@
Subteigh
Unlike with your "Mini Me" who got Christmass spanking for more primitive trolling than you do on the site, as a gift.
You've mentioned vaccines and autism as impossibly to be matched.
It's journalistic research based on open and modern scientific biology data. There is about covid and _used vaccines_ "against it" to have factors which predispose and hence should arise the quantity of dementia brain disorders, symptoms and mb the process as of Alzheimer, Parkinson, Creutzfeldt-Jacob diseases (on preborn and earlier age states dopamine related breaches mb may arise autism variants too). Other potentially arised disorders relate to oncology and vessels, heart. Also, covid series infections have traits of being made artificially, and most possibly spreaded intentionally.
(
What in essence is virus SARS-CoV-2? (part 2) by Olga Nikolayeva, "Sut vrevemi", N565, 2023-12-24 (in Russian language) [Чем на самом деле является вирус SARS-CoV-2?, Ольга Николаева, "Суть времени", N565, 2023-12-24])
Some of used data:
1 ,
2 ,
3 ,
4 (preview),
5
About esoterics.
The main there is the abbility to influence on the reality and to deal with it in practically useful way with the accent on human's imagination. The principle of the intention and of the assurance/believing.
The same as you move by your body only by your _intention_ to do an action, without a knowledge and detailed conscious control about your biology (what muslces, neurons, cells should to do) - the same you may use your mind abbilities based on a similar intention. The same as people had no knowledge in the past about details and limits of how a body works, the same people do not know all in now about what their mind may to do, its limits and what are all traits of the world with which they interact.
So it's practically possibly that you may do supposed as impossibly by common peoples knowledge and common peoples abbilities/skills. Just by your mind imagination, intention, assurance and regular training to achieve something.
Examples of what I saw on facts myself can be related to telepathy between people. You imagine and something happens outside of accidental chance, where it's not obligate to concentrate the imagination by ritual-alike activity, but can be enough as just to wish much to direct your unconscious processes to start the work for it - what is perceived as an intention.
By the seen influence on other human's mood, actions and interactions as meeting accidentally (multiple cases, several for moods and linked actions). It does not seem be limited by close distance. And mb other dimentions, as a time, for some influences. It did not needed to see a human, he knew or could to suppose what to happen. It's correct experimental data, goten not a single time. Which was goten by an activity accented on imagination (wishes, intention, assurance) method. Similarly as you are moving by your hands. And I can't be unique with this experience.
Telepathy is a part of what now is thought and practiced as esoterics, on "science level" related same as random delusional mess people may produce. Mistakes and lack of skills with usage of this are possibly as with anything else, and a fail of an exprimental try does not proof it as non-existent. When I made my experiments with nonverbal typing method to say it as useful approach was possibly only with 2nd of them (when average match has arised to ~20%), after I've modified the initial conditions to oblige people to use more of nonverbal data (2 clips minimum for a typed human).
I suspect there were sucessful telapathy experiements and mb for other "esoterical" methods. About which no one may care, the same as no one cared about women who died after a birth because of infections goten from medics. Even when there was known enough - "scientists" opposed against the evident. Same as I notice there is no wide acceptance about experimental proof for nonverbal data and intuitive-nonverbal method as useful for identification of Jung types. Even doubtful on sites where people got this info and the theme of which supposes N imagination as one of important data. The majority (>90%) of Jung typology users heard nothing about this and may never hear. Telepathy is far more unusual to be accepted as existing, are or not proofs about this.