good job for LII that isnt math, science, tech stuff

[Distance]

Now, battle-typing a self-typed LII to SEE is just trolling. Wouldn't the most likely ethical type based on his brief self-description be IEI, not SEE?

How do you square the questionnaire?

[Metamorph]

How do you square the questionnaire?

I'm pretty opposed to socionics in general and this site in particular, but still sounds much more IEI than SEE.

Do you have any sort of spiritual/religious beliefs, and why do you hold (or don't) those beliefs in the first place?
numberology. numbers are really accursed man. we didnt invent math, we only gentrified it.
ghosts are real but their not from this dimension. telepathy is real. telekinesis is real but near impossible (unless you have quantum on you)

colours also carry hidden meanings. reality exists in layers (subreal, real, hyperreal).

What have you had long conversations about? What are your interests? Why?
i do not have long conversations. i prefer to do over talk. i have many interests, including personality theory, paranormal, videogames, metaphysics, but being outdoors is nice too, but only with a friend. I can't pinpoint why i like what i like, maybe its Se-Ni valuement.

What do you think of daily chores?
i am indifferent to daily chores. i'll do them if i have to but i will be on autopilot

Ever feel stuck in a rut? If yes, describe the causes and your reaction to it.
I feel stuck in a rut when it seems other people push me down and get away with it. IT makes me feel like im doomed to fail, bejinxed, unlucky. I usually simmer in anger but try to avoid blowing up, due to fear of retribution. i try to cope with things in my control, but i fear everytthing could be taken from me.

How do you feel about romance/sex? What qualities do you want in a partner?
im ambivalent about sex. there are some thnigs i want to try, but other aspects of it i find awful. i prefer symbolic displays of sexuality over the actual act of it. Romance, i sometimes desire, sometimes disdain. i often wonder if i can give enough to a partner or if ill be left behind similarly to friendships. i want a partner who has goals, is self-confident, and doesnt expect emotional displays from me. one who supports me instead of challenging me.

How do you behave around strangers?
around strangers i am vigilant. i do not trust strangers. i will maintain cordiality but thats it. i am disinterested in getting to know someone or being a part of their projects.

Saying some philosophical stuff about power shouldn't be Se or Nietzsche would've been SEE. His descriptions of his bevahior sounds introverted, irrational, intuitive, and ethical to me. However, I would discourage anyone identifying with a type. The point is just to give people a role in the workforce and I think everyone should do STEM so I disregard that. Additionally, this site was founded to relate the sociotypes to Oldham styles, aka, euphemized personality disorders, so if someone really wants to learn typology, I'd recommend they got to PerC or some kind of chatroom instead.

[Distance]

I'm pretty opposed to socionics in general and this site in particular, but still sounds much more IEI than SEE.














Saying some philosophical stuff about power shouldn't be Se or Nietzsche would've been SEE. His descriptions of his bevahior sounds introverted, irrational, intuitive, and ethical to me. However, I would discourage anyone identifying with a type. The point is just to give people a role in the workforce and I think everyone should do STEM so I disregard that. Additionally, this site was founded to relate the sociotypes to Oldham styles, aka, euphemized personality disorders, so if someone really wants to learn typology, I'd recommend they got to PerC or some kind of chatroom instead.

As we know i'm going by his statements in the questionnaire. Do you see Si role? And he doesn't parse IEI here. I see no Ti or the format they role out in.

You can type him that way, but let's see if he identifies with the type?

Let's let him choose that.

[Metamorph]

As we know i'm going by his statements in the questionnaire. Do you see Si role? And he doesn't parse IEI here. I see no Ti or the format they role out in.

You can type him that way, but let's see if he identifies with the type?

Let's let him choose that.

I see Ti and not really any Te. He has models of the Universe with subreal, real, and hyperreal. He only likes to have a small number of close friends and doesn't do a lot of talking or outward displays of emotion. His Si role is when he does his chores on autopilot. None of this socionics stuff is really real, but he seems very clearly introverted to me so that should rule out SEE off the bat. Things like having ambitions should have nothing to do with Se even if he says he values ambitions. I think lots of introverted people have ambitions, even ones who barely want to do chores. He can pick whatever type he wants, though I'd prefer he pick none of them except as a curiosity and just focus on living his life. People who do socionics are always avoiding something, and anyway, the site used to be called "not a dating site" with the implication there was porn, which there really was sadly, it was just all in Discord and probably irc chats before then.

[anotherperson]

As we know i'm going by his statements in the questionnaire. Do you see Si role? And he doesn't parse IEI here. I see no Ti or the format they role out in.

You can type him that way, but let's see if he identifies with the type?

Let's let him choose that.

new idea. what if i take the other questionnaire too. imma do that and maybe yoiulll have more info.

[Muira]

I can't help but just cringe at how shit this site is at typing a lot of the times. @anotherperson Just answer a questionnaire I'm gonna give you, remember to actually take your time(3 days recommended), also for each question,

-I'll need you to give me one example from your past experience, and an explanation

-If the question is hard, say it's hard to answer.

-Create your own copy.
________________________________________________

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...it?usp=sharing


Here is an example of me answering one of the questions:

(Q) Describe your relationship to factual data, pragmatic/efficient thought, and competency in your environment. Is it important for you to feel well informed or supported by factual data, is this more important than your own ideological consistency? Explain. How important is it for you to ultimately do what works most efficiently or provides the most profit based on your own factual knowledge?

(A) I can handle massive amounts of information depending if I’m in the mood for it. Usually I like to make diagrams, graphs, etc, in order to understand what I am learning. I think my logic is consistent, though I over generalize, for example large groups of people for example when making a point. I can understand the complexity of this work, but my views are still black and white because I constantly feel the need to classify something.

(example from experience) For example, people say that gender is separate from pronouns, but you get charged or even loose your job for using the wrong pronouns, which then is called misgendering, which is seems to be supported by emotions and logic insconstitancy. So pronouns would be based on gender, and are if they cause such a identity crisis. I can’t just leave things on being on their own. I often generally tend to try to dissect information, and understand it before I make a judgement.

(Explanation) For example when someone says that girls are weaker than boys, I'd first ask on terms of what, as I do understand that girls and boys have a very distinct body traits, as boys are much more muscular on average due to higher testosterone. However in terms of mental strength and other factors, it has more to do with environmental factors, such as culture, childhood, trauma, etc. As boys tend to be more mentally stronger because society is harsher on boys when raising them, however if you look at girls who were raised harshly, they tend to be on par. So it's not really about sex in that way. Then, after understanding what that person means, and applying my knowledge and contextual understanding, then I'd judge in terms of if that person's statement is valid.

________________________________________________

There has got to be no way you'll fuck this up.

[anotherperson]

I can't help but just cringe at how shit this site is at typing a lot of the times. @anotherperson Just answer a questionnaire I'm gonna give you, remember to actually take your time(3 days recommended), also for each question,

-I'll need you to give me one example from your past experience, and an explanation

-If the question is hard, say it's hard to answer.

-Create your own copy.
________________________________________________

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...it?usp=sharing


Here is an example of me answering one of the questions:

(Q) Describe your relationship to factual data, pragmatic/efficient thought, and competency in your environment. Is it important for you to feel well informed or supported by factual data, is this more important than your own ideological consistency? Explain. How important is it for you to ultimately do what works most efficiently or provides the most profit based on your own factual knowledge?

(A) I can handle massive amounts of information depending if I’m in the mood for it. Usually I like to make diagrams, graphs, etc, in order to understand what I am learning. I think my logic is consistent, though I over generalize, for example large groups of people for example when making a point. I can understand the complexity of this work, but my views are still black and white because I constantly feel the need to classify something.

(example from experience) For example, people say that gender is separate from pronouns, but you get charged or even loose your job for using the wrong pronouns, which then is called misgendering, which is seems to be supported by emotions and logic insconstitancy. So pronouns would be based on gender, and are if they cause such a identity crisis. I can’t just leave things on being on their own. I often generally tend to try to dissect information, and understand it before I make a judgement.

(Explanation) For example when someone says that girls are weaker than boys, I'd first ask on terms of what, as I do understand that girls and boys have a very distinct body traits, as boys are much more muscular on average due to higher testosterone. However in terms of mental strength and other factors, it has more to do with environmental factors, such as culture, childhood, trauma, etc. As boys tend to be more mentally stronger because society is harsher on boys when raising them, however if you look at girls who were raised harshly, they tend to be on par. So it's not really about sex in that way. Then, after understanding what that person means, and applying my knowledge and contextual understanding, then I'd judge in terms of if that person's statement is valid.

________________________________________________

There has got to be no way you'll fuck this up.

i have looked that the questions. almost all of them seem difficult to answer. this is why i have so much trouble on sociotyping tests; because i do not understand what im being asked, and the relationship to real world context.

[Muira]

i have looked that the questions. almost all of them seem difficult to answer. this is why i have so much trouble on sociotyping tests; because i do not understand what im being asked, and the relationship to real world context.

That's because they are complex, please take your time, and remember to explain "why". Just take as much time as you need, I wouldn't even mind if you actually took 1-2 weeks.
I'll even guide you on the questions you have trouble on.

[anotherperson]

i finished the other questionnaire if you want to see it

[Muira]

i finished the other questionnaire if you want to see it

Sure!