I've recently taken part in Gulenko's 2-part Socionics Diagnostics session. I've included both of the videos below. His assistant said that he will be getting back to me on Monday, but I'm curious if anyone has any guesses about my type before then.
I've recently taken part in Gulenko's 2-part Socionics Diagnostics session. I've included both of the videos below. His assistant said that he will be getting back to me on Monday, but I'm curious if anyone has any guesses about my type before then.
Last edited by hellohellohello; 07-18-2022 at 12:29 AM.
I guess ILI-Te or LIE-Ni
Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!
-Raskolnikov
Idk who typed you EII, I can take a few guesses who but I'm not going to drop any names, because I think that typing is full of crap. Anyways, I think G is looking for dynamic vs static, contact vs distance, and how stable your nervous system is. Hope you enjoy the process and result in any case
Socionics is a dangerous thing for a woman like me to have, but I have it.
Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 07-12-2022 at 07:40 AM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I highly doubt the friend I was mentioning is my supervisor. We've been MUCH too close, almost since we met back 14-15 years ago, at times almost to the point of inseparability.
The things you mention are some of the reasons why I've never been able to figure out my type, as I think there are a lot of contradictions.
- I don't get stuck on people's problems. I enjoy helping people with their own problems versus focusing on myself. I don't think that's an R thing, in fact, despite my temperament, I think it's an E thing, maybe just a general Extroverted thing.
- I hardly ever get anxiety, as I know 99% of the time what is coming and I take that time to best prepare for those events. I've never been considered as "short-sighted".
For reference, I've self-typed as either IEI/EIE, and sometimes ILI. I've never truly thought I was Gamma though. If I am then I am not a stereotypical Gamma. In fact, my two closest friends (one of which being who I talked about) are more than likely SLE and LSI, and they've always pestered me about not acting logically or having very little connection to reality.
I think I can easily put up a front, and that's what confuses others AND me about my typing.
No problem. Just remembered she typed one close friend as EII so I thought it was you.
For Gulenko, looking at the left is indicative of irrationality, to the right of rationality, upwards extraversion and downwards introversion. Although I have to say your general nonverbal gives the impression of a rational type.
I kind of beg to differ on first because relations are relations.
Number 2. I get it but it is very far from the devil may care attitude which comes with 4D Ne (the absence of anxiety because I'll figure out how to run the business even if half of my body is chopped off).
But we will see alternative would be rational Te type.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
On the video there you look as low emotional. Much of the time you avoid to look to camera and so nonverbal is harder be seen, hence to understand the type. Mostly you associated with beta T.
If you took psycheactive substance before making that video, then that could influence on nonverbal expression. A quantity of people on psychology forums use meds, drugs, overuse ethanol.
Among F I'd suspect EIE. IEI seems as too doubtful by nonverbal.
Your recent behavior on the forum reminded F. But there you may play or be under a substance.
In this theme your talking is closer to J.
If you'll want opinions about your type and will place a video, - this should be in clean mind state (min 24h).
Already proven IEI time and time again by Jung's writings, Ausra's writings, etc.
Not a Rational type. Watching my videos back, it's easy to see Irrational and Intuition is leading as any sort of Ethics doesn't present itself readily.
I could also prove this by transferring my consciousness to you as I tend to only react via impressions and not out of necessity (Irrational > Rational) but as we know we don't have the technology for that... yet
You would also need to make a case for:
1) Ne Demonstrative
2) Si Vulnerable
Neither of which are present. If you're picking up on any sort of Ti it's because it's Mobilizing and therefore more present than it would be if it were my Suggestive.
I haven't heard from anyone (besides Gulenko, and he doesn't even make a case for it) that they see Se. If they do it's because they're seeing Ti and pairing that with Se because Ne is not present (Ignoring).
Even getting to know me IRL, IEI would be extremely apparent.
Looking away from the camera - Introversion > Extraversion. Can't be shyness as if I was shy I wouldn't have made the video in the first place, or be willing to make another one.
LIE Te
https://linktr.ee/tehhnicus
Jesus is King stops black magic and closes portals
self diagnosed ASD, ADHD, schizotypal/affective
Your face makes your brain and sociotype – how muscle use shapes personality
I want to care
if I was better I’d help you
if I was better you’d be better
Human Design 2/4 projector life path 1
Watched the first video
IEI
Do you mean jack from WSS?
Last edited by Still Alive; 07-08-2022 at 08:10 AM.
IR may help to understand own type. Much of IR influence goes from intuitive impressions from nonverbal behavior as facial mimics.
