Interview with Aleksandr Bukalov and Olga Karpenko (International Institute of Socionics)

[Still Alive]

I do not neccessarily explain my reasoning in online posts. The things I perceive internally and the things I end up posting are somewhat different, which is probably due to the insignificance of forum postings, while I do have the ambition to create something timeless when I write seriously. Saying Ne=ideas implies that people who aren't Ne are incapable of having them, yet the most creative people I have seen in my life are Ni base. Saying Te=facts implies that Ti types are incapable of perceiving facts, which is honestly ridiculous. I especially made the observation that Ni base type focus highly on concrete information, especially the ones that they can see with their own eyes. It's not rare for a type like IEI to become a data scientist from my observation. I think a focus on "facts" is more of an indication that a person values Se, as it's the perception of concrete, objective reality, while Si valuing types do not care much about precision. You won't find Ne types in any kind of competitive environments and therefore they don't become celebrities, but you can only understand that when you value Ne yourself.

[Metamorph]

Now can we get back to talking about cybernetics instead of engaging Alive's histrionics? Everything I say about all you guys is turning out to be true, which is why you all get this little decrepit site to yourselves, but still, it doesn't make me want to crawl into the fly-trap.