The info for novices

[Sol]

This section is to help identify your Jung type.
For this can be used a data about your behavior: common and nonverbal. Usefulness of nonverbal behavior (by intuitive impressions and other) for Jung types identification was supported by an experiment.
For common behavior is useful to make some typing questionnaire (1) and to place it as a text.
For nonverbal behavior is useful to make a video with a tale about yourself, ~10 min, with good seen face, without glasses. Psychoactive substances, including medical, should not be used before. The language in the video should be English, but not obligate if exists a questionnaire in English.
All materials for type identification place in 1st message of your typing theme.

Also it's useful to try tests.

Don't tell opinions about own type and tests' results for some time. Let typing ones to think more independently, to reduce conformism effect.

As best approach to understand own type correctly is to understand it yourself. Though, opinions of other people can be useful in this too.
To suppose own type yourself you need to know typology theory. For this I recommend (among existing in English) to start with the books by Filatova "Understanding the People Around You" and Jung "Psychological types". The theory which deserves the most of trust is: 4 dichotomies, 4 Jung functions and their 8 variants (definitions by Jung and expanded Augustinavichiute's descriptions), which functions are strong/weak and valued/nonvalued, which functions are supplementing and opposing (intertype relations). I recommend to do not use other hypotheses about types as Reinin traits, other ideas by Augustinavichiute, by other authors. This restriction is especially important for beginners.
When you know the basics of the theory, you need to suppose Jung types of well-known "irl" people in your life in a number of >10. Especially, people who you've perceived and remembered as most personally pleasant and most annoying. To suppose types of people you may use: logical analysis of common behavior, intuitive impressions from nonverbal behavior (1, 2), tests (Gulenko's with 72 questions is not bad for this).
The task is to understand correctly own type and types of those people when is noticed that your and their behavior, your intertype impressions from those people fit good to the types theory (impressions from people of other sex is more meaningful). This may take monthes. Positive fiting to the theory of large and complexly linked data means high chance that your own type is correct. Also during this process you are geting practical understanding of typology theory and initial typing skills.
After positive checking of own type by described process and so having basis understanding in typology, you have the level to discuss the typology with other people.

Besides this forum, there exist other sites about Jung typology and paid practitioneers which may help you to understand own type.
The theory used today is partly doubtful or wrong, and existing methods are significantly speculative, so experienced typing one even with having good data may mistake in a type. The average typing accuracy of a test or a typer is probably 30-40%. When some type's trait is said by more number of typing ones - the higher is the chance that the trait is correct. During this is preferably that a typing one did not know beforehand external opinions about your type, to reduce the conformism.

[Sol]

Other variants to get the help in identifing Jung type (mainly paid ones, by alphabet):

Jack Oliver Aaron
Contact. Local account: @World Socionics.

Victor Gulenko
Contact. Local account: ?. Local comments theme.

Timur Protskiy
Contact.

Ibrahim Tencer
Contact. Local account: @Exodus.

Kendrick Uy
Contact.

P. S. Who wants to be added: name, link, etc. Offer a mod to input new info.

[Sol]

<reserved>