There are graphic and accurate film depictions of how "third-trimester" abortions work. Tell me that's not murder.
Try to formulate a truly coherent argument as to how second-trimester abortions aren't distinctions without differences.
Maybe you could make an effective argument in the first-trimester where at the very beginning it really does look like a mere "clump of cells" as many have argued.
The problem then becomes the exact moment you'd say the "mere clump of cells" becomes a true and viable "human".
I handily avoid this problem by asserting the embryo is a viable human the instant it is fertilized. Trust me I've got a metric fuckton of "intermediate states" I can imagine and they're all BS in the ultimate and final analysis.
This is likely the result of a tension between
![Extroverted Logic](images/smilies/Te.gif)
and
![Introverted Logic](images/smilies/Ti.gif)
The applied vs. the theoretical (and likely why Alphas as a whole will eternally war against Gammas).
For me, it comes down to yet another distinction without an observable and objective difference.
![Extroverted Logic](images/smilies/Te.gif)
results mattering over
![Introverted Logic](images/smilies/Ti.gif)
theoreticals.
Fuck the latter. What matters is the former. Results in objective reality over all else.
![Extroverted Ethics](images/smilies/Fe.gif)
and
![Introverted Sensing](images/smilies/Si.gif)
considerations can collectively get fucked.