I might be getting ahead of myself.
Se-D. What makes a person or organization look “put-together”? Are these people and groups more able to exert their will over others? Why or why not? What makes a person good at organizing and directing the will of themselves and others?
A business or organisation will look put together when urgency, focus, is in a constant motion throughout its ranks, all working in tandem to accomplish a shared objective. The key is for leadership to effectively communicate priorities down the ranks in a structured manner, ensuring that each individual in the chain of command relays clear instructions to those below them. When this occurs, a sense of order and cohesion is maintained. Individuals will look put together when there is a purpose behind every action they take, to have a well thought out intention, a sense of direction and passion. Particular, individuals or groups with said qualities are those who tend to impact and produce change to mold their environment. This given the individual has a lack of restriction if none within their rights and the space they possess. To mold or influence the environment and the people within it, follow gut instincts and the very passions and drives you possess, be it because of the immediate moment, the volition of the pursuit, and others will intake it and fallow suit in your direction, your way. One must enforce their wishes in a undeniable manner to which people or individuals are infected with the obligation to carry on with the target/goal. This is all what happens when you just go with what you sense in your very instincts, it’s like a non-verbal language or way of communication.
Se-E. One famous English adage is that “If there is a will, there is a way.” Do you agree? Why or why not? To what extent an individual’s will affect their ability to accomplish their goals?
Will is volition. That volition is mandatory for reaching any goal. Ideas that can be executed in practice NEED raw volition to even take place, there’s not exactly any words to describe it, but volition and well is more than a factor more than a driver, it is the essential. Even in unfavourable situations, it alone can propel you to extreme heights, past yoru previous limitations, and push things towards your favour. When up against other people, it is the essential factor, however, it is above resources such as money or even connections. The persistent one who is strongly determined on being the winner will overpower their opponent, to out perform, out class, and this even can be applied in a physical context. That if both individuals engaging in a fight are within similar weight class, or etc, but of course, a little girl isn’t going to topple some 6’0 guy unless she had some gun.
Extroverted Intuition
Ne-A. What would you consider to be the essence – or meaning – of existence? Should life’s meaning be personal or collectively shared by humanity? Why?
The meaning of life, subjective, to abstract to get anywhere. That’s why I’ll go by whatever my religion believes the meaning of life is, which seems to be the Blind Faith towards God to live life with a sense of contempt. With my beliefs, majority of topics and discussions aren’t really too difficult to contemplate about, I think that’s because my beliefs generally satisfy the need for having at least some sort of perspective. I generally won’t analyse much or spend too much time thinking about it, as I still tend to prefer mental peace. Though from a collective meaning that are shared in our society, We all have to have some sense of meaning or else society will become divided over nonsense, creating weakness and loose bonds that makes the structure of society flimsy.
Ne-B. What makes someone have potential? What makes an individual more capable at something than others? When is it important to consider these capabilities? Can a person be truly hopeless? Why or why not?
Comes down to their willingness to take act, if someone is confident and themselves and it’s strongly determined, they can, and usually will achieve what they aim for, if they use the right strategies. The one’s competence, and our target. most important occasions and considering the potential abilities in critical times does take on competition, steady work ethic, and the constant pursuit of it. Hopelessness is in which state when one truly believes nothing can change.
Ne-C. What must an individual understand to physically and spiritually develop themselves? Is it more important to recognize the flaws or the strengths that people are given? Why?
People must develop the ability to view things from the outside prospect, a larger lens, so then they could judge themselves accurately to then choose their own path. The recognition of flaws is important because they can later on pose as a threat or a roadblock, well, one’s personal strengths only increase possible benefits. Once flaws are dulled to a stump, eliminated if not, Strength become much easier to strengthen and propel to then strive for higher targets.
Ne-D. How would you determine how good an idea is? Do these ideas need to be realistic to be worthwhile? How would you differentiate a promising opportunity from a dead end?
If the idea is sound, in the sense that it makes practical sense, then it can be put into action and produce benefit, therefore it is a well thought out idea. However, our ideas have to realistic, and not lacking in substance. to differentiate a promising idea from an idea that gets nowhere, if you follow through it through steps and reach a decent conclusion, to which you can determine by the desirability of those results.
Ne-E. What does it mean for someone to understand the “essence” of something? When should someone prioritize understanding the core characteristics of a phenomenon? Think of a topic or field of interest you are knowledgeable in. What do you think lies at the essence of it? What does this suggest about the way people should approach it?
Essence depends on context, for whatever reason in the angle of perspective you were viewing essence for. Through pragmatic lens, essence is the mechanism or workings of that idea, but from a deeper understanding, poetic, philosophical perspective the essence is the core of the very concept. From the soul perspective, it is the spiritual insight, the self reflect.
Overall, this section was one of the harder ones, I definitely say that I should improve my understanding of the potential, and meanings, however it’s easier to understand than concepts like love.
Introverted Logic
Ti-A. What would you understand as an individual’s basic needs? Are these the same for everyone? To what extent do people rely on others to get their needs met? At what points does this become overreliance or underreliance?
