My contribution to this thread
IEE love SLI because of their introverted nature but may take them a while (after having dates as many Estj and ISTJ) in the course of their dating career to finally understand the connection they have with SLI in the meantime they maybe friends with them for a long time
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Not here to blow up anyones ego but I'm more comfortable being around EIIs generally than IEE and it makes me question if i'm an LSE. IEEs seem like they would cheat on you more easily and wouldn't value you as much as a person. It throws me off but I don't mind being proved otherwise.Originally Posted by Beautiful sky
You could be lse
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think you're not SLI. Maybe some intuitve type, but I haven't intertacted with you enough, just an impression
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
I don't think you're IEE more ILE to me
Trust me on this one, he's IEE. You notice that very easily after talking to him for more than a minute through the phone.
The reason I said I think you're not SLI is basically because your thought process seems foggy to me, which isn't supposed to happen among duals. Maybe you're my "activator" or "benefactor" or illusionary (even though I don't take ITR descriptions at face value)
But this is not a "type me thread", so I'll leave it to that
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
No offence but it sounds like weak evidence though. The only other type I get is ILI on tests. I've Taken the Gulenko test and got SLI https://socioniks.net/en/test/. The socionics extended test also gives me SLI - te https://www.sociotype.com/tests/. If you have any other objective measures by which you can type me let me know. But I'm not going to accept some random on a forum say "Oh you're not SLI" without any other evidence or a suggestion on what other type they think I am.
Really ILI was the type that came to my mind after I started talking to you.
I have a lot of experience with sensors, and I just feel this lacking of sensing in your communication.
I don't have strong evidences though and I don't want to battle type you
But you seem very abstract compared to the SLI I've known
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote