Ultrarevolutionary Omniversalism RaptorWizard's notebook 2024 edition

[Raptor2016]

The 2006 World Cup Final was the Marcello Lippi Jynx Prophecy that Raptor just would become Arceus!!

[Raptor2016]

I get unbearably lonely at night because I can’t hear Bunny as strongly as I did in 2014!! It’s like a fantasy box with music and charms that I used to know, but is now invisible.

I started reading the Book of Mormon today, and it made me feel better. God is the best escape from physicality. And prophetic journeys help me to feel part of a bigger and more adventurous cosmology. I even get to be the shining 1… that’s the humble role I played!!

A Wrinkle In Time Book Trailer


Bunny says she's sorry - ALL I HAVE TO DO IS LOVE HER!!

[Raptor2016]

Raptor Loves Bunny for presents of language and symphony restoring light and mystery to outlandish doorways of flutter and empathy warming my heart with chapters of soul and wisdom

[Raptor2016]

Star Wars Episode 1 Racer GBC:Main Menu Music/Duel of Fates Music


RaptorWizard won Boonta Eve as Euro 2000 with the Prophecy that Rare Wartortle Wisdom turns a foolish Meganium into a Wise Lugia!!

[Raptor2016]

A Forward Introduction to "Schematics Philosophy of the Solution Master"


In my Schematics Philosophy of the Solution Master, I'm always asking the “what-if� questions. I wonder about how considered phenomena functions and why, seeking out all of the possibilities everywhere - even for problems which don't exist as of now, or for projects yet to be initiated. The answers I generate are then expressed and subjected to further refinements as needed. They all have varying levels of truth and completion; that's why we should each critically evaluate what we actually integrate into our own ideologies. Sometimes we may even find that fantasy can transcend truth and make things more meaningful. Always have faith in your life promise. True mastery comes from the power of “I Am�. Learn to command thyself, and then the whole world will revolve within your hands. Realize that this ultimate control is over your own destiny. The horizons ahead can be laid bare to your gaze and shaped into whatever you wish them to become - that is, if your force of will is sufficiently powerful for the specific feats it's directed towards. The desired results may take much time to manifest, and even then in ambiguous ways, but with the right amount of mental preparation, anything can happen. Challenges can be conquered mentally, by going from conceptual simulations (thought experiments) to superholographic cybernetics (projected effects). The mind can break our chains and free us from all restrictions. Will we make it through victory road? If so, then our last task towards freedom would be to checkmate the dark-sided King at the Game's highest stage for the win! Happiness isn't perfect until it's shared, so let love lay the foundation and point the way!

[Raptor2016]

Zidane World cup 1998

[Raptor2016]

Raptor beat Nikola Tesla in 2006, 2010, and 2013. 2013 was part of a very glorious past. I was Rayquaza Riley and Hicks Exeggutor. It was the golden age, the legacy of the empire. I was the ultimate martial artist ever. I was a great philosopher as well, and a hero to the Ming Dynasty. Raptor focused harder than ever, released his training, unleashed deadly hurricanes of precision. And 2006 was a crowning achievement as well, Leonardo da Vinci, grand designer of systems and blueprints. He was far greater than Tesla. Da Vinci Raptor was Lugia, not Tesla.

[Raptor2016]

2016 was the great noon, Rhydon as Charizard Michael Jordan. It proved the Pokémon number code in NBA Finals. This stamped Raptor as 7-1 Lugia in 2002 and 2014!!

[Raptor2016]

Raptor was stamped as the Net in 2023, Erling Haaland Riley Halloween. Raptor showed all the signs and emblems he’s the Nerevarine and Revan, Rhydon and Raichu Arceus.

[Raptor2016]

Kung Fu Panda 4 is an upcoming animated martial arts comedy film produced by DreamWorks Animation and distributed by Universal Pictures. It is the fourth installment in the Kung Fu Panda franchise, and the sequel to Kung Fu Panda 3 (2016). The film is directed by Mike Mitchell and co-directed by Stephanie Ma Stine, and features Jack Black, Dustin Hoffman, James Hong, Bryan Cranston, and Ian McShane reprising their roles from the previous films, with Awkwafina, Viola Davis, and Ke Huy Quan joining the cast as new characters.


