Member Questionnaire Manatroid92

[Manatroid92]

Now that you mention it, I can LSI H(Fi,Ni) for you. For LII H(Fi,Si). LxI-H and xEI-N can explain the shadow of others.

There are not so many LII examples except old politicians and dead/ancient people so I don't know the difference much.

However, I also read both descriptions and I can say LxI's Si seemed similar to me on the book.

If we disregard, creative, polr, the biggest difference was Fi-, Fi+. It was phrased in a way that LII dont, cant socialize people much if they don't know the person and if the topic is not an interest to them, while LSI can socialize people if they want to.

Besides that about their N vs S, it is written that LII can separate primary from secondary. When you read this, it may seem like something you can do. But do you actually do this when you are working or do you think you can do all of it without separation?

Yeah, Normalising subtype was my assumption in the event that I actually was an IEI.
I do know that I find socialising difficult with newer people. I’m not suspicious of them per se, and in fact I have a generally positive view on people in general. I think it generally depends on the disposition/mood of the person in question: if they act like they’re happy to see me despite me being a stranger, I’ll be perplexed but more open to talking. But I pretty much never do small talk, generally even with coworkers unless we share an interest (one coworker plays Total War games, for example, and since that’s relatively close to my keener interests, I can talk pretty easily with him on the topic).

I’ve noticed the “separate primary from secondary” trait is mentioned very often across LII articles through Socionics at large, and I have a vague idea of what it means, but I don’t actually know if I’m confusing it with something else.
When I’m trying to make a point to someone, I avoid belabouring on the details too much if I think they’re not important to the point I’m trying to make. And I don’t really mean that in a cherry-picking way, like their inconvenient to me, it’s just that I find it kind of stifling to go through the details unless the person in question needs me to, or if I think that they haven’t understood me. Essentially, the ‘point’ is where I’m trying to get to, and the details are kind of in the way *until* they become important to the conversation. There are other times, though, where I *will* just miss the details altogether, in which case…uh, oops.
That being said, it really sounds like I just described the Result part of the Result-Process dichotomy, so let me know if I’m off-track or not.

[myresearch]

That being said, it really sounds like I just described the Result part of the Result-Process dichotomy, so let me know if I’m off-track or not.

It is result Ti, IEE is result type but IEE cannot make such a separation.