Basic needs or inherently objective, and, the very fundamental of survival. Regardless, humans are still mammals, and Mom mammals are still animals animals, To which we rely on the basic needs to make it alive every. From a societal structure, we each rely on each other to some extent in which it doesn’t necessarily pose a risk or a threat. How are in situations where you have to rely on another, it’s important to do so cautiously. Relying on anyone for too much becomes dependence, and creates a sense of dept to that person. Becoming not reliant enough happens when an individual’s needs are ignored due to extreme stubbornness to stray away from independence.
Ti-B. How do people gain leverage, power, and respect from others? Is it sometimes necessary to use threats, fear, and punishment to accomplish this? Why or why not?
Leverage can be gained over others by resources, force, power in numbers, fear factors, etc depending on what makes the target tick. Another way is studying how your opponent moves, their tactics, tendencies, rules, etc. There are many primal fears that can be taken advantage of. We still all have basic fears to keep us alive and win over things like territory, etc.
Ti-C. One commonly used idiom is that “Everything has its place.” What does this mean to you? How do things being “in their place” contribute to orderliness? Do you agree with the idiom? Why or why not?
Generally, the more organised you are, the more easily your skills, proficiency, or positioning can be exploited or taken, Structured and grounded, fundamental in approaching any issue or situation.
Well, I’ve took this example with some other people, but when I got into fights before that were for entertainment reasons, I was naturally inclined to try to watch every single fight so that I would study how my opponent future opponents naturally fight what methods and styles they use, and they’re overall predictability. So I realised that if someone were to have the same mindset as me, I too, could become predictable, therefore it’s better to be strategic, but unpredictable.
Ti-D. What makes hierarchies work? When are they appropriate to use, and what do they provide to people? Should they always strive for equality and justice? Why or why not?
Hierarchies are structured in an ample manner where the head gives orders to organize those beneath them. These hierarchies can be built on ideologies, or some sort of social adhesive that gives people an identity, in which when collective creates a sort of organism. Outsiders are seen as viruses in this sense. However this society needs everyone to display some respect for each other and a willingness to adhere to what is demanded of them to preserve that society. This also allows for entire groups to accomplish something larger than oneself, and pursue resources/territory, etc, which leads to competition against other groups.
Ti-E. What does it mean for something to be logical? Is this the norm? Provide an example of something logical and illogical, and compare what makes the first logical and the second not.
What is logical is when it conforms to laws or principles like cause, reasoning, And rememberable experiences. These traits are confirmed to be a logical conclusion, can easily be utilised because of its reliability. However, if something were to conflict with, Structured nature of mathematics, or conflict with general experience, truly has no realistic coherent reasoning and will inherently cause contradictions. Logical things fit into the world framework naturally, and usually can explain phenomena and be quickly incorporated to our own senses of the world, to which that information or knowledge can be utilised to our own advantage.
Introverted Ethics
Fi-A. What does it mean to be emotionally close to or distant from someone? In what ways can you adjust your “emotional distance” to someone else? For what reasons would you decide to do this?
I’m not really sure how to determine what makes you closer to someone, however, two emotionally distance yourself to someone I would presume is to cut contact and physically distance yourself from that person if they walked into a room. The only way to determine whether if someone’s close to me or not is really to look at my experience with them, however, I still find myself finding it impossible to change my attitude towards someone.
Fi-B. Share some thoughts on how you view love and desire. What makes a person desirable? Is this the norm? Are some people more deserving of these than others? Why or why not?
I don’t really know who deserves love or doesn't, I guess it’s a personal thing to decide. While I would say, love is not necessarily a need, statistically, it is an undeniable that love is needed for a stable life and stable mental health. I am still trying to research what healthy love should be. Even reading what love is by googles definition, is hard to understand as a concept.
Fi-C. Describe what morality means to you. What does it mean for something or someone to be good or bad? What does it take for something bad to become good? Are some things truly irredeemable? Why or why not?
I take a lot of my morals from religion, I find myself easily justifying deeds otherwise, the most basic form of morality is that if a deed is harmful to oneself and others pretty much, in a way that it doesn't lead to beneficial outcomes down the line like resilience or tolerance towards tough times(times of fitna), and a good deed is beneficial to oneself and others from what I’ve been told.
Fi-D. How are people shaped by their relationships with their friends and family? How do these differ from romantic ones? Are non-romantic relationships more important than romantic ones? Why or why not?
Non-romantic or family relationships don’t really matter or impact me, or even romantic relationships currently as a late teen. From things like marriage, family, friends who you keep around for networking, etc, both none and romantic relationships are very important in life for stability. I have nothing else to write about, I’m still very unexperienced.
Fi-E. What can establishing new relationships with people do for someone? Is making new contacts with others as important as deepening the ones people already have? Why or why not?
Establishing relationships is useful for things like networking, building insights into any industry you want to get ahead in, etc.
There has to be some limit to how deep and strong existing relations can be, past a certain point you become a doormat for the other person and become a shell of yourself.
It’s better to keep a contact list of relations and connections is convenient.
When it comes to becoming a shell of, from whatever observed from other people, is this constant pursuit of love to the point where people start to ignore the negative leverage that they’re giving themselves in reality. For example, a man spending all of his money on a woman because he’s a stupid simp, or a woman, staying with a man, who abuses or neglect her.
