>50% can mistake in own types. In types of other people - the similar.Originally Posted by lavos
So can be or not to be.
If for @Elmira is important that for other people was more clear what type she has, then may make a typing theme with 10 min video (free tale about herself, good seen face, without glasses).
I'd watched with an interest.
Regarding Gamma selftypings, that percentage is more like 90%(in this forum-- dunno how it is the russian community, whether this a global phenomenon)
Then, the angel asked her what her name was. She said: "I have none"
She’s ESI
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
How do you know. She hasn't provided any evidence besides these apparent comparisons, and the other thread where she criticized each of the types. Neither prove she is ESI.
Then, the angel asked her what her name was. She said: "I have none"
Just read what she writes about herself
Not what you think an ESI should be
She is ESI
And she doesn’t have to prove anything to you
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She doesn't have to, but I won't believe she is unless she does. If she doesn't care, I don't either, so, so be it.
Then, the angel asked her what her name was. She said: "I have none"
You can believe whatever you want and that’s not the point of this thread so if you don’t believe her ignore her instead of trashing her thread. Obviously she took great care in this write up
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Will do. Just wanted to cast some doubt on her self-typing.
Note to everyone: mistrust anybody who shows up with a gamma self-typing ! (Including me)
No gamma should self-type, I do due to some defiant streak I have, but if you are a gamma, you shouldn't !
Then, the angel asked her what her name was. She said: "I have none"
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