Directors Jennifer Yuh Nelson and Alessandro Carloni were asked about the possibility of a fourth Kung Fu Panda film prior to the release of the third film in January 2016, with Nelson later saying in August 2018 that she was open to a fourth installment. DreamWorks officially announced the fourth film in August 2022, with Mitchell, Ma Stine, and Rebecca Huntley attached as director, co-director, and producer respectively by April 2023. Most of the main voice cast was announced in December 2023, following Awkwafina's casting in May of that year.


Kung Fu Panda 4 is scheduled to be theatrically released in the United States on March 8, 2024.


Premise
Po, who is set to become the Spiritual Leader of the Valley of Peace, searches for his successor as the new Dragon Warrior while fighting a new foe called "The Chameleon".

[Raptor2016]

The Grand Design
Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow
Ch. 1 The Mystery of Being


p 5 Raises philosophical questions like "Where did this all come from? Did the universe need a creator?" Then responds with "Traditionally these are questions for philosophy, but philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics." I think these are really stupid statements, so my immediate impression was that I hope Hawking gets a great burst of sales from pre-publicity, because if this kind of statement characterizes the approach, the public is going to get wind of it. Another thing that came to mind was G. K. Chesterton's statement "Philosophy is thought that is well thought-out" None of this seems well thought-out.


p6 gives Feynmann a ride, and points to idea that universe has no single history.


p7 basically argues against common sense, in that it is tied to common experience. Also introduces a kind of post-modern view of truth. "If two such physical theories or models accurately predict the same events, one cannot be said to be more real than the other; rather, we are free to use whichever model is most convenient." This appears to be saying there is no ultimate truth or reality.


p8 Points to M-theory as the model for an ultimate "theory of everything".


p10 Ends with profoundly philosophical questions "Why is there something rather than nothing?, Why do we exist?, Why this particular set of laws and not some other?" but has trivialized philosophy and rambled in a post-modern way, even after declaring that philosophy is dead.


Ch. 2 The Rule of Law


p15-28 A rather lame historical essay about the development of physical law.


p 29 Again raises philosophical questions "What is the origin of the laws? Are there any exceptions to the laws, i.e., miracles? Is there only one set of possible laws?" Does raise the view of Galileo, Descartes and Newton that the laws are the work of God, but then flippantly dismisses it as "a definition of God as the embodiment of the laws of nature." That's the kind of thing Steven Weinberg says, so it gives you some idea of the thought that has influenced these authors.


p 30 Drags out LaPlace's reply to Napoleon about where God fits "Sire, I have not needed that hypothesis."


p 30-31 Raises and ridicules the idea of free will.


p 31 "Though we feel that we can choose what we do, our understanding of the molecular basis of biology shows that biological processes are governed by the laws of physics and chemistry and are therefore as determined as the orbits of the planets."


p 32 pg 1 "it seems that we are no more than biological machines and that free will is just an illusion." Sounds like Daniel Dennett. This whole thing does not sound like Hawking to me - just a rambling of all the common punch lines of the new atheists.


p 33 Continues with the general rambling about the complexity of human consciousness, and it is not apparent why either author would pretend to have any particular expertise on that subject.


p


p 34 "This book is rooted in the concept of scientific determinism, which implies that the answer to question two is that there are no miracles, or exceptions to the laws of nature."


p 34 Later in the same paragraph, "do we really have reason to believe that an objective reality exists?" This seems like a swing from total philosophical materialism to some kind of weird non-materialism, all in one paragraph!


Ch. 3 What Is Reality?


p 42 "There is no picture- or theory-independent concept of reality."


p 48 Has spent several pages defending the idea of "model-dependent realism".


p 51 Qualities of a good model.


Ch. 4 Alternative Histories


p63 Uses buckyball interference to make the case that quantum phenomena are sometimes counterintuitive - behave like waves when you expect point particle behavior.


p69 Wave particle duality


p70 Uncertainty principle


p74 probabilities as fundamental randomness in QM


p75 Idea of all possible paths in interpreting Young experiment


p77 Feynman view of quantum reality


p79 "It turns out that for large objects, paths very similar to the path predicted by Newton's will have similar phases and add up to give by far the largest contribution to the sum, and so the only destination that has a probability effectively greater than zero is the destination predicted by Newtonian theory, and that destination has a probability that is very nearly one." This is like my baseball wavelength example, and appears to totally undermine their claim that the double-slit type wave behavior can be applied to the whole universe, except in the very early stages where the universe is of quantum scale.


p80 Sum over histories formulation of quantum mechanics


p82 "observations you make on a system affect its past." This refers to the ideas of Wheeler, interesting since Wheeler thought we made the past.


p82 "Quantum physics tells us that no mattter how thorough our observation of the present, the (unobserved) past, like the future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities. The universe, according to quantum physics, has no single past, or history. "


p83 "We will see that, like a particle, the universe doesn't have just a single history, but every possible history, each with its own probability; and our observations of its current state affect its past and determine the different histories of the universe, just as the observations of the particles in the double-slit experiment affect the particles' past."


Ch. 5 The Theory of Everything


p88 Good statement about comparison of electricity/magnetism and gravity.


p90-100 Good buildup of basic ideas fo E&M and Relativity


p100 The rationale for general relativity


p101-102 Good qualitative description of general relativity


p102 Says there would be a 10km/day error in the GPS system if general relativit were not taken into account.


p103 Overview of the four forces.


p104 QED and other quantum field theories


p106 Feynman diagrams


p107 Renormalization


p108 Lamb shift


p109 QCD and quark color, asymptotic freedom


p111 Proton decay experiment, bad news for GUTs.


p112 Quantum gravity dilemma


p114 Supersymmetry


p115 Touches on string theory


p117 Calls "M theory" the common theory that unites the 5 or so string theories. Says that it implies 10 spatial dimensions plus one time dimension.


p118 pg2 "The laws of M-theory therefore allow for different universes with different apparent laws, depending on how the internal space is curled. M-theory has solutions that allow for many different internal spaces, perhaps as many as 10500 ..."


p119 Pretty well morphs M-theory into multiverse.


This chapter is a great overview of a lot of modern physics information and offers some redemption for the bad start in chapter 1. Maybe not as eloquent as Greene's Elegant Universe, but a good job of packing a lot of ideas into a short chapter in accessible language.


Ch. 6 Choosing Our Universe


p124 After spinning over creation myths, goes to evidence for a beginning.


p125 Eddingtons balloon in picturing expanding universe


p126 Friedmann equation


p127 More on Friedmann equation, Lemaitre's contribution.


p127 Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation


p128 H-He abundance


p129 Discusses fact that all rules break down near the singularity


p129 Discussion of inflation, with assertion that space can expand faster than the speed of light.


p130 Fluctuations in CMBR measured by COBE and WMAP.


p130 Discussion of the uniformity of CMBR as an argument for inflation because there is not enough time for thermal equilibrium of the CMBR otherwise - "there would have been enough time for equalization to happen in the extremely tiny preinflationary early universe."


p130 "The problem is, for our theoretical models of inflation to work, the initial state of the universe had to be set up in a very special and highly improbable way. Thus traditional inflation theory resolves one set of issues but creates another - the need for a very special initial state."


p134 A new idea to me "In the early universe - when the universe was small enough to be governed by both general relativity and quantum theory - there were effectively four dimensions of space and none of time. That means that when we speak of the 'beginning' of the universe, we are skirting the subtle issue that as we look backward toward the very early universe, time as we know it does not exist!"


p135 "This idea that histories should be closed surfaces without boundary is called the no-boundary condition."


p135 "The realization that time behaves like space presents a new alternative. It removes the age-old objection to the universe having a beginning, but also means that the beginning of the universe was governed by the laws of science and doesn't need to be set in motion by some god." Interesting that on p29 they flippantly dismiss the idea that the laws of nature are creations of God as "a definition of God as the embodiment of the laws of nature." Now they have come to the point where they say "the laws of science are God".


p 136 "The universe appeared spontaneously, starting off in every possible way." This by way of summary after asserting that the beginning of the universe can be described by a Feynman sum over histories.


p136 Visualization of creation as like the formation of bubbles of steam in boiling water - the different bubbles represent different histories.


p138 The necessary non-uniformities in inflation as revealed by COBE and WMAP.


p138 picture from WMAP at 13.7 Gy with variations in temperature in thousandths of a degree.


p139 "So look carefully at the map of the microwave sky. It is the blueprint for all the structure in the universe. We are the product of quantum fluctuations in the very early universe. If one were religious, one would say that God really does play dice."


p139 "top down" rather than "bottom up" they say because the universe is a Feynman sum over histories. This line of reasoning is followed to pg 140 where it concludes "We create history by our observation, rather than history creating us." Sounds very "Wheeler-ish".


p142 An interesting comment, also appearing earlier: "The no-boundary condition implies that the probability amplitude is highest for histories in which the universe starts out completely smooth. The amplitude is reduced for universes that are more irregular." According to WMAP, our universe was slightly irregular, with temperature variations of milli-degrees Kelvin.


p143 Parrots the principle of mediocraty.


p144 "There seems to be a vast landscape of possible universes. However, as we'll see in the next chapter, universes in which life like us can exist are rare. We live in one in which life is possible, but if the universe were only slightly different, beings like us could not exist. What are we to make of this fine-tuning? Is it evidence that the universe, after all, was designed by a benevolent creator? Or does science offer another explanation?"


Ch. 7 The Apparent Miracle


p149 "Our solar system has other 'lucky' properties without which sophisticated life- forms might never have evolved."


p152 Nice "Goldilocks zone" illustration of Earth in habitable zone.


p153 Goes through some of the "rare Earth" scenarios, and on p153 comments on Newton's belief that it was God's creation. They comment "It is easy to understand why one might think that. The many improbable occurrences that conspired to enable our existence, and our world's human-friendly design, would indeed by puzzling if ours were the only solar system in the universe." Then goes off on a discussion worthy of Sagan.


p154 Does actually name the "weak anthropic principle" that he has been using.


p154 Then goes off on some "selection" scenarios that are similar to those Hugh Ross uses in "Why the Universe is the Way It Is".


p155 Moves to a stronger form of the anthropic principle, which surprised me a bit. "The strong anthropic principle suggests that the fact that we exist imposes constraints not just on our environment but on the possible form and content of the laws of nature themselves. The idea arose because it is not only the peculiar characteristics of our solar system that seem oddly conducive to the development of human life but also the characteristics of our entire universe, and that is much more difficult to explain."


p156 Part of the tale I tell in "Windows of Creation", so keep these few pages in mind to review that treatment.


p159 A discussion of the carbon resonance necessary for the triple-alpha process to proceed. A good Hoyle quote, but no source for it - need to find it. "I do not believe than any scientist who examined the evidence would fail to draw the inference that the laws of nuclear physics have been deliberately designed with regard to the consequences they produce inside the stars." Source is Hoyle, F., in Stockwood, M., ed., "Religion and the Scientists: Addresses Delivered in the University Church, Cambridge," Lent Term, 1957, SCM Press: London, 1959, p.64


p159 "Such calculations show that a change of as little as 0.5% in the strength of the strong nuclear force, or 4 percent in the electric force, would destroy either nearly all carbon or all oxygen in every star, and hence the possibility of life as we know it. "


p160 More anthropic details - actually quite a good summary. Includes requirement of three space dimensions for stable orbits.


p161 "The emergence of the complex structures capable of supporting intelligent observers seems to be very fragile. The laws of nature form a system hat is extremely fine-tuned, and very litle in physical law can be altered without destroying the possibility of the development of life as we know it. Were it not for a series of startling coincidences in the precise details of physical law, it seems, humans and similar life-forms would never have come into being."


p162 Discussion of dark energy and the 120 orders of magnitude reduction


p162 "Our universe and its laws appear to have a design that both is tailor-made to support us and, if we are to exist, leaves little room for alteration. That is not easily explained, and raises the natural question of why it is that way."


p164 "The multiverse idea is not a notion invented to account for the miracle of fine-tuning. It is a consequence of the no-boundary condition as well as many other theories of modern cosmology."


p165 "But just as Darwin and Wallace explained how the apparently miraculous design of living forms could appear without intervention by a supreme being, the multiverse concept can explain the fine-tuning of physical law without the need for a benevolent creator who made the universe for our benefit."