However, it’s also coming from prospective of seeing love as more of a luxury, and I’m not exactly sure how it’s decided who deserves to be loved, and who isn’t.
Introverted Sensing
Si-A. One of the key themes in the bestselling book Atomic Habits is that what people have in their surrounding environment is the greatest subconscious driver of how they live their life. Do you agree? Why or why not? How can changing the environment around someone impact the way they live their life?
It’s not as significant as that book emphasized, however it is a core factor/driver, environments mold and shape people as survival requires people to adapt to their surroundings, not the other way around, which is done to use their environment to their advantage in all contexts. Dangerous environments that demand constant awareness to properly navigate will cause the people in it to develop particular coping strategies/mechanisms to combat the very issues that may prevent them from succeeding, static or plentiful environments gives people the ability to tackle issues that are of a higher purpose as their basic needs are no longer an issue, acting towards the path of self realization.
Si-B. How should people approach managing their health and well-being? How does this compare to the way you approach your own? When should people be taking their health and well-being into account? Why?
People should control their health to the extent where it doesn’t negatively impact their objectives or the pursuit of their said desired lifestyle. However in reality from what I’ve seen, some people make it their first priority(almond moms) or neglect it completely for reasons like finishing up a work load than tenting to their physical health(accomplishments), or just out of plan laziness.
Si-C. Think about the way sensations, both good and bad, shape the way people live and experience their lives. How important are experiencing good sensations in one’s life? Is there a limit to how much one should chase these? What role do negative sensations play in our lives?
Sensations affect moods of individuals. So too much of a positive sensation causes an over dependence on it, it causes people to become numb and seek more of it, like a drug addict. However there isn’t anything wrong with it if done it moderation. Negative sensations will elicit distress in people, causing them to lose their sanity, however like positive, done in moderation can be used as a means of motivation and create and maintain a mental state that is essential for things like work. Positive sensations can be things like sleeping in a warm bed to doing hard drugs, negative sensations can be stubbing your toe to being jumped. A system of reward and deterents.
Si-D. Choose one of the following: art, clothing, photography, graphic design. What makes something well-designed in that area? How do the individual components work together to generate the experience?
For something to be well-designed, it gives an image of beauty, perfection, balance or conveys a style that is pleasing to the eye. Preferably, things that seem more tough or jagged, like edgy skulls or muscles cars. Obviously the point of design of a muscle car or t shirt is done t look attractive and have you at awe, that’s how you know it’s perfect.
Si-E. Describe what your living & working environments are like. How do they affect you? Would other people be similarly affected in the same environment? Why or why not? What changes could you make to improve it? How would these be beneficial?
My living and working environment is somewhat messy, however it’s not necessarily disorganised, and organized for practicality (tools at this section, etc).
Introverted Intuition
Ni-A. How do people’s relationship to the past, present, and future influence the way they currently live their lives? To what extent does this affect them? How does this influence your own life?
Sure, there are significant events in my life that push me towards the direction I’m heading today. In the end, your work ethic, how much you’re willing to impact the world, in general temperament is the main factor. As our past does change our future outlook, even affecting our own temperament, personality, and so.
Ni-B. What does it mean for a person to be at a certain “phase” of their life? What puts people into the phases they’re currently in? How does this affect the way people navigate their lives?
People are in phases due the way they deal with external factors, their adaptation to their current environment is what puts them in such phase, phases can affect big things in their life at that point in time such as decisions and choices.
Where are life we deal with multiple phases, these phases may be due to the external environment pushing us to adapt to changing external factors, However, we may still carry on these traits throughout our lifetime and it may affect our future decisions. A good example of this is trauma, which can affect our decisions in a multitude of ways, that, depending on the context of the trauma and the lesson associated with it.
Ni-C. How do you anticipate events unfolding? How can you observe them unfolding in your environment? How do you adjust yourself towards the way things are developing? Provide some examples.
If a situation is familiar, I would recall past events. Otherwise, I’ll just wait and see what happens. Though I have a tendency to repeat actions since I tend to forget what causes different events to take place, I seem to only really pay attention when I’m in the moment where the stress is at its peak.
Ni-D. Think about the way you experience the pace and rhythm of your life. What dictates the speed in which time flies? Why do you think people experience time passing at different rates?
Activities skew your perception of time, engaging activities cause time to fly by while boring and dull activities slow down the perception of time.
Activities will mess with how you measure time in your head, be doing something joyful time goes by quickly, or you're bored and time takes forever.
Ni-E. Consider each of the following feelings people have about time: hurriedness, anxiety, optimism/pessimism. What causes people to experience these feelings? What role do they play in our lives? To what extent are these feelings beneficial?
When people overthink the future, people will feel anxiety, which is just fear of what is yet to unfold. However, people can enjoy stress, I’m still pretty inexperienced, but before I try to reform myself due to religious reasons, I used to be extremely reckless and I used to get into fights and schemes purely because of boredom, and the anticipation of if I could get away with things or not. I may not really care about consequences to to some extent, but I still hope and work towards some things towards the future. But I’m still extremely absorbed in the present moment..