"
At the same time, you're also very good at Ti - you appreciate coherent arguments and you're able to quickly point out inconsistencies or flaws in logic, but you don't use it yourself to form positive narratives or reach to new conclusions, you mainly use it in a negative, argumentative way, or in other words, in a clear and precise but in the end, in a demonstrative manner to support your Te upper in the stack and explain to yourself and others why are you discarding or dismissing ideas or informations you perceive as not relevant. And it all boils down to this: If it's not useful to you for a particular purpose, it's not relevant.
"
I've never in my life seen anyone analysis me so correctly. Differentiating between my Ti and Te use was one of the most difficult. And I have been having thoughts recently that all my life revolves around Te. You speak a clear and understandable language and I am reading something intelligent for once.
I read chapter 10, a bit rushed, it has been ages since I've read verbose stuff like that on psychology, I couldn't process all of it deeply. Just a gut feeling that this is relatable. But at the same time I am not sure if I am being biased, I only know my own mind and not that of others so I have no point of reference to know whether this is normal or not, I am worrying about whether I am falling for something akin to the barnum effect. I can say with certainty that I do relate to the ''underdeveloped" extraverted sensing part a lot. That part didn't use many fancy words.
Another thing that makes me doubt, is that my friend is INTJ (MBTI). He speaks a lot in metaphors. I don't tend to do that as much. So it makes me think I may not be a dominant Ni person if that makes sense. However, I do think 100% in images. Even when I am verbally thinking, it is usually people talking or a chatting screen like this. I rarely think only with sound or with sound included, in fact, imagining sound is pretty much non-existent in my brain except for when I am thinking while whispering. Someone pointed out that Ni people think a lot in images with that part I can 100% relate, fantasy, imagination and visual thinking is pretty much the core of my brain.
I also read a bit about ILI on this website. The Ni is part is very relatable and the Si part was so relatable that I started laughing out loud. It was spot on sentence for sentence. I think if I read most of these I can analyse myself what type I am, but would take a bit too much time.
"An ILI's sense of self doubt may lead to such assumptions as the presence of a brain tumor as the result of a mere headache. In contrast to Si types, ILIs are significantly less adept at making active adjustments to their lifestyle to correct these minor ailments."