Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 103

Thread: Visual Identification Project (IEI edition)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Visual Identification Project (IEI edition)

    I am planning to write a longer post on my website about how people with the same type can sometimes be extremly similar but it might be constructive to have a thread here so I can think about how I am going to structure things. this is not a thread about type discussions. I just simply want to highlight visual aspects and got inspired by this video:



    not only do the people in the video look like twins, they also behave in a similar way.


    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/doppelgangers-dont-just-look-alike-they-also-share-dna-180980635/


    this article points out that:

    "new research suggests that doppelgängers have more in common than meets the eye. People with very similar faces also share many of the same genes and lifestyle traits, according to a new paper published Tuesday in the journal Cell Reports."

    all the examples in this thread are IEI from my point of view. please accept it and don't start unnecessary debates. this thread is not about type discussions and focuses completely on visual elements. I'm going to post here from time to time.
    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 04:57 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  2. #2
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this person got interviewed by Jack from World Socionics Society and looks like Barack Obama. I want to highlight that I do not endorse Jack or have anything to do with his school of socionics. I just thought the interview was interesting.



    Barack Obama and Indonesian president Joko Widodo look alike



    "the guardian" wrote an article about a person who looks similar to Obama.

    https://www.theguardian.com/theguard...ger-ilham-anas



    While Jack is a right-wing conservative, there's also leftist youtuber Vaush who creates videos with political commentary. I think they look alike in some of their videos.





    I do not get along with Jack but think that Vaush makes a lot of points I can relate to, which makes me think that political orientation (which might be a core structure of personality that's relatively fixed) is more important than type compatibility, because I think Vaush and Jack have the same sociotype. It likely also heavily influences relationship stability between people.
    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 05:35 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  3. #3
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Subteigh: while your points are interesting, the main point of this thread is really just to collect visual similarities. I personally won't participate in discussions here.

    Yevgeny Prigozhin looks similar to Pope Francis. conservative german politician Friedrich Merz also looks a bit similar



    Ryan Gosling looks like Amin al-Husseini, a muslim leader and nationalist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amin_al-Husseini



    soccer player Eric Cantona looks similar to mathematician Grigori Perelman



    this youtuber, who creates videos about math, looks like Jeff Bezos



    Bill Ackman also resembles Jeff Bezos in my opinion

    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 05:39 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  4. #4
    Subthigh Socionics Is A Cult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,276
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Visual identification for Socionics would probably be feasible if Socionics is true, but alas, it's lacking objective definitions and is in all probability false.

    However, I'll try and put some readily observable traits of people based on what I've read from Big Five research, I think it'd have some applicability to Socionics if it was true. I'm just going from what I recall, so some of the details may be wrong or weak.

    Having tattoos and piercings is associated with higher levels of openness to experience, and lower levels of agreeableness and lower levels of conscientiousness (the more abnormal and in-your-face they are, I guess the more likely they are to be XNTP traits). Gang\criminal tattoos are probably more associated with XSTP.

    Having a friendly expression as well as smiling is correlated with extroversion and agreeableness.

    Dying your hair unusual colours is associated with openness to experience and maybe also extroversion and agreeableness: regarding dying hair, this is perhaps the one where my memory is weakest.

    Long hair is associated with lower levels of conscientiousness. I can see why it would but also why it wouldn't: on one hand, it takes some persistence to grow your hair long, and on the otherhand, short hair is possibly a sign you have your hair cut regularly even if it strictly it is only a sign you had your hair cut recently. I can see conscientious people having their hair cut short (and being clean-shaven, where applicable) as part of a way they keep a "neat" appearance in their view. I can also see how punks and other social contrarians might cut their hair short. I think there are also different dynamics for gender too.

    Having a pickup truck is correlated with being more likely to be a Trump supporter and conservative - especially if you have a Confederate flag I guess, so a sign of below average openness to experience.

    Having a display of religiosity is also a sign of conservatives and below average openness to experience and above average conscientiousness (probably other traits too).

    I'll post more if I can think of more or re-discover more.

