SEIs can be badass Jose Aldo being one. What are your thoughts about SEIs.
SEIs can be badass Jose Aldo being one. What are your thoughts about SEIs.
I've been teaching my son's SEI girlfriend how to debate. She loves it.
Their Fi comes off pretty neatly, they're one of the most "righteous people" you'll ever meet.
Very sincere, prone to small joking, and casual socializing.
They have this magnetic personality, almost coming off as Fi types
Everyone seems to like them because they simply know how to please.
And sometimes they act impulsively.
Their strength comes in time of threats, in which case they display a new caricature, and become brave. Never try to hurt them physically, because the babyssaurus becomes a king kong at the blink of an eye.
They can get especially aggressive if you imply some sort of mockery about them, even if not openly expressed.
By the way, not appreciating them is a sign of self devaluation, since you share half of the functions
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
Yes they can be aggressive..
they are amazing, and they are the type that most reminds me of my dual, SLE. They aren't necessarily the type I would choose second to be with after an SLE, but they are the type I would choose to date before an SLE. They are like a more tough IEI, but still nearly as romantic hearted as an IEI. I don't think IEI and SEI even make that good friends, they are too much like lovers. I look forward to any chance encounters with them. They are so intellectual, and they focus all their attention on you, their voices are like music and they are always excited about something around the corner. The 'push-pull' quality of the IEI-SEI look-a-like dynamic is one of the best feelings, for me. I read this description of 'push-pull' somewhere but don't know where.
Last edited by Bethanyclaire; 03-29-2023 at 03:39 PM. Reason: 4
Nah def not IEI hes completely present and in the moment there.I don't think I've ever seen an IEI become a top level mma fighter either.
Last edited by Amoeba; 03-29-2023 at 06:01 PM.
It's possibly when people by a training, initial predispositions (besides Jung type) then get achievements in regions of weak functions. For example, there are F types among technical region scientists of high degrees ("philosophy doctors"), with achievements. EIE in physics. I knew personally IEI with ph. doctor technical degree.
Among relatively good fighters N types may exist too. Conor McGregor mb ILI.
An example of IEI who was in field intelligence coy of sturm troops (airborne forces). Now he's a singer, while during obligate army service was there (not anyone can be taken and kept there, needs excellent physical form and stable psyche).
It's possible I think i've seen a few N types in MBTI Stephan Bonnar being one but that doesn't make it very likely at least at the highly competitive level. Connar Mcgregor is definitely not ILI lol, he's a obvious SLE. Khabib is an obvious LSI you can tell by the way they fight. Max Holloway is an SEE and Khamzat Chimaev is an SLE. UFC is full of SLE's and LSI's which makes sense because those type are most commonly found in the military.
There are actors with T and ILI types. A lot. While to play for sport does not need outstanding skills.
Alan Rickman (INTP), Brad Pitt (ISTP), Leonardo DiCaprio (ISTJ), Keanu Reeves (INTJ) - popular ones. Some roles are much with "poker face", but happens real acting when Brad Pitt got a prise for 12 Monkeys.
Weak regions need more efforts for same achievments. It's not critical obstacle. More time and sweat will lead to good result there.
I'd say even that for a human's emotional state is important to do something or even to choose occupations in weak regions to reduce Jung type accentuation. Additional efforts become the input to your own interests, at least to reduce neurotic symptoms a common part of which is reduced abbility to get the pleasure from the life as it is, from achieved results.
That Conor McGregor ILI boxer looks as rather satisfied by the life, for example. While Mike Tyson SLE, which mb better in boxing, has problems with emotions. The place to think.
It's MBTI followers approach was to say about stronger functions as "gifts". By Jung - it's an accentuation from the psyche view, but not a positive. Human's usefulness in defined by the sum of strong and weak functions, not by strong functions only. For any practical task all 4 functions are important equally, as for any function region exists the context of opposite function. Most possibly there is no use to have functions disbalance, while neurotisation problem exists. When Socionics says about duality types as attractive - sure they are, as show the hole inside human's Self. Those duals help to reduce it, besides to support in weaker sides.
https://youtube.com/shorts/MfGGy4AgZ2w?feature=share
Although I might entertain George St Pierre being IEI I'm conflicted between IEI and ESE though he's a total chameleon. Also this video is great advice for self defense he's definitely a professional at the highest level.
I think they are usually appreciated very much so, to me it's more the type of thing they are often very genuinely nice and compassionate and sadly that type of thing often doesn't get enough attention as being exploitative-ly fake kind (not really kind, more like I'll be ur master if u be the slave and not in a fun sex way etc.) or just being an asshole does. Some SEIs can be two-faced and manipulative though but that can be any ethical + people in general as well.
I think a lot of SEIs have control issues in that way, actually. It may be common with 1D Ne types in general, but they often seem to get freaked out by not having everything under their control, and they can try to control people too.
I took a couple classes in undergrad with wannabe teachers. A really high proportion of SEIs were among them. There are a lot of SEIs I've liked but these I did not. (I don't like teaching ed types as a rule.) The mindset was "this is the way things are. Everyone needs to follow the rules. I am the boss and everyone should obey me." I think this mindset is present in SEIs generally to some extent, more so in some and less in others but still a tendency with the type.
Last edited by FreelancePoliceman; 03-30-2023 at 05:21 AM.
One thing that is often overlooked about SEI's, is that they are usually very intelligent. My first romantic interest was SEI, and I could chat anything with her, that she would follow without problems, and grasp every nuance very quickly (and come up with reflections/solutions--this is something I like to do with my acquaintances, but to be honest, I haven't been able to do this with other people that I met after). As an example of this, I just read an analogy that Tallmo made to support the use of typology in relationships (he used mushrooms to make his point) and I am amazed how clever that was. Being LIE, I can run into trouble with them, but they can be cool from a distance.
Then, the angel asked her what her name was. She said: "I have none"
Jung's recapitulation of IP types says some important things about this matter.
Originally Posted by 10. Recapitulation of Introverted Irrational Types
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
not as hypocritical as IEEs
Bob Ross was cool. I like(d) him.
“Anything is possible. It is night on planet earth and I'm alive. And someday I'll be dead.
Someday I'll just be bones in a box, but right now, I'm not.
And anything is possible.”
There are Fe types and the Si types.
Si type, like my wife fits into the stereotypical comfort type, and her Fe is neutral reactive in helping people in an agony aunt passive role. '' Let me take your hand and hold it, and validate feelings, and i will give everything including the shirt off my back." It's a low key, low voice, let's not be unsettling tone.
Good at detail work and crafts things with the utmost care, very neat and organized.
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ___________________________
The Fe type, from what i've seen, corrals people into a flock and into the pen by following the standard rules in etiquette, with surface manners, and to do things by the book.
A little pushy and you would think pushy by being a thinker type in egocentric mode/terms, and together with the low ethic spectrum, but it is ethics as the drive, so sentiment driven.
Ever watch Little House on the Prairie? Mary Ingalls is the Fe type as a good characterization of it.
Black & white is a shallow divide ∕∕division is the color that multipliesx
Taking things at face value is good only for a spell⛧
Abstract builds a soul, a house can never become a home without it ♀
A little better makes better more>
♦♦
i feel like SEIs often dont appreciate themselves enough. they can seriously be the sweetest souls. their warmth and generosity to their friends, but also their disposition within themselves
and the meticulousness...nobody can show up a Si lead's attention to detail... love
I'm slow to type people but the couple of people I've typed as SEI have been some of the nicest people I've been around, very comfortable for me. Up for adventure but also happy to chill, curious, emotionally sensitive to those around them, tactfully opinionated, inclined to appreciate and create physical comforts, an aesthetic sense without being over-the-top (imo), clever and able to converse on a variety of topics without needing to live in the weeds, etc.
5/5 would recommend as a friend
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
I think everyone has a place where they feel powerful. Not sure if by "Not enough appreciation for SEIs" you mean here. It's kinda obvious that they won't be, just like these types: LSE, ESE, SLI