Years of Jung studies and still I have too weak methods/definitions to categorize what intuition does.
I mean, I can understand on a more superficial level what it does and how to spot it in others very well, but if I have to think what I value most, I just don't know.
It's like I lack the comprehension of these concepts if they aren't related to others or between others. I need to analyze others to see these concepts and then it will be super easy to categorize.
If I try asking myself what it is for me, I just come to the conclusion that maybe Ni is more archetypical in the way it seeks connections between things, and the importance is on the matrix of the process, while Ne valuers give more importance to the products of connections, not the matrix. So, maybe I value Ni more, because I spend my life trying to categorize abstract connections I perceive between both people and things, and I reach conclusions that try to "close" things in a way I will know how to act if same things happens again.
Or, I can rely on the fact my Ne lead friends tell me I'm too sure to know how things will go in the future, not giving a chance to possibilities that I sense will go nowhere.
But... that sound incomplete, and I may be wrong.
Anyway, here some question:
- how to differentiate Ne and Ni in a way I can have zero doubts about it if I have to not rely in analyzing others?
- What about Ti and Ni?
Does Ni perceives connections between things while Ti categorizes these informations?
How to understand if I value more Ti than Ni and vice versa? (Higher dimensionality for Ti respect to Ni, for exemple)
- Being intuitive detatches you from the real world, but at what extent?
Now a strange question:
- How can I understand in a deeper way if intuition is connected to something not directly lived? like for exemple dreams, books and other medias?
If a person concentrate on the sensations he felt and images he saw during his dreams, it is more a sensing or intuitive thing?