  5. #5
    Aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    whatever you think
    Posts
    4,119
    Mentioned
    601 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Asleep I want an IEI twin
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  6. #6
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Claire Boucher, also known as Grimes, looks similar to Margaret Mead, who was a cultural anthropologist. Grimes also resembles Emily Dickinson



    and weirdly enough, Talulah Riley, who was also in a relationship with Elon Musk. I think Grimes also looks a bit like Frida Kahlo



    Candace Owens looks like her. Shivon Zilis, with whom Elon Musk also has children with, looks somewhat similar to grimes too, but not as much. she does however look a bit like actress Samara Weaving



    who looks like actress Denise Richards, Margot Robbie and Jaime Pressly...



    Margot Robbie and Jaime Pressly look in fact so similar, you can mesh their faces together



    Heath Ledger and Joseph Gordon-Levitt



    Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Coach Nico Kovac

    Last edited by Still Alive; 04-14-2024 at 11:51 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  7. #7
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of scientology, looks like filmmaker Christopher Nolan



    actors Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Javier Bardem look like twins



    artist Little Simz in my opinion resembles soccer player Kylian Mbappé



    she wrote an excellent song that is basically about being an INFx personality type

    Last edited by Still Alive; 02-10-2024 at 04:45 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  8. #8
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    with the help of his community, youtuber penguinz0 has found several people who look like him and also behave in a similar way





    Last edited by Still Alive; 06-03-2024 at 06:15 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  9. #9
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    two more penguinz0 look-a-likes (I can only upload 4 videos per post)





    Nicole Poturalski and Irina Shayk are both models and look like twins.



    Denise Ohnona and Kate Moss



    Stephen Colbert and Bob Saget look very similar and guess what, they are both comedians



    Kofi Annan won a nobel peace price but also looks like actor Morgan Freeman. novelist Wole Soyinka also resembles them.



    novelist Abdulrazak Gurnah slightly resembles them, also soul singer Robert Finley who also looks like Jimy Hendrix





    Gil Scott Heron and Jimy Hendrix also look similar



    Musician Andre 3000 played Jimy Hendrix



    and resembles Sly Stone



    he also looks like quarterback Robert Griffin III



    Tupac looks like Kobe Bryant



    the basketball players Mookie Blaylock and Michael Jordan look very similar



    soccer players Roy Makaay and Luiz Suárez also look-a-like



    Sergio Ramos and Joseph Stalin



    Mesut Özil and Enzo Ferrari



    Luka Modric, Johan Cruyff and David Guetta



    Memphis Depay from the Netherlands and Neymar.



    Florian Wirtz from Germany, Netherlands Goalkeeper Bart Verbruggen



    Lionel Messi and Björn Borg

    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-22-2024 at 11:42 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  10. #10
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    musician Jack White and actor johnny depp



    actor Cillian Murphy and musician Jonny Greenwood



    PJ Harvey, Julia Holter



    Marlene Dietrich and Marylin Monroe



    James Brolin, the father of Josh Brolin, and Christian Bale, all three are actors



    Lana Del Rey and Priscilla Presley



    Hannah Davis and Fiona Apple



    Fiona Apple and rapper Ty Dolla $ign...



    Joni Mitchell and Nico



    Feist and Patti Smith

    Last edited by Still Alive; 06-19-2024 at 09:00 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  11. #11
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Jordan Peterson and artist MC Escher



    writer Hermann Hesse, german politician Karl Lauterbach


    Stanley Kubrick and Salman Rushdie



    musicians Runtown and Kendrick Lamar look almost identical. they also look like handball player Benoit Kounkoud and rapper King Los



    B.O.B. and JPEGMafia

    Last edited by Still Alive; 06-27-2024 at 05:00 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  12. #12
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Stan Lee and Gino Paoli



    Scarlett Johansson and Amber Heard

    Last edited by Still Alive; 06-28-2024 at 07:45 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,763
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    anyone has one head. all people are similar. hence all are IEI

    psyche traits should be decided on a behavior

    > not only do the people in the video look like twins, they also behave in a similar way

    to have much similarly in appearance does not mean to have same Jung types
    to have much different appearance does not mean to have differing Jung types

    only a behavior can be linked directly with Jung types theory
    Last edited by Sol; 11-10-2023 at 10:13 AM.

  14. #14
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Talking Heads Frontman David Byrne and philosopher Robert Nozick, scholar Douglas Hofstadter, who wrote books like "Gödel, Escher, Bach", and Carl Sagan. I think each person looks a little like the next one.



    Kurt Gödel and Samuell Beckett don't exactly look alike, but I thought it was interesting that they both have a black strand of hair. might be purely coincidental, though



    Billy Joel and Sylvester Stallone

    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 02:36 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  15. #15
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IEI's with very artistic tendencies tend to potray themselves in an otherworldy or reflective way

    film director Andrey Tarkovsky and Robert Bresson and also writer Osamu Dazai and Aldous Huxley



    author Olaf Stapledon and scientist Alan Turing



    The Doors front man Jim Morrison and Nick Drake



    Van Morrison and Don McLean

    Last edited by Still Alive; 11-17-2023 at 09:34 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  16. #16
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    George Jones and Jim Carrey



    Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carr

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  17. #17
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dustin Hofmann, Leonard Cohen, Al Pacino, J.D. Salinger

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  18. #18
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    youtuber Ray William Johnson reminds me a lot of green day singer Billie Joe Armstrong



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-IuU3S9tQ8
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUTGr5t3MoY
    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 06:18 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  19. #19
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    David Cameron and Marc Zuckerberg



    musician Barry White, chess player Hikaru Nakamura and Jazz player Charles Mingus

    Last edited by Still Alive; 02-10-2024 at 05:02 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  20. #20
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Alan Rickman, Simon Phillips, Elliott Smith, german musician Bela B


    Last edited by Still Alive; 02-10-2024 at 05:05 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  21. #21
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    actor William H. Macy and german musician Helge Schneider

    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 02:38 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  22. #22
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Allen Ginsberg and Francis Ford Coppola



    Allen Ginsberg & Jeff Goldblum

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  23. #23
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Glenn Gould and Christian Bale

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  24. #24
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    several film directors (spielberg, spike lee, coppola etc.) share the same style which is quite common among artists

    Last edited by Still Alive; 05-26-2024 at 06:28 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  25. #25
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Burt Reynolds and Marlon Brando

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  26. #26
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Leonardo DiCaprio and Jack Nicholson



    young Walt Disney and german comedian Jan Böhmermann



    chess player José Raúl Capablanca and Simon Krätschmer, another german comedian

    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-21-2024 at 05:04 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  27. #27
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Grace Kelly and Ingrid Bergman



    Jane Levy and Emma Stone

    Last edited by Still Alive; 02-10-2024 at 05:26 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  28. #28
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    soccer player David Alaba and musician Tyler, the Creator



    David Alaba also looks like Kingslay Coman and they even played for the same team. basketball player Iman Shumpert also looks like them
    .
    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-13-2024 at 07:53 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  29. #29
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    basketball player Nihad Djedovic and soccer player Zlatan Ibrahimovic

    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 02:38 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  30. #30
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think these two youtubers resemble each other in some facial expressions







    one day sol will get banned and I'm gonna be happy (it happened and I'm happy).

    this woman from east africa reminds me of Cardi B in the way she carries herself.





    actor Donald Glover and youtuber Jordan Howlett resemble each other



    https://www.youtube.com/@jordan_the_stallion8
    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 02:44 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  31. #31
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    phew, first page done. I'm gonna take a break for a while. still have many examples to go through, but it's quite time consuming. you can find countless of doppelgänger blogs on the internet that contain half of the examples here, so I'm not sure if it's even all that important, considering that I think over 90% of all actors, professional musicians, celebrities etc. are IEI anyway. I have been wondering if I should also include non-famous people, as you can find countless examples too, probably even more, as you are not limited to a smaller pool of people
    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-13-2024 at 07:54 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  32. #32
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, a german conservative politician, and Veronika Grimm, a well-known economist in germany



    I'm more and more leaning towards the idea that every type has a myriad of subtypes and saying things like "this person has Fe" is somewhat pointless because every function can likely show itself through different ways. I think the more emotional IEI's are more idealistic, artistic, and care a lot about social issues, while there is a group of IEI who can be considered realists, pragmatists, and consider themselves individualistic and both groups pretty much seem to hate each other. It's really unclear to me how many of these variations exist, though. I'm just making observations
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  33. #33
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    writer H.P. Lovecraft and american president Woodrow Wilson



    In almost all of Lovecraft’s stories, the narrator or protagonist is a scholar, someone of high education, good social breeding and standing, and possessor of a healthy skepticism. In other words, the characters are, in many cases, reflections of Lovecraft himself. His rationalism and disdain for religion in all its forms built upon established classical mythology and resulted in something new and revolutionary.

