Member Questionnaire Manatroid92

[Manatroid92]

Okay, so heavily reconsidering my typing again after some time to be EII-Ne.
I'd previously sat on LII and ILE for a couple months, but have recently been in a whirlpool of doubt and bouncing between other types too, namely LSI, SEI, ILI and IEI (yes, the whole gamut of Quadras).

Maaaaybe, IEI as a distant possibility, but I don't think my Ti is so bad as to be PoLR-level of incompetence (though that's something that requires real-life communication with people, I assume).

Apart from some other things, a thread that made me reconsider my typing is this one. https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ose-of-Ti-role


As before, any reliable advice is welcome.

[myresearch]

Okay, so heavily reconsidering my typing again after some time to be EII-Ne.

I don't know why you think you are Fi ego, I see that people start to get type X type as a first or second post and then everybody starts to type that person that way and hence person naturally start to think like that as well, I think we all fall into this trend when typing ourselves and others.

But I am sure that you are not Fi ego based on your video.

I'd previously sat on LII and ILE for a couple months, but have recently been in a whirlpool of doubt and bouncing between other types too, namely LSI, SEI, ILI and IEI (yes, the whole gamut of Quadras).

I think you are LII>ILE based on sources on VI and your formation of speech. They fit to Ti a lot especially. However, I haven't met any alpha NT and I haven't met anyone similar to you. Hence I cannot be certain and your other considerations seem possible.

Maaaaybe, IEI as a distant possibility, but I don't think my Ti is so bad as to be PoLR-level of incompetence (though that's something that requires real-life communication with people, I assume).

Apart from some other things, a thread that made me reconsider my typing is this one. https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ose-of-Ti-role


As before, any reliable advice is welcome.

I don't know what made you reconsider it, but Ti egos can make moral judgement and their moral judgement is generally based on reason instead of a disgust that occurs without them knowing why.

[Metamorph]

I don't know why you think you are Fi ego, I see that people start to get type X type as a first or second post and then everybody starts to type that person that way and hence person naturally start to think like that as well, I think we all fall into this trend when typing ourselves and others.

But I am sure that you are not Fi ego based on your video.




I think you are LII>ILE based on sources on VI and your formation of speech. They fit to Ti a lot especially. However, I haven't met any alpha NT and I haven't met anyone similar to you. Hence I cannot be certain and your other considerations seem possible.





I don't know what made you reconsider it, but Ti egos can make moral judgement and their moral judgement is generally based on reason instead of a disgust that occurs without them knowing why.

Isn't Baruch Spinoza EII though?

[myresearch]

Isn't Baruch Spinoza EII though?

I dont know and the answer of that question wouldnt change anything I wrote.

[Metaphor]

Isn't Baruch Spinoza EII though?

No, LII.

[Metamorph]

No, LII.

That's not much of an argument, but to be fair, I didn't give much of an argument, either. I'm just not inclined to believe things solely because most people say them.

[Metaphor]

That's not much of an argument, but to be fair, I didn't give much of an argument, either. I'm just not inclined to believe things solely because most people say them.

I could argue if I wanted to, but I suppose this isn't the correct thread to do so.

[Metamorph]

I could argue if I wanted to, but I suppose this isn't the correct thread to do so.

Subteigh thinks many of the famous philosophers are EII, but then, he doesn't use anything resembling any form of socionics. He uses the Big Five model, which socionics stands in direct opposition to due to socionics using a cybernetic model (this is why I title myself "Cybernetic organism" now. We're all cybernetic organisms if socionics is true, no robot parts required.)