Originally Posted by
Clarke
So actually, I once had a romantic relationship with someone who I think was a LII. I'd have to read more about the LII description to make sure, but he seemed like a NT type, and I think he seemed to value Fe and maybe even Si. Our relationship had the following characteristics:
-It was explosive and full of debate. The main source of debate was that he believed in a democratic Utopia with no money. I thought that a Utopia like that would be impossible.
-We had similarities. He and I both thought that working at a job was boring, and wished we didn't have to do it.
-We had differences. He left school because he hated doing math, thinking it was useless in principle. I stayed in school because I knew and/or was told that it was important for my future. I didn't understand his rationale for leaving school.
-We put different value in health. I used to go to bed at a pretty decent time. However, he believed that staying up late, despite having school the next morning, was completely okay and that I should tough it out. I ended up following his rationale.
-He had a greater pool of knowledge than me, which made him seem fairly intelligent to me. I think that I usually absorbed the facts that he said.
During or after our relationship, I started to take on his characteristics and his debate style. I've wondered for a while whether that was a possible sign of a look-a-like relationship, but that wouldn't explain why I seemed to have the decisive dichotomy. So far, the best explanation for that has been that I've been a decisive type that has taken on aspects of other types (such as SLI potentially Aristocratic characteristics), rather than a type that has taken on decisive characteristics.
My viewpoint that a democratic Utopia with no money was impossible was probably taken at least partially from my upbringing (at least one potentially Delta parent), but the fact that I was defending it might still mean that I was somehow intellectually distrusting or obstinate. I'm not sure if I'm understanding the dichotomies right.
I'd guess that the LII's element was fire.