    Wilson's tariff, banking, and regulatory reforms were driven more by a quest for rationality and efficiency than by empathy and compassion.

    Alec Baldwin and president Millard Fillmore



    Bill Nye and president Abraham Lincoln



    president Andrew Johnson and Tommy Lee Jones

    Last edited by Still Alive; 04-03-2024 at 09:18 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  34. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2024
    TIM
    SLE, SLUEN, VFLE
    Posts
    144
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lmfao

  35. #35
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Astrid Lindgren and Albert Einstein

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  36. #36
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by on a peaceful hiatus View Post
    Brett Cooper and Ben Shapiro, two conservative public figures, communicate in a similar way and also have the same ideological convictions

    posted it in another thread but it fits here oo:

    Ben Shapiro, who works with Brett Cooper at the Daily Wire, looks like actor Daniel Doheny





    What's interesting is that Cooper and Shapiro communicate and behave in exactly the same way and are both right-wing conservatives, but actor Daniel Doheny can be considered more emotional and liberal, so they would probably hate each other, despite Shapiro and Doheny looking identical. the film Doheny stares in seems very bad and forgettable, but you can derive some conclusions from it. Doheny fits the definition of the socionics IEI much more as "sensible idealistic artist" (in this case actor), so you could say that socionics VI doesn't really work, and simiarities are merely a coincidence. I personally do not share this view though, as it does often seem that people who look the same behave the same. the other argument you could make, which I personally believe might be the case, is that there's a fixed number of subtypes within each type and the closer people of the same type are to a subtype, the more they are going to relate to one another. whether or not that subtype is flexible enough to change during ones life is another question, though. there's also the question whether or not that subtype is determined by someones genetics. I personally doubt that people "choose" to be philosophers or artists, so I think the latter is the case. what I also think is that most type descriptions are wrong or at least very limited or inaccurate and based on a small sample size and not the whole population.

    the magic of visual identification:



    this youtuber, who speaks fluent chinese and fits my definition of Ni as theoretical perfectionism also resembles Ben Shapiro in my opinion and is probably more similar to him overall

    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 06:17 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  37. #37
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    painter Nicolae Grigorescu and actor Orlando Bloom



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolae_Grigorescu

    General George S. Patton and Donald Trump



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_S._Patton

    Patton's colorful image, hard-driving personality, and success as a commander were at times overshadowed by his controversial public statements. His philosophy of leading from the front, and his ability to inspire troops with attention-getting, vulgarity-laden speeches

    Emmanuel Macron and french writer Boris Vian



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Vian
    Last edited by Still Alive; 09-17-2024 at 06:19 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  38. #38
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Jeremy Allen White and Gene Wilder



    officer Douglas MacArthur

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_MacArthur

    looks imo like Leonard Cohen in the first picture



    and like Bruce Willis in this picture



    this person who is sharing her life and her fight against ALS on youtube looks like Greta Thunberg



    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  39. #39
    Your family thinks I'm a criminal
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Your Mom's Pussy
    TIM
    DEAD
    Posts
    853
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    German man discovers that the eight billion people in the world have doppelgangers: the thread.

  40. #40
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DEAD View Post
    German man discovers that the eight billion people in the world have doppelgangers: the thread.
    random german man discovers after a decade of being involved in typology that all public figures have the same sociotype and that the other 15 are heavily underrepresented which has huge implications for our collective, global society and the dynamics happening within it. instead of having countless subjective debates about it that don't lead anywhere due to people having their own cognitive biasis, he tries to find some objective way to proof his observations with photos and videos that support his claim. Like it is with many discoveries, most people around him do not understand what he is doing or seeing and instead criticize him, but over time it will become apparent that he was right.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •