Originally Posted by
Metaphor
I have no intention to argue but then you asked the others, including me, to know what they think about it. Therefore, I gave you yet another critic, which was the one that you have yet responded for no viable reason. Thus, I would suggest you to read Deleuze (in fact, I haven't read Deridda or Foucault), especially about Capitalism and Schizophrenia then think it by yourself, not using these baseless theories as the fundamental understanding for applying Socionics as it is. If you don't accept the criticism constructively, embrace your own shortcoming. It is important to be more open-minded and refrain from criticizing others based on their flaws of their own character as a person, because it is important for one to not be humiliated by the reasoning based on rationality, thus not being offended by such kind of critic that is hardly harmful to damage someone's mentality. Also, to address your own opinion about DCNH correlations, it's the fact that there is something not necessarily accurate about its application, not to mention that around 80-90% of DCNH Socion descriptions aren't inaccurate as it only adds temperaments and boosted functions instead of those trying to describe the quality of each subtype and the way it behaves and I know what I'm talking about on this one. In fact, Beta quadra is considered to be the most common by around 40-45% according to the statistics of world population I have received from G's students. Hence then, it means that there is something wrong about Model G, including that theory about temperament correlates to DCNH. Therefore, by using your logic that a type behaves like a certain temperament, doesn't that mean they are type of temperament, then? Or else, if someone is clearly an IP temperament but then is typed according to Model G as an EIE-H, for instance, doesn't that mean such person isn't an EIE and therefore mistyped, then? Think about it. I never took your post as an attack - discussion is needed to reach the most accurate interpretation.