@Sol
Skip to 7:00 and watch from there
https://youtu.be/jVLlnBtd6rg
Examples of EII
@Sol
Skip to 7:00 and watch from there
https://youtu.be/jVLlnBtd6rg
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She is an Extravert and she displays a lot of Fe. Here she is with her husband who is the introvert of the couple. He might well have an SLI TIM (or a rational sensory introvert ). He doesn't emote a lot i.e. he is not emotionally demonstrative like she is and in fact she encourage him to be more emotionally expressive like when she wants him to verbalize his love for her etc... I think He was at the origin of the minimalist lifestyle her channel is all about, she was the one that had the tendency to accumulate objects which again points to an expansive attitude and extraversion. At around 9:55 they talk about their problem of communication which is an interesting moment in the video. I don't except a lot of facial expressions from an EII, their emotions seldom show up on the surface. In fact her husband's lack of emotional display is closer to that of an EII.
here is another one
Last edited by godslave; 02-22-2023 at 05:38 AM.
I always think Rowling is EII, or she’s IEI? I think her book has a very strong Si-Ne slice of life style. Hogwarts is a fucking dangerous school with all the traps that could easily kill off unlucky students, but all of it’s dangerous get treated in a Ne silliness way more than being taken seriously.
Its funny that she always supports the SJW but by only disagrees with them in one point, she became their worst enemy.
https://linktr.ee/tehhnicus
Jesus is King stops black magic and closes portals
self diagnosed ASD, ADHD, schizotypal/affective
Your face makes your brain and sociotype – how muscle use shapes personality
I want to care
if I was better I’d help you
if I was better you’d be better
Human Design 2/4 projector life path 1
Noshes INFJOriginally Posted by godslave
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Rowling - INFP
Sigrid - INFP
there are commands to play since a time
youtube.com/watch?v=jVLlnBtd6rg#t=7m0s
her type is extraverted
Mb cause there is no justice or truth to say nonsence and a lie about what human's sex is.
Sex is an abbility to born children - genes, organs. Not just "I'm unicorn" declared opinion and changes in the look.
man and woman - are sexes, primarily. not what someone cosplays and cripples own bodies, clothes, etc. to get more of suface similarity with other sex.
What happens - is a try to destroy normal humanity. Including by removing sexes and natural way of birth people - possibly for all or a majority on some territories. There is no "social justice" in a lie and making other harm to normal people, to pushing them by violence and madness a harm they do not want for themselves and for the world.
Capitalism is satanistic dictatorship where a minority has real power and does not care about interests of a majority and mb even mad to hate the life itself. Now this minority pushes sexual madness to suppress the majority and deals with them alike with mindless animals. And this even works.
What says Rowling in the situation is what the most people think or would decide after minimum thinking. She protects interests of normal people by not supporting harmful lie what some crazy minority wishes to spread.
They're so earnest.
ἀταραξία
No she’s INFJ
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I like the way you argued lol. But since it’s your type you probably know better
What do you think about the husband type?
It’s easy she’s imparting values in a non forceful way
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
7:00 starting there she sets the morals for proper maintenance of relationships
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I’m interested in the husband type more. He look Fi value at least but I can’t decide what’s what
Still no idea. Maybe SLI or just a more introvert EII (compare to the wife)
You should ask her in the comments in one of the videos she’s great at responding.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh he’s SLI for sure
Activity relationship
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
They both teach the same thing which is to connect us to things that are more important so by theory both are not INFJ
Even Susan cain who said the same things as this woman. By your theory any and all emotions are prohibited to INFJ just to Fe
https://youtu.be/MdxCiFk-37c
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
And she and Susan Cain look almost exactly alike here
https://youtube.com/shorts/KGSH9qT4S_Q?feature=share
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Still in doubt that Rowling may not be EII but IEI. In her videos she is less expressive, but whenever she did it somehow feel more Fe-like than Fi excited.
Something about her screams ILI to me
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I did think about that. But her novel world logic and economic system is just straight up stupid. ILI writing novel probably focus on background logic and lore even more than the story itself, like I think George Matin could be ILI, the GoT series highly focus on drama between people like hatred and friendship and power struggle, doesn’t heavy focus on any higher thing to connect to.
She says she’s not a big cryer here and has only cried what once or twice. Umm I don’t think that’s INFJ I can say for certain INFJ in their 40s/50s cry way more than twice
https://youtu.be/BLV68BPT8Io
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Here she seems very ILE; however her imagination still points to Ni
https://youtu.be/Mg3oCq_E8Os
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 02-23-2023 at 03:28 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
HP from first page to last page is about the main character internal feeling towards everything around him. 4D Fi I must say. And Dumbledore seem to be a wise Beta NF.
To be honest I have not read it. I Will thought
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Taeko from Only Yesterday.
Dr. Kenzo Tenma from Monster.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yes, a good example of EII! I believe so, anyway. I’ve seen some IEIs like that too. Sometimes I have a hard time differentiating between IEIs and EIIs but I believe EIIs tend to be more steadfast about their values. They also seem to express themselves a little more clearly, like her.
I think some Socionics tests type me as EII because of my high Fi, but I believe that’s more demonstrative Fi. I don’t think a true EII would type as highly in Fe and Si as I do, nor as low in Te as me.
I’m not sure why I let myself be convinced by others that I’m anything but ISFP lol.
Yes the Fe does come through for you as well which is more understanding other in the moment rather than referring back to your relationships and personal experiences through your relationship and of course you do shed emotions in the moment
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I believe I also try to focus on my Fi a bit more than the typical SEI, so as to maintain my relationships. It’s something I’ve always admired in EIIs and ESIs and I strive to be like more. And since my Fi is good, I want to believe I can learn to value my Fi more!
https://youtu.be/dxw2NdY5PSc
Her intonation in her voice and sudden tone changes in statements are very much like my own here
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
A zen to life and katie marie - IEI
This person is an EII
https://youtu.be/kyumjVWFfVE
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
NO
Did you even bother watching the video and listening to her speak
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That Rosen guy is IRI he’s shedding a lot of emotions on camera by “I’m excited or I’m super exited
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
https://linktr.ee/tehhnicus
Jesus is King stops black magic and closes portals
self diagnosed ASD, ADHD, schizotypal/affective
Your face makes your brain and sociotype – how muscle use shapes personality
I want to care
if I was better I’d help you
if I was better you’d be better
Human Design 2/4 projector life path 1
Sweet Anita - Fe
She looks INFJ to me
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
she's Fe, too annoying
probably IEI, SEI
LSI imo
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