Ch. 8 The Grand Design


p 171 Interesting that pp171-180 are devoted to describing Conway's "Game of Life".


p180 "If the total energy of the universe must always remain zero, and it costs energy to create a body, how can a whole universe be created from nothing? That is why there must be a law like gravity. Because gravity is attractive, gravitational energy is negative." "Bodies such as stars or black holes cannot just appear out of nothing. But a whole universe can."


p180 "Because there is a law like gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing in the manner described in Chapter 6. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."


****
This phrase was mysterious to me - apparently common knowledge in Britain where the fuse of fireworks was "blue touch paper". "I'm not sure if folk of a younger generation can finish the sentence that begins 'Light blue touch-paper' but at one time it was written on every firework and was probably one of the first standard safety warnings for the general public. (Standard being itself a play on words for those of my generation since Standard Fireworks were one of the main manufacturers)."


The full sentence was 'Light blue touch-paper - stand well back' later replaced by 'Light blue touch-paper and retire.' The expression 'Light blue touch-paper!' therefore became a way of suggesting someone had done something dangerous or foolhardy and needed to beware of the consequences, especially, for example, when having said something that was likely to cause someone else to respond explosively.
****


p180-181 Further defense of supersymmetry, and M-theory as the only general candidate for a "complete theory of the universe. If it is finite - and this has yet to be proved it will be a model of a universe that creates itself."


p181 "If the theory is confirmed by observation, it will be the successful conclusion of a search going back more than 3,000 years. We will have found the Grand Design."

Great Minds: Stephen Hawking - The Grand Design Of The Universe

[Raptor2016]

Raptor won in 2019, was Pirlo Leonardo in 2006, won the 2014 World Cup as Bunny, timing prototype accelerator groves of heartfelt sun kisses and twitching exhilaration to sprites of coves and deluges prophesying luster and flourishing medallions to combat and ace general serpent tales gazing lordship and wings of steel

[Raptor2016]

Raptor was Lugia (Lucifer) in 2006, 2014, and 2016, evolutionary voices of color and blessings to install giga plagued trading cards of skyrockets and pulses of mystery enthralling magical post cards and gifts of imperishable shores and thriving paradises gleaming in silver shock waves covering the precipice in faith and will

[Raptor2016]

Raptor was Lugia in 2005 Pokémon Gale of Darkness, and 2006 when Zapdos Tesla wasn’t Lugia.

[Raptor2016]

Lugia (Japanese: ルギア Lugia) is a dual-type Psychic/Flying Legendary Pokémon introduced in Generation II.


It is not known to evolve into or from any other Pokémon.


Lugia is the game mascot of Pokémon Silver, its remake Pokémon SoulSilver, and Pokémon : Gale of Darkness (as Shadow Lugia), appearing on the boxart of them all.


Lugia and Ho-Oh are often collectively referred to as the tower duo by fans. It is also often viewed as the leader of the Legendary birds due to its role in the anime and Mystery Dungeon series.


Lugia has an alternate form called Shadow Lugia, codenamed 001, that appeared in Pokémon : Gale of Darkness.

[Raptor2016]

Being like Kobe is about thinking of the furthest extremities of reason and intellect. It’s a desire, a wishful color, a grand design. Kobe pictures things in an overhauled and grappling form. He has full faith in his abilities, willpower, and potential. Kobe maximizes every second of every year. He dreams big. He lets ideas take flight. He enters the Wonderland creative mode of the explorer of all abstraction. He remembers those he’s closest to in universal consciousness. Kobe is the cause rather than the effect. He is playing chess rather than checkers. He fashions the jewels of his will with the most all intoxicating hunger. Kobe seeks nothing but his work, nothing but his enjoyment.