EIE: 1 , 2
LSI: 1 , 2
SLE: 1 , 2
IEI: 1 , 2
Better IR are more comfortable. More differing by functional strenght types are more intriguing. To evaluate is important generalized image of people of same type, - this reduced nontypes factors.
There is a hypothesis based on Jung ideas and some observations that people with some of disorders (homosexualism, narcissism) may have differing perception of IR (more contradicting). In other cases IR should manifest as expected by theory, even from videos - if you'll tune on personality of those people. Problems may stay with nontypes influences and wrongly supposed types of examples (I try to reduce such chances, but they happen).
It's better evaluate IR effects during irl informal communicating.
If have >10 of good irl known people who have behavior and IR effects with some of your types as fiting good to theory - it's good basis to trust that type as yours. As it's low possibly to get such situation accidentally. Types of people you may guess logically, by tests, intuitivelly from nonverbal. It's how I checked own type. Jung's book and Filatova's in English - is good theory to start this checking.
You posted much of texts. So you seem interested and wish to understand. You mainly need _practice_ which will allow you to notice about what you read, - basic theory. If you'll do positively the described checking of own type - then you'll get minimum level of Socionics. At now you more play by theory, which is badly described and partly wrong. You should trust to theory basics only, - Jung's definitions (dichotomies), IR basics, partly interpretations of e/i sides of functions.
Mb this will help.
The popular guy drops his typing then everyone follows like little ducks. Not that I have anything against that typing but holy fuck people have too few own ideas.
My guess is you're a logical type, focus on matters related to socio Logics and perceivable lack of proficiency in the ethics realm, Gulenko might type you LSI or ILI, although he can still surprise you with an extraverted typing due to your eye movements (when remembering or coming up with something you look upwards, if your video is not "reversed" it usually goes to upper right corner, which Gulenko tends to interpret as an EJ thing).
If he types you as ethical, it will probably be 4D-Fi.
Last edited by RBRS; 07-08-2022 at 12:23 PM.
Let me be the first to say that my typing methods are "Ready Fire Aim", and my initial guesses often turn out to be wrong.
For example, I think that these are bricks, but they might turn out to be IEIs. https://imgur.com/a/Wbp5Ms5
Only time will tell.
Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.
I will admit, though, that I like to see other viewpoints expressed.
I never really realized before I encountered Socionics how certain I can appear to be about some subjects. I think this is a feature of LIEs which is built for convincing investors that some crazy scheme is going to make them rich.
But in truth, no matter how certain I might appear, I always have some doubts about my conclusions. This is why, I think, I need the often doubting ESIs around to fact-check me.
u are selectively ignoring information
what about when ive said a typing first then a popular guy has the same idea
this guy's body language is LIE. i know a LIE, the way he talks and flicks his eyelids, it sounds stupid in words or maybe im just strugglign too much to explain what im observing
its clear the resemblance, LIE - Te bottom right.
im saying Te bc his eyes seem more active, but im not sure about it.
https://linktr.ee/tehhnicus
Jesus is King stops black magic and closes portals
self diagnosed ASD, ADHD, schizotypal/affective
Your face makes your brain and sociotype – how muscle use shapes personality
I want to care
if I was better I’d help you
if I was better you’d be better
Human Design 2/4 projector life path 1
>What about when I said a typing and a popular guy said the same afterwards?
Where's the connection here? Two separate cases
>Sounds stupid
It effectively sounds dumb but don't worry, I've seen cheaper typings, and this one can in fact ring true. The VI correlation is correct.
Watched your whole videos, analyzed non-verbal cues, and applied the semantics method alongside temperament installation, and I have the absolute, definitive response; You're an IENSTFjp, one of the rarest personality types.
Ohhh this is exciting! like a game or something
ok…first impressions…sorry, but your shirt instantly thinking Ni/Se here
and then I thought mayyybeee LSI, but something about it made me pause. Didn’t seem quite right.
so then I started thinking gamma, and ILI.
And this was 45 seconds in lol …
so now I wait to see how I did
Last edited by Aster; 07-08-2022 at 01:23 PM.
I don't know what your type is, OP, but I am curious what G will say.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Also, I tend to notice Adam going in the direction of others typings, and I hadn't thought about it going the other way around (though I guess these things can go both ways). But I don't want to make this thread about Adam, it isn't particularly helpful.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
@OP I watched your videos and guessed ILI-Te
Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!
-Raskolnikov
Imo, I think it’s more true that people are more likely to follow the first typings made in a thread and isn’t exactly just dependent on the person, although it can influence (like past typings made, general social opinion…etc.)
I want to know what you guys are smoking?
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
perhaps ILI