[Raptor2016]

Bunny is a free flyer. She goes almost purely by the flow of emotions. Bunny has a lot of fears. She remembers everything close and dear in her heart. Bunny has a very pure and playful mind. She loves traveling with people on adventures. Bunny enjoys experiencing the full spectrum of feelings and moods. She always forgives the noble hearted. Bunny values the powers of Love and Imagination above all else*!!

[Raptor2016]

Uefa Final 2010 was the dream matchup, Bayern vs Inter, oceans of extravagant language and flow destiny bound to caves of reflection and insight to recollect and conjure frenzy and passion drilling magic and glamour artfully blazing firmament tamed sigils and anchors of activation thunderbolt casting silver

[Raptor2016]

Bunny is Riley the Raichu RaptorWizard's wife, angelic flurries of cornucopia and emblems of jazz waving polarities and dancing cinema entertaining miracles

[Raptor2016]

Judge Naleshekan: A giant firaxan? Could it be... Impossible! It is only a legend.
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Jhosa: But (s)he said he killed it... didn't (s)he?
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Shelkar: You killed this shark, human?
KotOR Icon Dialog.png 1. I didn't kill the shark! KotOR Icon Dialog.png 2. I destroyed the machinery to save it. KotOR Icon Dialog.png 3. The machine was making it drive everyone mad.
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Jhosa: The Progenitor... it must have been!
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Duula: Be quiet! That is merely a myth, and not fit for outsiders to hear!
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Kota: But if it was the life-bringer... the ancestor of our species... Think of what this could mean!
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Jhosa: If it always laired there... then perhaps the kolto...
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Shelkar: Enough! Off-worlders are not to hear of such things!
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Kota: But (s)he said he saved it... He/She destroyed the harvesters to save it.
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Shelkar: Indeed. This casts your actions in a new light, human. This, I believe, will require more thought... both on your actions, and on what we must do in response. This court will adjourn while we deliberate.
KotOR Icon Dialog.png Judge Shelkar: We have reviewed your actions and the situation, human. We thank you for the destruction of the machinery and saving the giant firaxan which, we believe, is the source of our kolto... or at least its guardian. We will not detain you any longer. While we cannot show our gratitude overtly, know that you have earned our respect. This trial is now over.

[FreelancePoliceman]

@RhydonRevan

How serious are you about wanting adventure? It seems to me that you're staying in the same place. Want to change things up?

[Raptor2016]

@RhydonRevan

How serious are you about wanting adventure? It seems to me that you're staying in the same place. Want to change things up?

Well, I'm trying to move forward into the future by creating the perfect past. Once everything is secured, I'm speculating about infinite possibilities. I'm building Star Maps to do this.

[Raptor2016]

2010 was the year of Kobe. He saw he had a chance to win the championship. Even though his health was failing. It was something he always visualized and dreamed of doing. The quest meant everything to him and more. It was a matter of fulfilling his ultimate life potential. Kobe was out to master the game. He was out to learn about his soul and the butterfly of transformation.

[Raptor2016]

Love showers my soul
Love restores my heart
Passion moves my gears
Sorrow bids my redemption
I feel the flutter
I am ablaze in song
I walk to heaven
I spread my laughter

[Raptor2016]

Even Raptor's losses help paint the picture of who he is. 2006 and 2013 were sad, terrible, mind crunching, yet maybe Lugia wasn't Nikola Tesla after all. Maybe Tesla had some virtue as Zidane and Tony Parker that I could identify with, yet it's not the way of the world, the way of destiny!!

[chriscorey]

I got your back!

[Kalinoche buenanoche]

@RhydonRevan, how come the "infinite possibilities" narrative is so appealing and how does the "no ultimate truth" narrative make you feel? What I get out of your mentioning the latter is that you do not embrace it and I think this is cool, coming from you.

[Raptor2016]

@RhydonRevan, how come the "infinite possibilities" narrative is so appealing and how does the "no ultimate truth" narrative make you feel? What I get out of your mentioning the latter is that you do not embrace it and I think this is cool, coming from you.

The endless spectra everywhere are a waterfall of understanding and grappling with the master-hood of joining the higher space alliances. I guess you could say the goal is to become God, and we may have accelerated windows to do this. Or perhaps we need to leave the universe. And in the mind, all things are possible. It's free will and willpower. The cockpit of discovery and revelation.

I've never needed something to be true to be meaningful. I just think ideas, unrestricted, growing, surging animate life and help make things more colorful. And it's good of course to ask questions, and not detain the galaxies of stories.

So ya, the views of horizons and acceptance certainly expand the perimeters of what we might find extraordinary.

[FreelancePoliceman]

Well, I'm trying to move forward into the future by creating the perfect past. Once everything is secured, I'm speculating about infinite possibilities. I'm building Star Maps to do this.

I think that's a trap. The past was bad. You have to move on instead of trying to reinvent it.

Infinite possibilities can also be bad if they prevent you from actualizing any. Don't you think?

[Raptor2016]

I think that's a trap. The past was bad. You have to move on instead of trying to reinvent it.

Infinite possibilities can also be bad if they prevent you from actualizing any. Don't you think?

Well, I think we both have something in common - we're trying to build the maximized future. I guess I'm just not as naturally strong minded at seeing through things. In fact, my lack of paranoia has led to me too openly revealing things that made people think I was paranoid. The truth could not be further from that - I'm not paranoid enough. I believe people's heartfelt stories too eagerly.

[FreelancePoliceman]

Well, I think we both have something in common - we're trying to build the maximized future. I guess I'm just not as naturally strong minded at seeing through things. In fact, my lack of paranoia has led to me too openly revealing things that made people think I was paranoid. The truth could not be further from that - I'm not paranoid enough. I believe people's heartfelt stories too eagerly.

Do you think you're avoidant?

[Raptor2016]

Do you think you're avoidant?

I think I have an extremely mild case of Schizoid, mostly the Imaginative part. 2nd is Antisocial, being really into RPGs. 3rd is Histrionic, loving storytelling. 4th is Schizotypal, but this is weaker, because I'm not that independent with my thinking.

[FreelancePoliceman]

I think I have an extremely mild case of Schizoid, mostly the Imaginative part. 2nd is Antisocial, being really into RPGs. 3rd is Histrionic, loving storytelling. 4th is Schizotypal, but this is weaker, because I'm not that independent with my thinking.

Do you want to change any of that?

[Raptor2016]

Do you want to change any of that?

I'm cool with my inner nature, but I want to find more harmony in the real world.

[FreelancePoliceman]

I'm cool with my inner nature, but I want to find more harmony in the real world.

Does that mean you'd like to be more involved with it?

[Raptor2016]

Does that mean you'd like to be more involved with it?

I don't intend on doing more with my body, but rather using my philosophy to find peaceful reflection.

[Raptor2016]

Amy Despain, SolitaryWalker, Zang, and Marius Florin all travel to Anakin Skywalker as Destruction and Typhlosion. Jogi Low Slowking

[FreelancePoliceman]

I don't intend on doing more with my body, but rather using my philosophy to find peaceful reflection.

Don't you think this is backwards? The aim of philosophy is to reconcile abstract and inhuman conceptions with reality as it is, and this effort is never and can never be completed. People create their own reality, but the creation seems to acquire a life of its own and stand above its creator, which is why it seems to need the specialized field of "philosophy" to understand. You turn to philosophy because it seems like your life is too much of a problem to deal with and take control of, yeah? But if you do manage to do that, then you won't need philosophy.

Another way of saying this is that peaceful reflection is only a poor imitation of a full life. I think you should aim toward living a good life, not reconciling yourself to one you feel you can't control.

[Raptor2016]

shadow lugia theme song: it ends tonight

[Raptor2016]

Chinese Fortune Cookie - If you continually give, you will continually have. Lucky Numbers ~ 49, 28, 9, 54, 6, 13